Intro
There was a post made to the board today that garnered the attention of a few mods and which was subsequently removed for posting a dodgy sauce with dodgy assertions. (Thank you mods).
Someone suggested I check it out, so I did. After a glance at the article itself, whose headlines plus first few lines stunk to high heaven (sensationalism, over-the-top claims, appeal to known biases, favorite villain, etc), I went into dig mode and applied an approach that I have found to be very useful for digging up potentially bad or evil sources.
I present that approach here (Three Steps) for pedes to consider, as a case study into 'busting' potential disinfo or clickbait operations or operatives. I invite pedes to draw their own conclusions from the data (even though I also post my own).
Note 1: As the narrative war steps up, the best, first defense is developing our discernment skills and investigatory practices.
Note 2: The following is a cursory (meaning not thorough or detailed) study using a few easy-at-hand resources.
Subject: Article: https://slaynews.com/news/wef-pushes-ban-home-grown-food-fight-climate-change/
Step One
search for same text from other publications > attempt to find original source or verify that the article / text is original here. (tool: search engine, i.e. google, etc)
Method: take a section of the text, sentence, etc, and search in search engine
=
Almost identical text found published on "News Addicts" (N/A)
https://newsaddicts.com/wef-warns-home-grown-food-causes-climate-change-demands-ban/
Slay date: March 1, 2024 vs. N/A date: February 3, 2024
After finding other earlier source (and no other), run a comparison between them.
Step Two
verify or investigate authors > check avatars, names, etc. (Tools: search engine, pic recognition, google, tineye, etc)
=
Two-1: check profile
Slay author : Frank Bergman
https://slaynews.com/author/frank-bergman/
Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.
NOTE: blurb, no concrete or verifiable details
Two-2: check identity avatar
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8cba3174a095e11a787c2b1268dc9916?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Frank Bergman" with any journalist connection.... "writer" "slay" "author"
COMPARE
Two-1:
N/A author : Hunter Fielding
https://newsaddicts.com/author/hunterfielding/
NOTE: no blurb, zero information
Two-2:
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0285a67d14cc3301b877cc335719bc1?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Hunter Fielding" with any journalist connection, including "writer" "news addicts" "author"
DATA
*Both identities use https://gravatar.com/ for their avatar.
*Neither avatar appears anywhere else on the web (tools: lens.google.com/, tineye.com)
*Bergman has a very generic "blurb" for his profile in addition to stories he 'authored', no concrete information or data provided. In other words, he is anonymous. Fielding has no blurb at all for his profile, only stories he 'authored'. aka anonymous.
Step Three
Investigate publishing bodies, to see how transparent or otherwise they are, attention to verifiable information or data
Slay News
https://who.is/whois/slaynews.com
Registered 2021-10-30
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, admin : Great Britain, East Sussex.
Name Servers based in the UK : livedns.co.uk
Address on website: 63 Us Hwy #21 Jonesville, North Carolina(NC), 28642
Note: From memory, I have seen this address and location before, including street view, in digging into TPV, NewsPunch etc.
COMPARE
News Addicts
https://who.is/whois/newsaddicts.com
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, Admin : Great Britain, East Sussex
Address on Website: P.O. Box 20989 West Palm Beach Florida 33416
Tel: 561-686-1165
SEARCH Address:
belongs to Newsmax (Google)
https://www.newsmax.com/contact/
Newsmax Tel: 561-686-1165
Questions
Who uses anonymous avatars and profiles with zero concrete information or verifiable sources, but presents themselves as "journalists" writing articles on publications presenting themselves as legitimate sources of news?
Who copies texts from other 'authors' but presents it as their own, with little or zero modification, etc?
What publications paint themselves as "pro-american, patriotic, American values," describe themselves as "the world’s leading independent media source for political news junkies" (N/A) and "one of the nation’s fastest-growing alternative media companies" (Slay News), and are "designed for patriots" (N/A) and "promises to always prioritize its most valuable asset – our readers"?
Sauce:
https://slaynews.com/about-us/
https://newsaddicts.com/about-news-addicts/
What publications would provide a fake or false address and contact information in the US, while being based overseas (i.e. UK)?
Is there a pattern or are there patterns of activity/behavior similar or identical between these two 'sauces'? (hint: yes. Same avatar source, same IP provider, same or similar text, etc)
Also: we are anonymous here, but we do not present ourselves as anything other than anonymous. Who is anonymous but at the same time presents themselves as not anonymous? Why would they do that?
Wrap Up
Often, the first place to start myth-busting disinfo or clickbait operations is to check their details, looking for hints of legitimacy or otherwise. Aka the Sauce Check.
Often, even a cursory check can turn up red flags that make it easy to bring the information being published into doubt. Remember, the BEST disinfo always combines X amount (larger amount, normally) of truth with Y amount of disinfo.
Disinfo is most effectively delivered by wrapping it up in a bundle of seemingly legitimate information, in order to disguise the disinfo.
In addition, information that is presented while appealing to people's emotional biases (aka "We're patriots!) often seeks to circumvent otherwise critical thinking. Thus, a Content Analysis is also a very good option as a starting point.
For me, I think the data, re: these two publications, is pretty damning, to start with. So who do you think they are, and what do you think their motive is? To spread the truth? Or to do something else?
Think about it.
Comments
In the above, I have gone to looking at SAUCE as a first step, based on the red flags the headline and text raised for me straight up. However, another equally valid avenue of approach is to examine the text itself, and compare with other articles on the website. What style do they use? What subject matter do they target? What text format (i.e. themes, sequence, arguments, references) do they use? How robust is the content (sauces, reasoning, style, information)?
The problem here is that content alone can be a tricky beast. If the purpose of the publication is EITHER to grift and exploit truth seekers OR to inject disinfo into the truth sphere using undiscerning truth seekers as their conduits, then the information is going to be presented in a way that primarily plays to the target audience's (aka YOUR and MY) biases and emotions.
