Hi, I have ordered some dry special cat food ahead but really hard to know how much to get so I am wondering about other solutions people are finding for feeding the pets if the shipping issues continue?
One example here:
Can anyone clarify: Multiple studies and professionals as well as the man in the above link are warning that the vax itself leads to more damage than the illness itself does.
So is this an ongoing issue indefinitely after some one has been vaxed or is there a window? I had heard that the worst danger is to be in close proximity to a newly vaxed person for about two weeks after the vax, and that second dose is more dangerous than the first.
and are the recommendations similar to "social distancing" of 6 feet appropriate when there is concern about a vaxed person being a super spreader?
So for all of us that have been "protected" by others who want to keep their distance for fear of spreading the illness, and they got vaxed...will now find themselves in a similar situation when the UNvaxed say they don't want to risk being near the vaxed?
I don't believe in "fear based" choices, but it would appear that this concern is fact based.
I want to see a few more things about all of this situation addressed:
- the inappropriate, unethical and illegal behaviors of the prosecution
- the source(s) of the drone footage and how they came to be **where **they were when they were
- who sent Kyle away from the group he was with and why, especially when the one who had combat experience said something about suspecting that Kyle could be considered an easy target.
Additions: 4. The media coverage brainwashing people. #4.A - discuss the results of the trial with family and friends to out the radicals 3. addition: were they black hats?
Perhaps you have more to add to this list.
Where does responsibility fall to follow up on this? I may also check with the Rekeita Law Offices who were doing a livestream during the trial and deliberations.
https://rumble.com/vnmmjr-emergency-broadcast-with-guest-dr-ardis.htmlenter text
This interview is about 50 minutes long, very timely with many many details on the issues with hospital protocols for "treating" covid, plus recovery directives as well. He is encouraging people to keep this information on hand and use it to confront medical personnel who try to push dangerous meds on people.
He has been on many news sites with this information.
Explains MAJOR danger of remdesever... 30% of those given this drug have been demonstrated to go into major organ failures, per at least 2 studies.
He notes that most of the world follows America's lead in medical recommendations/procedures, thus he hopes to get this information into as many people's hands as possible.
He also provides links to obtain the document that confirms that Ivermectin was approved for use..July, 2021...
nih.govtable2e.characteristicsofantiviralgentsapprovedorunderevaluationfor covid19treatment
as well as the document that also promotes the remdesevere and that physicians are being offered funds to choose that drug, a 20% bonus payout over the $2,400 they are giving to use this treatment. This is on the Medicare data base....CMS....
He gave places to obtain ivermectin and other supplements, sometimes in bulk.
Be ready to take notes!
I have learned a few things here: One may only have a mild to moderate case of "covid" and still eventually develop what is called "Long Haul" covid.
Frontline Doctors are continuing to refine a treatment protocol here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-recover-protocol/
Just asking...how are these antibody checks valid?
Is anyone else hearing the same question repeatedly or is it just here?
...and that you chose to disregard standard medical practice and knowledge in favor of political rhetoric, please explain how I am to now trust you again for my medical care needs?
So thankful for all of those medical professionals who did NOT lose their heads and continued to practice medicine and treat their patients!
Any help with dates and specific links to what seem like primary issues over 2020 would be much appreciated. I regret that I didn't keep a running timeline all last year, but just some bookmarked and downloaded articles! I just kept thinking surely someone will come to their senses pretty soon...NOT.
Thank you for any specifics you can add!
** 2020 Time line for Exposure of Covid 19 “Errors”**
October 2019 Event 201 Global Pandemic planning (including Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: major goal of population reduction.)
Spring, 2020 Group of Chinese scientists stated clearly on record that the covid virus likely came from Wuhan Lab.
February 19, 2020 Lancet Journal article signed by 27 scientists saying it WAS NOT from a lab. By Peter Daszek LATER RETRACTED Date:______________
______WHO admits the pandemic model was wrong, grossly overestimating percentage of deaths.
______ Man who developed PCR test goes on public record that it was NOT intended to be used for diagnosis.....and in ______ 2021, added the issue of changing the cycles that affects results
______US National Library of Medicine/National Institute of Health admits forecast model for Covid19 was wrong. August 25, 2020 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/
_____CDC admits numbers of deaths are not what was anticipated.
_____anything by Dr. Peter McCullough in 2020 or early 2021 that dealt with his awareness that many medical professionals were inexplicably not following normal protocol for pandemic: skipping steps 2 and 3 which involve treatment, before going to 4/vaccine.
Spring, 2020 Dr. Zev Zelenko made first videos about his protocol derived from study of how other physicians worldwide were successfully treating. HCQ, zinc, Zithromax…now over 1000 patients treated…
May 15, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXNJxOFS0lU UPDATED: April 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKQvDTf1RJ0
NOTE: All those who promoted use of HCQ were severely censored, admittedly. FB says 17,000 such entries were deleted, for example.
May 2021 FOIA release succeeded in obtaining 3,000 of Fauci’s emails, which confirm his foreknowledge of the origins of covid 19, his previous support of HCQ as an answer for any coronavirus issue, his awareness that masks do not protect people, etc.
Just thinking about questions of Biden's status/use of meds....and I remembered this issue coming up several years ago, suggesting that there are indeed other people/members of Congress who may be dealing with Alzheimer's.
I see now that there was a little "walking back" addendum to the original article, but the suggestion of concerns remains. I can't help but wonder again which members this might be.
I am just trying to imagine the implications of this, and if constituents have a right to know if their representatives are suffering from mentally debilitating illnesses. I am not sure if this subject would be covered under federal or state guidelines.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/11/16458142/congress-alzheimers-pharmacist
I don't know how to re post this, but trying to just copy it from 8 days ago. It seems like a month at least!
It was under this heading: Believing Q while being an evangelical Christian – Part 3: The Q story and Biblical Parallels by greeneggsnham Flowerpotz 3 points 8 days ago +3 / -0 Another possible parallel:
How about 1 Kings for a parallel that seems pretty relevant to me:
An aged King David didn't take action to anoint Solomon as the next King as promised. Another son, Adonijah, took it upon himself to gather people, like Joab the leader of the army, and Abiathar, the priest, who were NOT loyal to King David, invited a lot of people and hosted his own anointing, or inauguration, as we'd call it.
Prophet, Nathan and wife, Bathsheba brought it to David's attention. He then made arrangements for Solomon to be anointed king immediately, with all the appropriate officials loyal to his reign, and large and noisy celebration with the people.
(So it went all the way to and through a "fake" anointing/inauguration before action was taken.)
When news of the anointing of Solomon was broadcast far and wide, those with Adonijah panicked and scattered. Adonijah went to the Temple and tried holding on to the horns of the altar which was a place of asylum.
Solomon had him removed from there, brought before himself, the new king, and made him to yield and pledge allegiance to Solomon. He was then sent to his home, which seems like a "house arrest" to me. He was told he wouldn't be bothered any further if he proved himself worthy.
David counseled Solomon to pay attention to those who had not been loyal and to essentially remove them, which eventually led to dealing with Joab. Joab also ran to the altar and held on to the horns, but it did not save him. He was not one who apparently had a genuine faith, so was just "going through the motions."
I thought, if this current situation goes all the way to and through an inauguration of one who did NOT lawfully win this election, it will be a very difficult thing to see, to say the least.
BUT, if it is "Biblical" perhaps this is a head's up and maybe even an encouraging word.
No one can fool God. May His will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
