Workplaces may be freaking out due to the House Bill changes that will increase the penalty for noncompliance. The House Bill modifies 29 CFR USC 666 to increase penalties for noncompliance to 700k (discussed on many other threads here). Here is my question. Can a company comply with 29 USC 654 and avoid fines from 29 USC 666 while also meeting all other 29 CFR and 29 USC requirements?
For example, does the material on the swabs in test kits have a SDS to ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1200? Does the vaccine need to comply with this standard, so should they be providing an SDS for that too once there is a workplace requirement? I mean, the informed consent requirement should be enough but that isn't in the scope of OSHA.
Further, the CDC recently changed the definition of vaccine. Now it is simply something that provokes an immune response. if a person is involved in a clinical trial for Ivermectin prophylaxis such as activ-6, are they already protected? Does that or some other example meet the new definition?
I'm not an expert and am just throwing this out there for people more familiar with these requirements.
Those who have played Grand Theft Auto know that when you're driving a certain car in the game, that type of car spawns more often in traffic. This is so the developers can save on memory, but it's also a real phenomenon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
Question - let's say some important news was coming out of a certain region or group. Would sharing music with references help indirectly raise awareness of the important news? Would people notice the name in the news more if if they had 'Standing on a corner in Winslow' running through their head?
I honestly have no clue, it was just a dumb idea. Smarter people should be able to explain why this isn't a thing.