Also, disinfo or clickbait is best delivered in a package of apparent legitimacy, so spotting the red flags can be tricky. The Sauce Check approach above can be used to get leverage on the content, so that one approaches the text content in a far more skeptical way.
Together, however, whether Sauce Check >> Content Analysis, or Content Analysis >> Source Check, the two of these together deliver a powerful basis on which to regard the publication and content as either Friendly to Truth or Hostile to Truth.
Content Analysis Bonus:
Note that in the article(s) looked at here, the pattern is VERY similar to the NewsPunch format:
Sensationalist Over-the-top Headline plus 2-3+ sentences with bold but sourceless assertions about <despised group/individual> plus copy/paste or presentation of actual legitimate information
Make of that what you will.
Addendum: I checked out the SLAY address and it is the same address used at
https://demo.hashthemes.com/viral-mag/news/
Which is only a "demo", leading to the possibility that the operators were preparing it as a possible deployment or as a practice run for other operations.
I'm pretty sure I found that when investigating the (bogus, imo) Son of WEF co-founder Pascal Najadi narrative that came out last month.
The Viral Mag thing follows the pattern of Newspunch and also CNBCUS, also huffmag.com, which present themselves (originally) as a legit general news or interest website, before then being used for disinfo deployments.
https://huffmag.com/category/opinion/
Najadi himself linked to this fake dodgy website (CNBCUSA.com (now defunct)) on Truth Social as evidence that his assertions are true and that its going worldwide!!!, which at a minimum calls in to question his capacity for discernment, and more broadly calls into doubt his legitimacy. Look at all the dodgy places his article was posted (aka select a segment of the text and run a search on google or other search engine).
Disclaimer: I use google for such searches because they have the largest or one of the largest catchment ranges. I'm not looking for suppressed or censored sources, but purely for web presence, etc.
Hat tip to Charles Dickens for "A Tale of Two Cities" https://www.gutenberg.org/files/98/98-h/98-h.htm
Harris, on X:
Today in Munich, following the news that Aleksey Navalny has died in Russia, I expressed my deep sorrow and outrage to his wife, Yulia. My prayers are with her and his entire family.
https://twitter.com/VP/status/1758614844540887274
Sure. Sure. Only hours after the news that Navalny died (in prison, where he was no threat to Putin. He was in prison for sedition, not for "opposing Putin", as the Globalist propaganda machine wants to spin it), here is wife is already all dolled up and doing an interview with Kamala Harris.
Show do you spell "SET UP"?
Let's look at the trasnparent timeline:
Tucker, who clearly is NOT under DS control, announces an interview with Putin.
Tucker tapes interview, allowing Putin to talk at length, smashing the propaganda picture of Putin as Lunatic madman determined to rule the world.
DS panics, creates the Russian Nukes From Space narrative. It falls flat, so quickly...
Navalny, someone who has been found to be colluding (or potentially colluding) with M6 intel agents to overthrow Putin, conveniently "dies' in jail.
When do the Navalny didn't kill himself memes begin? And where was Hillary when this went down?
Orange man bad. Russian man badder.
Starting point: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fani+willis
I really don't do this very often. I mean, for a long time now, I've generally avoided the MSM, in its various forms.
It started back in 2016-2017, after I learned of the existence of "alt-media", after finding out that the corporate and state run media are basically corrupt as buggery. I stopped listening to public radio, and I weaned myself off of television. The more I learned, the more that listening to all the drivel and garbage became unbearable.
Once Q popped up, my engagement with the media sphere became primarily focused on digging, exploring, and interacting with anons, while combing through some MSM to dig and corroborate, and explore the drops. I would visit MSM essentially to dig on stuff, so my ... 'consumption'... of news media was directed and focused, unlike in the past, where I simply listened or watched and didn't think too much.
In this period, for a while, I engaged with sources that I thought were more .... or rather less ... corrupt. Like Fox news after DJT was elected. And by Fox news, I mean selected shows, Like Jesse Watters, or Hannity (yes, because Trump would use Hannity to get stuff out there, etc), etc.
But in the wake of the Stollen Election, with the massive exposure of the UTTER corruptibility of the whole of the media complex, I tuned it all out. Fox was exposed as Faux, and a lot of the others too.
Perhaps I tuned out more than I should have. I mean, it's important to know what narratives the propaganda machine is spinning, and know how they spread their propaganda. But honestly, for the most part, I just could not stomach it. Aside from the incidental digging.
But years have flowed under the bridge, and it seems that time has served me well.
I Dared, And I Emerged Unscathed
Out of a (morbid?) sense of curiosity, I've spent a few hours just combing through the Fani Willis testimony and even listening to some of the idiotic commentary from one or two mainstream US news services, and I didn't throw up once!
While I thought to myself Gee, these people are such clowns, I did not feel the sense of revulsion I used to. I mean, take this for example. Dan Abrams Live
I mean, Geraldo Rivera? And some obviously Marxist, Clintonite former federal prosecutor Shan Wu? Not once did I feel the need to stick my fingers down my throat to elicit a retch.
I watch the whole clip. I even found it entertaining, although I watched in what felt like different time zone, detached, at slow motion. Like Neo looking at the Matrix and seeing it for real.
I like to think that this is because I have become completely immune to their rubbish. Not only do I not believe them; I mean, I haven't believed them for years. But now when I look at the content, the broadcasting and the print, I don't see anything .... real enough to affect me. Have I finally stepped fully and completely beyond their reach?
Their ability to even stir a response, trigger or aggravate me seems to have disappeared. And that, I would say, is real immunity. If you listen, and it makes you mad, outraged, hot and bothered, they are still affecting you in some manner. (And let's face it, the DS propaganda machines also work to trigger us negatively if and when it serves their agenda.)
