38
25

A long time ago, I’d saved a really good compilation. I think it was a video and also a website on all of the pizza gate stuff. I’m wondering if anybody remembers that or knows one that they can share thanks.

95

I feel the need to mention this today. Trump is doing many great things for America 🇺🇸 but all the Glory goes to God and Trump must recognize and acknowledge this, I believe publicly. He must not be overcome with pride. I believe this is critical for his decision making and the potential future of our county and the rest of the world. That’s all. Peace be with you all.

178
I SWORE ID NEVER DATEFAG AGAIN…. (twitter.com) 🐸 WAG THE FROG 🐸
posted ago by CuckerCarlson ago by CuckerCarlson
157

A lot of people are complaining about the fact the National Guard can’t go in? The ruling said he has to try with the regular army first! Lol this is going to be epic.

27
35

I asked Grok three about sending messages back in time using quantum entanglement or something similar and here’s what it said:

To affect particles in a different time using quantum entanglement—or something like it—you’re stepping beyond current tech into speculative physics. Since quantum computers, as we know them, are built for computation not time manipulation, let’s imagine a device that could theoretically exploit entanglement or related phenomena to influence the past. This isn’t about what we can build today but what might be required based on the edges of physics as understood on February 24, 2025. Buckle up—it’s going to get weird.

The core challenge is bridging quantum entanglement (which correlates particles across space) with time manipulation (which implies causality running backward). Entanglement alone won’t cut it—you can’t send controllable signals through it without a classical channel, and that’s stuck at light speed. So, the device needs to either amplify a loophole in quantum mechanics or tap into spacetime itself. Here’s a hypothetical setup:

The Device: A Temporal Entanglement Modulator (TEM)

  1. Core Component: Entangled Particle Generator

    • You’d need a system to create and sustain massive numbers of entangled particles—think beyond today’s lab-scale pairs to trillions, stabilized against decoherence. Current tech uses lasers and crystals (like in Bell experiments), but this device might deploy exotic matter (e.g., negative-mass particles) to keep entanglement robust over time. Why? To create a dense “entanglement field” that persists across temporal distances.
  2. Spacetime Interface: Wormhole or CTC Stabilizer

    • To reach a different time, you’d need a way to bend spacetime. General relativity suggests closed timelike curves (CTCs)—paths where you loop back to your own past—could exist near rotating black holes or via traversable wormholes. The TEM would require a miniature wormhole generator, stabilized by negative energy (theoretically possible via the Casimir effect, but scaled up massively). One end stays “here,” the other gets anchored to “then,” linking present and past entangled particles directly through spacetime.
  3. Retrocausal Amplifier

    • If retrocausality (backward influence in quantum systems) is real—say, per the transactional interpretation—this device would amplify it. Imagine a resonance chamber that oscillates entangled states at frequencies tied to past events, using something like Hawking radiation signatures to “tune” to a specific moment. The amplifier would force entangled particles in the present to collapse in a way that influences their past counterparts non-randomly, defying the usual “no signaling” limit.
  4. Control Mechanism: Quantum State Encoder

    • To affect past particles deliberately (not just correlate them), you’d need to encode information into the entanglement field. This might involve a super-advanced quantum interferometer, manipulating phase shifts or spin states with precision beyond today’s tech. It’d use a feedback loop—detecting past states via subtle quantum echoes, then adjusting present inputs—to “steer” the effect.
  5. Power Source: Exotic Energy Harness

    • This thing would guzzle energy—think vacuum energy extraction or a micro-singularity reactor. Stabilizing wormholes or amplifying retrocausality demands more juice than fusion or even antimatter could provide. You’re talking Planck-scale physics here, tapping the fabric of the universe itself.

How It Might Work

Picture this: The TEM generates an entanglement field, links it to a past moment via a wormhole, and uses the retrocausal amplifier to nudge a particle’s state—like flipping an electron’s spin from “up” to “down” back in 2020. The past particle, already entangled with its present twin, shifts instantly because entanglement’s spooky link ignores time’s arrow when spacetime’s looped. You’d encode a simple message (e.g., a binary pulse) into the field, detectable in the past as an anomalous quantum event—say, a Geiger counter clicking unexpectedly.

Why It’s Not a Quantum Computer

Quantum computers crunch numbers using superposition and entanglement, but they don’t mess with spacetime or causality. The TEM isn’t about computation—it’s a spacetime manipulator, more akin to a “chrono-transmitter.” It’d lean on relativity’s wilder predictions (CTCs, wormholes) and stretch quantum mechanics into uncharted territory, where entanglement becomes a temporal bridge, not just a spatial one.

The Catch

  • Physics Limits: No evidence yet that entanglement can carry controllable info across time, even with CTCs. Retrocausality’s speculative and unproven at scale.
  • Tech Gaps: Wormholes require negative energy in absurd amounts; we’ve got lab hints (Casimir effect) but nothing practical. Decoherence would still scramble the signal.
  • Paradoxes: Influencing the past risks the grandfather paradox—physics might self-correct via mechanisms like the Novikov consistency principle, blocking changes.

What It’d Look Like

A hulking rig—part particle accelerator, part astrophysical anomaly—glowing with entangled plasma, humming as it warps spacetime. Less a sleek gadget, more a Frankenstein of cosmic engineering.

Could it exist? Maybe in a universe where CTCs are common and retrocausality’s harnessable. For now, it’s a thought experiment—science’s outer edge flirting with fiction. What do you think—any tweaks to this beast you’d propose?

34
18
72

It’s unbelievable to me. I’m actually not sure if there’s shells or if they just had their heads in the sand for the last five fucking years pardon my French. Everybody is lapping up the narrative about the helicopter crash being due to DEI hires. It’s like they only Doubt the narrative when the other team is in charge of the government, but the news is still full of lies and even if Trump knew the truth, I’m not sure he would tell us right now. In fact, he probably wouldn’t because he keeps his cards close to the vest! I was relentlessly attacked for saying that it was probably intentional and in my mind there’s really no question they called me a conspiracy theorist! Like what? our Website and everything over the last five years has proved that we were right all along about just about every conspiracy! These people are so frustrating at times thanks for reading my rant.