6
Classical1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think most people on here have truly good intentions. Most people here are highly intelligent, and if ever there was a concentration of people who actually literally think for themselves, it’s here. This is the antithesis of a hive mind.

That’s why I love this forum. In a world polluted by BS, this is a stronghold of hope for me.

2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

What the fuck is this shit my god. Horrible. If this is not true, whoever came up with these ideas is sick.

10
Classical1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thank you for this detailed explanation. I’m just starting to find my feet here. Waking up is startling but I’m settling into it gradually.

2
Classical1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Over target fellas.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

But it smells nice!

3
Classical1 3 points ago +4 / -1

NO evspra explicitly said NO BANS for discussion. You need to go re-read those posts.

3
Classical1 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should watch their response now to all this. Serious doubts have been raised yet all they do to counter is ban. That’s very damning.

Btw the scripture thing also stuck with me and I’m very wary of coincidences. So... hm.

1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Critical thinking FTW.

Screw confirmation bias.

We aren’t addicts on hopium.

Confidence unshaken.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

by Evspra
2
Classical1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone said it’s BS also, like a cheap knockoff or something >_<

Good luck wading through 500+ comments over 3 different posts haha.

by Evspra
6
Classical1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know. It started to smell fishy from there.

So now let’s wait and watch their reaction now that their prime audience has figured them out...

by Evspra
12
Classical1 12 points ago +12 / -0

Over target.

3
Classical1 3 points ago +4 / -1

That correlation is a logical fallacy.

by Evspra
0
Classical1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah I was reading 4101 earlier.

Discernment...

by Evspra
0
Classical1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well... I’m fairly satisfied at the conclusion of this rollercoaster today haha. I’ll move on from George unless something unexpected comes up. Ah well...

by Evspra
5
Classical1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ain’t that the truth.

by Evspra
10
Classical1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Their last few posts had a kind of saccharin quality to them that just went a bit too far for me. This new revelation feels correct. Information war guys, battle on.

by Evspra
9
Classical1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wow I stepped away for a few hours... lmao. Sheesh that escalated quickly.

by Evspra
0
Classical1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wouldn’t that be “a backchannel”?

by Evspra
1
Classical1 1 point ago +1 / -0

But George News existed since the 90s?

by Evspra
4
Classical1 4 points ago +5 / -1

I am of this opinion currently.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›