Immunity Means Their Ability to Even Agitate You is Gone
But when you get to the place where you can tune in to the propaganda complex, and observe, listen and watch, and they still they have zero ability to deceive you, move you or agitate you, or in any way interfere in your functioning, you capacity to analyse, to observation, or to raise even a negative emotion, I think that's when you are probably fully immune.
Either way, I feel like seeds planted almost 8 years ago are truly coming to maturity. And to think, I have Fani to thank for all this.
But on another note, oh, Fani. My oh my. You're in some deep shit now! But take comfort. You'll always have Belize.....
As an experienced professional interpreter and translator, I'd like to remind pedes that any simultaneous interpreting is going to omit at least 30%+ content and meaning from the interaction.
This is an unavoidable result of the interpreter having to both listen and speak at the same time, and to operate in real time at the same speed of the person who is speaking. Interpreting from one language to another is a highly complex activity requiring massive amounts of mental energy, and it is simply impossible for an interpreter to effectively both listen and speak at the same rate that the original speaker is thinking and talking.
Moreover, when an interpreter does not have native-level fluency in the target language, also, a variety of nuances can be lost.
Listening to the interpreter ("interpreting" = audio or spoken translation, "translation" = translation of a text), it is clear when certain nuances were omitted, and sometimes not well expressed in English.
For example, at one point, the interpreter for Putin says "That's a subtle question". It seems clear from context that what he means here is "that's a crafty question" "that's a clever/sneaky question", edgy. That is, a question designed to prod, trick, maneuver or even manipulate the respondent, even though the emphasis isn't that strong.
Edit: Another example is when Putin appears to be speaking in the first person, obviously conveying what 'Ukraine' is saying, but the interpreter says "we, you" etc, and that can be a bit confusing at times. Is he saying "We, the Russians", or is he saying "We, the Ukrainians", or "We, the Germans", etc?
Recommended: to really understand and grasp the content of Putin's replies, seek out a translation into English of a transcript of his answers.
(What I mean is, at some point, someone - probably an official Russian agency - will publish a transcript of Putin's actual words. Hopefully, someone or some party will then undertake a professional translation of that transcript. Such a translation will show much more clearly what Putin was actually saying.)
When a transcript is created, all the words spoken are recorded and then a translator can spend much more time and effort refining the translation and conveying the nuances, subtle meanings, and exact expressions in the target language - in this case, English.
Simultaneous interpreting delivers only a very broad foundation for interaction and dialog, but necessarily omits a lot of the meaning. The core elements are there, but many of the nuances get lost.
Addendum: Here is a transcript of the interview, but NOTE, this is a transcript of Tucker and the Interpreter, and technically, these are not Putin's own words.
Sadly, many outside the interpreting profession have little awareness of the natural and necessary limitations of simultaneous interpreting, and tend to deal with an interpreter's words as if they are the original speakers own words. They are not. So it is critical to allow for at least a 20%+ margin of error.
Democracy 'in the balance' as El Salvador's Bukele wipes floor with opposition
Threat? What Threat?
Apparently El Salvador's God affirming, Christ-loving President has just been re-elected in a landslide.
Reportedly: 85% of the vote, 58 of the 60 seats in the legislative assembly.
Looking at 'news' stories about this, I was struck by one particular headline: Democracy 'in the balance'
Don't you just immediately get the doom and horror vibe that the MSM propaganda machine continually flouts anytime someone not controlled by the Cabal establishment appears or emerges or wins some sort of victory? I did.
So I took a look. I think its instructive to review how the propaganda machine works, and what their strategies and methods are. So...
El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele has proclaimed his landslide reelection victory, attributed to a wildly popular crackdown on violent gangs, as an historic drubbing of the opposition in a democracy.
Observers and analysts now fear that democracy itself is at risk in El Salvador.
So, what are they saying here? Because the President (apparently more of a believer in God than a believer in religion, which is always a good sign) has been so successful, so popular and so highly appreciated by the people of the country, he's a risk to democracy.
By now we all know what they mean by "democracy". They mean:
Our controlled, manipulated 'democratic' system when we decide who does what, and you, the people, act like sheep and cattle under the illusion that you actually have a say
The 42-year-old leader, who has sarcastically embraced the monicker "dictator" which critics use to describe him, did not wait for official results to claim a sweeping electoral triumph just two hours after polls closed Sunday.
"According to our numbers we have won the presidential election with more than 85 percent of votes," Bukele said on X, adding that his party, Nuevas Ideas, had taken 58 seats in the 60-seat legislative assembly.
With such overwhelming numbers, Bukele "achieved an absolute concentration of power," said Tamara Taraciuk of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank's Rule of Law Program in Washington.
"Salvadoran democracy hangs in the balance," she told AFP.
AFP news. The nexus and mainstay of propaganda media in the current decade.
What's the bet that the "Inter-American Dialogue" is an infiltrated globalist machine?
Let see what their funding is (reportedly):
The Dialogue's funding comes from a diverse group of corporations, governments, foundations and multilateral organizations. In 2018, grants and contributions represented 35% of the Dialogue's revenue, government grants accounted for 26% and the corporate program provided an additional 15% of the think-tank's funding.
Major donors span the globe, from foundations in El Salvador, Ford Foundation, Henry Luce Foundation, Vidanta Foundation and the Van Leer Foundation. Several governments, such as Switzerland, South Korea, and the United States, provide funding through their foreign affairs ministries. Major private sector donors from around the world, including the BMW Corporation, Pearson, and Ladrillera Santafé financially support the Dialogue, as do many individual donors from the United States and Latin America. The Dialogue's mission is also supported by multilateral organizations that work in the region, like the CAF-Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Organization of American States.
Banks, corporations, 'governments'. No surprises there.
Commentary
In the past, the Cabal exploited the Cold War Beast, the USSR and its global Communization agenda, to facilitate and establish counter-movements leading to fascist dictators in the central and south Americas (as well as other parts of the world).
Hegelian dialectic: create opposing blocks, and exploit the dynamic between them to infiltrate and control.
So in those days, there was a natural concern about extreme 'right-wing' dictators. The poison of global communism was used by the Cabal and assorted evil humans to establish corrupt systems superficially pitted against the Marxist 'Left' but which were ultimately subservient to the same self-centered evil.
However, Global Communism ala the USSR died in 1991. Before it died, it's successor: the globalist commu-regime was fostered (from WW2 and earlier) centering on Europe, but infiltrating all of the West. Globalism is a form of fusion of the evil 'left' and the evil 'right' - Communistic, stakeholder fascism where corporations control governments and the people are controlled via a communistic social credit system.
Prior to the 2000s, the left vs right paradigm was dominated by evil. However, just like the thief on the right side of Jesus at the time of the cross, the "right' has historically been in a position to acknowledge God and be more receptive to God's influence.
Today, the dynamic has shifted. What we see today, what is being revealed, is the Satanic Left/Right - aka the Establishment, the Uniparty, the Globalists - vs God's Left/Right - aka the People and their chosen representatives.
Understanding Satanic Divide and Conquer
In the satanic Left/Right, the Hegelian dialectic method is used to control the people by presenting an image (a fake image) that Left and Right are working against each other and offering alternatives. In reality, in the Cabal system, the left and right are not alternatives. They serve the same masters. The very definition of controlled opposition.
In the Heavenly Left/Right, however, there is no Hegelian dialectic. There is unity, centering on a common purpose, one that recognizes and puts God (not religion) at the center and which acknowledges that living men and women are the true sovereigns under God, not government. Government stands in the Left, and serves the People who are the true Right.
What we see in Hungary, in El Salvador, and in the Mighty USA is the emergence of God-centered unified work, where power is restored to the People, and the people make the choices and THEIR chosen champions serve them, not rule over them.
In the current era, the Satanic globalist propaganda machine constantly seeks to exploit the ghosts of their evil past and project that on the present, case in point being Bekele in El Salavador.
If he hasn't been branded yet, he will be branded as a far-right extreme dictator. "Democracy lies in the balance". Horror! Fear! Danger Will Robinson!
But Bukele, like Argentina's Javier Milei, like Hungary's Viktor Orban, like America's Donald J. Trump, is not 'far right', or even 'right'. What he is, politically, is the true centrist. God is the creator, the people are the sovereigns under him, and government MUST serve the people.
This is being called "populist" because the People are finally rising up, awake and sick of the deceptive matrix, to choose the representatives who truly serve them. But what it really is, is true centrism. People and their servants unified in their correct positions.
It's not Left vs Right, It's the True Right working with the True Left
The true cooperative paradigm is where the People stand in their right position as owners, and their elected (Chosen) representatives stand in their correct position as servants, and Truth and Freedom are liberated. This is the original form of [right] + [left]. Just like mind and body, like husband and wife, like plus and minus. The two work together in pursuit of a common purpose, one in which God can and must be present.
The old paradigm of "left vs right' will pass further and further into oblivion. As the Great Awakening shows the real paradigm is Satanic lies versus God-centered truth. It's all about Angelic (Luciferian) control vs. Human freedom as sovereigns under God.
They are right to be scared. Because nothing can stop what is coming. And as the good book says, God Wins.
Q1822
They want you DIVIDED.
DIVIDED by RACE.
DIVIDED by RELIGION.
DIVIDED by CULTURE.
DIVIDED by CLASS.
DIVIDED by POLITICAL AFFILIATION.
DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
YOU, THE PEOPLE, HAVE THE POWER.
Q on Emotional Pushes
Q1988
See how FAKE NEWS works?
See how CLICKBAIT works?
See how EMOTIONAL PUSHES TO TARGETED READERS works?
Q
If you search the Q drops for the word "emotional' you will find several instances where Q elaborates on how emotional responses are used to manipulate people in a number of different ways.
This points to fact that it is important for truth warriors, anons, Q patriots and researchers, to a) be aware of how their own emotions may be being used or targeted and also b) to observe clearly when others are using emotional pushes to manipulate people and to critically evaluate the purpose and intention behind certain narratives.
Dom Lucre's Tunnel Investigation
Dom Lucre has built a big following on X (1 million followers) and has now dubbed himself "The breaker of narratives".
On January 31, he released a "Tunnel Investigation" short film (https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363).
🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Every year, over 1,000 children go missing in the State of New York, and many are never found. New York is ranked 5th in the nation in child abductions. The State also has one of the most extensive tunnel systems in the country, with almost 1,000 tunnels reaching across the entire state. Many are secret.
On January 8th, 2024, clashes broke out at the World Headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch Synagogue in Brooklyn New York- known as the “770”.
Footage leaking from the clash revealed that there were secret tunnels dug beneath the synagogue, and millions witnessed the extremely alarming images coming from the videos: a book covered in blood, a child’s highchair, and a soiled mattress.
With reports of widespread cases of child sex abuse occurring within the Chabad; theories began to spread about the true purpose of these tunnels.
Last week, in partnership with Truth Army Films, I went to New York to investigate not only the Chabad Tunnels, but also the underground network of tunnels that run underneath the entire state of New York.
Now, we are releasing our findings to the world.
Watch ‘The Tunnels’ FULL documentary HERE:
Time Stamps:
2:40 - The Unsealed Chabad Tunnel
5:19 - Symbolism in tipped off tunnel
12:53 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Enters The 770 Chabad Synagogue
6:17 - Child Sex Abuse Victim of The Chabad Synagogue
18:26 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Films Get Kicked out The 770 Chabad
22:19 - Dom Lucre speaks to the New York locals About Child Trafficking
26:42 - Final Tunnel/Closing
But in this film, there is a rather problematic section starting at 6:17.
https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363
Jordan Sather comments:
But for 6 minutes of this film, Dom Lucre "interviews" an Australian man named Manny Waks who gives testimony of child abuse he received when part of an ultra-orthodox synagogue.
Problem is - DOM LUCE DIDN'T INTERVIEW HIM.
Dom and his production team took Waks video and fabricated a set to make it look like Waks was talking to Dom. Manny Waks is disgusted how his testimony was used in this film. He had never heard of Dom Lucre before. How disgusting to make this man's vulnerable testimony and slap it into this shoddy production.
Dom has a history of stealing content and acting like it's his own.
This whole film appears to be a massive money and clickbait grift. Who cares about the truth when you want to be popular, right Dom Lucrative? Engagement is all that matters!
(https://t.me/jordansather/9898)
Waks himself responded to the Dom Lucre film this way:
A shoddy and outrageous piece of “journalism”…for the record, I’m completely distancing myself from Dom’s nonsense. I didn’t give him an interview and I’m appalled that he’s using this unrelated interview for his conspiracy theory.
https://twitter.com/mannywaks/status/1753114223159500813
As someone else tweeted:
@dom_lucre you got som'splainin' to do
@trutharmyfilms you said it was a real interview.... You want to explain yourself now?
Lessons and takeaways
We are living in the midst of a psy-war. In the psy-war, everything revolves around information - true information, fake information, distorted information, information used for purposes as varying as exploitation, manipulation, control and liberation.
One wonders why Lucre and his film team were so willing to insert a section of information that presents a very false impression. Notice how the time in the section is spent focusing on Lucre himself. Apart from creating the impression that he is interviewing Waks, it also makes Lucre himself a feature and aspect of the film.
Why? We expect this sort of behavior from MSM hacks like 60 minutes, but if Dom is truly about exposing truth, then why this?
It's hard to not wonder if Lucre is more interested in his own agenda than the actual truth agenda. He could have easily set the content up in a manner that does NOT create the illusion that he is interviewing the man. Why didn't he?
Perhaps because the interview content has nothing whatsoever to do with New York, or even the USA.
Again, Sather posts:
Manny Waks isn't even from New York, his testimony is related to events that happened in Melbourne, Australia.
How is it relevant to throw his video into this documentary about tunnels in New York?
Plus, nearly every large metropolis has tunnel systems underneath it. And the whole recent Chabad tunnel fiasco in New York didn't have child trafficking going on.
Human trafficking = necessary to expose, but not in shoddy, clickbait ways like this.
Dom is acting like he's doing so much to "expose human trafficking" - when in reality... he's not doing that much. Just fabricating empty conspiracies for popularity. Nasty grift from a lazy "reporter"
https://t.me/jordansather/9900
For me, this situation highlights what to me is an important realization:
The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down, as if there are only TWO monolithic factions vying for supremacy.
In addition to deep state / Cabal operations that are attempting to perpetuate and defend the Cabal control on the narratives, there are also myriad other actors whose agenda may neither be to support the DS or fight against them. Think opportunistic black marketeers who exploit the chaos and vulnerabilities generated by war.
Moreover, even among the exploiters, some of these will merely be self-interested opportunists, but others may also be Cabal disinfo operations disguised as self-interested grifters, etc. It's important to realize this and keep one's sense of skepticism alive.
Whether you conclude that Lucre is a grifting 'lazy reporter', or someone caught up in his own hype, or a truth warrior who screwed up here, the real point is to pay attention to who you listen to and ALWAYS apply your own critical thinking to the information that comes across your screen, and question your OWN conclusions.
Such a practice is key to the goals of the Q operation.
Q2816
The DECLASSIFICATION of all requested documents (+ more) will occur. This is not a game.
Do not let personal (emotional) desires ("do it now""now""what is taking so long""NOW!") take over.
Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied.
Game-Theory.
One of my favorite GAW frogs, u/winn, posted an article that has been published on cnbcusa.com
The headline touts Man of the Moment Pascal Najadi (GAW search https://greatawakening.win/search?params=pascal+najadi&community=GreatAwakening), even though the article only refers to him once or twice and links to the "viral video".
One smart frog pointed out that the website urls is different from CNBC (https://www.cnbc.com/) even though it uses the CNBC logo, and voiced his/her suspicion.
I was prompted to dig a little, and I'm posting the results here because I think this is a good opportunity for applying some of that anon analysis and critical research methods that Q has tried to train us in.
What a curious operation. Take a look at the live website: https://cnbcusa.com/
The stories are old, not very active. There are a few things to note:
1 Not very active, stories posted sporadically and with large time gaps (iow, not daily news or even weekly news, which indicates a VERY small number of 'journalists' active there
2 The "About us" blurb make grandiose claims that do not make sense
CNBC USA is the number one business and financial news network on the planet.
Our mission is to help the influential and aspirational to make astute decisions to get ahead.
CNBC International ensures no matter where you are you can keep up to date with the latest breaking business and financial news.
With international headquarters in London and Singapore, we provide you with the perfect 24-hour global business briefing. From the start of trading in Asia, through the Closing Bell on Wall Street, our fast-paced, hard-hitting business coverage makes CNBC essential viewing for any senior business leader.
But click on the "Business" tab, and this is what you get:
Article: Jan 18, 2024; Article Jan 15, 2024; Article: Apr 27, 2023; Article Dec 5, 2022, etc.
So, not exactly the "number one news network", not exactly a source where "you can keep up to date", unless you are a piece of granite with an existence of a few million years. "24-hour global business briefing"? I don't think so.
3 The "author" - David Stevens, has posted only 5 articles on cnbcusa, and he (?) uses a stock photo as his avatar pick
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/bearded-man-listening-music-through-earphones-2054809910
There DOEs appear to be an active Journalist "David Stevens" who also lists cnbc as one of his conduits, but the face does NOT match the cnbcusa David Stevens (obviously)
https://muckrack.com/david-stevens
https://www.housingwire.com/author/david-stevens-cmb/
4 None of the other stories on CNMCUSA or by the so-called cnbcusa David Stevens match or vibe with the current article on Pascal Najadi. They are all about other things, quite a varied theme base, and nothing that resembles the 'blockbuster' "Trump is Wartime President, WEF, Pandemic murders, etc" article.
Note: I did a deep dive dig on my favorite (well, despised) disinfo operation come clickbait site NewsPunch (aka YourNewsWire, ThePeople'sVoice) and found precursor publications on the url covering random, varied topics, like men's fashion, etc, for a few years, before it transformed and exploded out as "News No One Else is Brave Enough to Publish" in 2016.
For more on NewsPunch, see:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDKA0/newspunch--know-your-clickbait-a/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5lYrwWt/the-anons-discernment-prayer--pr/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPeWhp8I/know-your-clickbait-newspunch-cl/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5lYrwWt/the-anons-discernment-prayer--pr/
#Conclusions:
Add all these up and there are a few possible explanations.
Most likely are two:
One, this is a sleeper disinformation operation, that was established in sleeper mode, publishing reportedly legit articles on random topics, prepared to be activated at the right time to publish disinformation or "dirty news" designed to mislead and to poison the water hole in the awakening / truth sphere.
(By "dirty news", I am using the analogy of a 'dirty bomb', an explosive device that contains radioactive elements intended to poison the location and people where it is exploded, to describe the idea of news information that has some explosive power (i.e. truth) but which also contains misinformation and disinformation, the purpose of which is to disrupt the flow of actual fact-based truth and mislead those who have left the MSM matrix.)
Two, this is a clickbait operation by a scumbag person or group whose method is to present themselves (project the image) of being a big, legitimate operation, associated directly with CNBC.
#Discussion:
I don't see ANY clickbait advertising on the website, which indicate that it is funded. By who? Cannot know without further digging. But simply being funded in itself indicates the motive is not clickbait money making.
Why would this website suddenly post an explosive article about Pascal Najadi, out of synch with all its other stories and activities?
A third possibility might be that the operation is a White Hat sleeper operation, put in place to be activated to promote certain types of narrative deployments, which possibly the Najadi narrative is (although I remain skeptical at this point).
A fourth possibility might be that its just some band of anons-type tiny group who are doing their own operation clandestinely but for good purposes. This is highly unlikely, I think, however, considering that the website looks funded and the size and timeline of the operation seems too large for anyone less than a very wealthy batman-type persona.
Either way, this website is NOT what it portrays itself as. So the key question is: WHY?
Based on the above (even superficial) dig, I would be 100% suspicious of this website and ANYTHING they publish.
If you read the article, read it with a high degree of skepticism, and ask yourself:
are there elements / narratives / data in here that are seeking to manipulate me, in my thinking or emotional response?
Is there disinfo nestled in among the fact-based info?
what biases might the article be seeking to possibly exploit?
I read today on one researcher's post this idea: always ask questions. If you keep asking questions, the truth will eventually emerge.
So, don't just swallowing this article because it seems to say all the right things (plays to one's biases, etc), ask and be skeptical. Because there are ALWAYS forces out there seeking to derail us, and mental and emotional vigilance is the price of freedom of thought.
Disclaimer: I haven't gone through the article itself. The information MAY be legit, but I have serious doubts about the sauce, however. So I'm skeptical off the bat.
Thanks to u/The3rdkey who raised the heads up.
Also, kudos to u/winn (OP) who wrote: "This is some weird shit..."
You're right about that, buddy!
What do pedes think about the article?
What about the Najadi narrative, that has burst on the scenes in recent weeks, apparently with all the kinds of things awakened frogs would like to hear?
Are you skeptical? Are you convinced? What convinces you? What data points is your attention drawn to?
Thanks to u/redlotus69 who posted about Ramaswarmy 'dropping out' of the race (even though he says 'suspending' my campaign). Speech (2-minute clip)
It gave me an opportunity to directly watch Vivek in action. To be honest, I haven't been paying much close attention to Vivek, apart from listening to analysis and views around him, and of course that excellent post by u/Neverstoptrumping :
We read Trumps TS post. Vivek is not MAGA. Sources listed below to help others understand
I recommended this post if you want some well-sourced factual information about Ramaswamy.
So anyway, I decided to actually listen to his speech as presented by NBC in the article linked by redlotus69, and boy oh boy. All I can say is Wow!!!
In early 2016, when I decided to listen to a few Trump speeches, I was immediately blown away by the authenticity and directness that Trump exuded, unlike ANY politician I have ever heard. In fact, unlike ALL the politicians, he struck me as being completely the real deal. The vibe was unmistakeable.
Listening to Vivek Swampy directly is a similar experience, except inverted. Instantly, Swampy seems so utterly polished, contrived, someone acting a role, by which I mean, almost all politicians play the role of [politician's image].
Tuning in to his facial expressions, eye movements, etc, I can see now why so many based Pedes have been likening him to Obama.
Same polished turd. It may be polished, but it's a turd. (Pardon my French.)
What a total charlatan. And he's right out there, his target audience being normies who think Trump has some good points, but who are still plugged in and feeding off of the mainstream narrative machine. Those who failed to recognize the TRUE nature of Donald Trump as a man, as a President, as a patriot, and who still believe the fake political behavior still advocated by the swamp creatures from left, right and center.
"We had to recognize there is no way for me to become president absent [things we don't want to see happen] in this country...."
Translation: "There's no way for me to become President unless the Cabal assassinates Donald Trump, but then, obviously I am the one who should be President!!!!"
<insert expression with (feigned) deep and serious concern>
Having had training in Hypnosis and NLP techniques, I find Swampy's methods here are so transparent. What he is doing is embedding a proposition, not out in the open, but slipping it under the rug.
ALL of his talking points are perfectly crafted for his maga and conservative audience.
"We have done everything in our part.... to make.... everyone of us in this room has done our part...."
Clearly rehearsed, then fluffed, muddling the expressions "done everything in our power..." and saying part instead, and then its like, oops, cannot focus on [we] (aka my backers, masters, etc) - have to make it about the common folsk, the people here, so he switches mid-sentence to "everyone of us in this room has done our part".
"to save this country..."
They all did their part to save the country? So, its over? They have no more part to do? Them campaigning for Swampy is equivalent to 'doing our part to save this country'???
Jeepers.
If you train in NLP & hypnosis, etc, you automatically watch people's eye movements, as they are most often indicators of which part of the brain/mind people are accessing when they speak, etc.
Watch Swampy's eye movements and how they go with his facial expressions.
The blinking when he says "we're a campaign founded on the truth" indicates he's lying, and he know's he is lying. The blinking is a mechanism to insert energy into his facial structure in order to hide and subvert any expression of the lying, which given free rein will naturally show.
"And I'm also making the decision..."
At key moments in his statements, he looks away, down, anywhere but directly at the people watching him. Clear giveaway. He's not really communicating with his audience openly and heart to heart. (Like Trump would, for example) He's telling a story, presenting an image that is other than who or what he really is.
"There are TWO America first candidates in this campaign...."
In other words, associating himself with Trump. Look! I'm with Trump. He and me are the two real America first candidates.
Blatant example of attempting to win points by association. What does DJT think? "Swampy is not Maga"
This is what corrupt politicians do. They spin, they create an image essentially to swindle voters in to supporting them.
"and now he will have my full endorsements for the Presidency...."
As if Trump needs Swampy's endorsement???? Give me a break.
A core part of the Q operation was dropping drops that inspired or sometimes directed anons to question, ask, poke around, and to essentially break free from the group think matrix.
This requires not only waking up to external information, but also an internal awakening, where we discover and confront our own prejudices, preconceptions, thinking methods and see how and where we have internalized the internal matrix. Combining these brings discernment towards truth, something you cannot develop simply with external information alone.
If someone cannot see the swamp in Vivek Swampy, I encourage them to dig a little deeper or a lot deeper.
If your eyes are open, it's so bleedingly obvious who this man is.
Note: the above is an opinion. No pedes were harmed in the making of this post.
Sing to the tune of send in the clowns (special babbs version)
Am I a snitch?
With purple hair?
Epstein at last on the ground,
Bill flew mid-air,
Send in the clowns.
What did I miss?
I don’t really care.
Orange man bad (all the time),
with reeeees I declare,
Where are the clowns?
Aren’t the CIA clowns?
Just when I'd hope that Trump was all done,
Two twenty-four hits us then, he’s making his run.
Here comes more evidence, but not what I need.
What’s that with diamonds
On my Twitter feed?
Am I a farce?
Am I so lame?
I thought that Trump man and Epstein
must be the same!
But where are the clowns
CNN promised clowns
Oh, bother, I’m here….
What of Seth rich?
Obama is queer?
What's with the timing, is this now the year?
But where are the clowns?
I need some more clowns!
Well, maybe next year? (please?)
From the Babylon Bee!
From the border to the economy, President Biden has accomplished feats in 2023 that no one ever saw coming. With so many incredible achievements for the Biden administration this year, narrowing them down was no easy task! Here are the top ten accomplishments of the Biden administration in 2023:
1. Reduced obesity in America by making food unaffordable: So simple.
2. Cleaned up all the cocaine bags someone was leaving around the White House: Decency restored!
3. Kept American hostages safe from junk fees during their stay with Hamas: Not one single junk fee!
4. Set all-time record for people illegally streaming into the U.S.: Because he's the most popular President ever. Numbers don't lie.
5. Raised dementia awareness by 400%: Also, sandbag awareness.
6. Created record numbers of new billionaires: They're all in Ukraine, but still.
7. Promoted transparency by releasing several "Behind-the-Scenes" videos from Capitol staffers: Campaign promise, delivered.
8. Saved democracy by arresting political opponents and not allowing people to vote for anyone else: Thanks, Joe!
9. Set new record by spending 40% of time on vacation: Finally giving Delaware Beach the attention it so richly deserves.
10. Heroically stayed alive to save America from a Kamala Harris Presidency: We salute you, Mr. Biden!
What can't Biden do?? We can't wait to see what Joe has up his sleeve in 2024!
Sauce: https://babylonbee.com/news/the-biden-administrations-top-10-accomplishments-of-2023
Around this time, many of us naturally reflect on and concentrate on a relationship with Christ. Many of us will also be reflecting on aspects of our own faith (whether it is Christian or otherwise) and our relationships with our families.
I'd like to offer a thought, a reflection on these things, and what it means to live and practice love.
Faith and Love
If Christ comes to save the world, his salvation is accomplished through love. Meaning that faith is doorway to love, and it is love that binds us to Him and brings us closer to him. Faith is the doorway. Faith is the entry point. Faith that recognize Jesus' significance, important and role in the life of humanity is the beginning point of Christ-centered love.
Faith is what brings one to the door, and which opens the door to Christ, but once you walk through that doorway and engage with Christ, that faith is perfected and consummated in a relationship of love. Can you love someone if you do not believe in them? No. Faith opens the heart; an open heart allows love to be received and to be given.
Who Does Christ Love the Most
So what kind of love is Christ's love? What, or who, does Christ love the most? Although Christ's love is transcendent and absolute, we ourselves are not absolute. We live in a condition where our hearts, and our love, are relative. Conditional.
The question of who Christ loves the most might seem strange. Surely Christ's love for each and every person is the same, identical. But for love to be fulfilled and reach the completion of it's purpose and intent, it must be received and returned. So the meaning of the question, what, or who, does Christ love the most is in fact this question: who is most able to receive and reciprocate the full, abiding and perfect love of Christ?
The more of Christ's love we receive and the more we give our hearts to him in return, the more deeply, the more fully, Christ's own love fulfills its potential and capacity. In other words, the deeper the relationship, the more that the love flows two ways; we receive his love, and he receives ours.
In terms of one's aspiration to follow Christ, to unite with Christ, to align with and become an instrument of Christ, this question of who can receive Christ's love the most becomes relevant. If you have no such aspiration, then perhaps it's not so relevant.
The Difference Between Christ's Heart and Our Heart
Our hearts are relative. We naturally aspire to love as the way that Christ loves, but how can we do that? The relative heart, the imperfect heart, that heart focuses on that which is closest to us. We love our family the most. Next, we love our community, those around us. Next, we may love our state, prefecture, our home town. We may also love our nation. Our love tends to expand out from ourselves to those things WE care about.
But is this how Christ's love works? Does Christ love your family more than he loves other families? Does Christ love your home town more than he loves any other person's home town? Does Christ love your nation more than other nations, or your people more than other's peoples?
No, that is not how Christ's love works. Christ loves each nation, loves each people, loves each home town and each family. Christ's love is unbounded and is not attached to self.
So how can we resonate with Christ's love, when our love is limited, conditional, focused on OUR concerns more than others, and our hearts are so naturally self-bound?
To rise up to Christ's level, and experience his heart as our own, we have to transcend our own limitations, our own concerns, our own focus. That involves a form of sacrifice, a sacrifice the nature of which Jesus showed with his own practice and course of life.
Jesus's Love Increased The Further it Extended
If Jesus had not stepped up to fulfill his mission, would his family, mother and brothers, think he was crazy? No. So why did he do it? Because Jesus loved his people more than his own family.
And if Jesus had not stepped up to fulfill his mission, telling the truth, would the people of Jerusalem have rejected him? No. So why did he do it? Because he loved his people more than he loved Jerusalem.
And if Jesus had not stepped up to walk the way of the cross, would his people, his nation, have rejected him? No. So why did he do it? Because he loved humanity more than he loved his own people.
This is the secret of Jesus' love, of Christ's love: to love the world more than you love your nation, to love your nation more than you love your own people, to love your people more than you love your own family, and to love your own family more than you love yourself. This capacity of Christ's heart for his love to increase the higher the dimension or the greater the scope of the object of love, this is Christ's love and heart.
How To Strike a Resonance With Christ's Love
This then is one secret, if not the secret, to finding Christ's heart and resonating with Christ's love, to have the greatest capacity to receive His love, and in that capacity, to enter into the greatest potential of unity with Christ:
To love each family as if it is your own family. To love each people as if they are your own people. To love each nation as if it is your nation. To love the world, humanity, above all.
This is not easy to do. Our limited, conditional and self-bound heart resists this path. And it is that self-bound heart that is the target that the devil continually seeks to latch on to, constantly seeks to stimulate within us and drag us down and away from Christ's love and heart, which transcends.
And yet, this is the path. So how to detach from our self-bound heart and connect with Christ's transcendent heart? In short, the key is sacrifice. Just as Jesus sacrificed his family for his people, and sacrificed his people for the world, and sacrificed himself for all.
In practice, how can we do this?
Ideally, if you are able to, in practice, love three nations concretely as if they are your own, with that same full measure of heart you give to your own nation, then in practice, you will achieve that higher resonance with Christ in that dimension.
If you are able to live with three peoples, and love those peoples with a pure heart as if they are your own people, with the same measure of love, then you will achieve that higher level of resonance with Christ on that same dimension.
If you are able to love three families, and serve them, as if they are your own family, with the same or greater measure of love you have for your own family, then you will achieve that higher resonance with Christ's love on that same dimension.
It's important to note here that it is about achieving a level or quality of love. For this, a period of time is required. It cannot be accomplished in a day, but it can be accomplished over a period of time, be it three months, or three years, or seven years, or forty years, etc. And once it is accomplished, once that level of love is invested and accomplished, it can never be lost.
Once you accomplish it, and offer it to God, then it is preserved for ever. You will have demonstrated, in the flesh, in substance, that you can love ANY nation, ANY people, ANY family as you can your own.
Practicing The Model Through Prayer
But this is not easy. Families, perhaps yes. But peoples? Nations?
In my own case, I felt called at the ripe age of 18 to love my nation with a full heart, but soon after, I felt God call me to sacrifice that love of nation and to love the world. To do that, I had to entrust my parents and siblings to God, and devote myself to that higher calling.
Over the course of my experience, I found myself living among three different peoples in three other nations not my own. Finally, at the end of more than two decades, God brought me back home and told me to love my family and love my nation fully.
But this is not easy and not everyone's path, either. So what to do?
There is a short cut to this, through prayer. Set yourself a period of time, and in your prayer, practice this principle of sacrificing your own [ ] and loving other's [ ] more. Pray like this:
God, I love my country, but you love all countries just as much as you love mine. So God, please bless and protect [three countries]. Please take care of them, and guide them, and watch over them.
Then, pray also for your own country.
*The key is to first prayer for those other (three or more) nations, and THEN after that pray for your own. Pray for those nations as if they are yours. Invest your heart in your prayer for them, and only after that, then prayer for your own nation. Then, apply the same principle to your people, your community, your family, etc.
E.g. When you pray for your people, pray like this:
God, I love my people, but you love all peoples just as much as you love mine. So God, please bless and protect [three peoples]. Please take care of them, and guide them, and watch over them.
Then, pray also for your own people.
When you pray for your family, or your spouse, or your parents, or your children, pray like this:
God, I love my [spouse/parents/family], but you love all [husbands/wives/parents/families] just as much as you love mine. So God, please bless and protect [three other people's [spouse/parents/family]. Please take care of them, and guide them, and watch over them.
Then, pray also for your own husband or wife, parents or family, etc.
You can pray in specifics, if you know the situation of these other three nations, peoples or families, etc.
Letting the Self Die and Christ's Heart Love
If you determine to do this over a period of time, you will find that your heart increases in its capacity to love, and you will come feel Christ's heart more towards these other nations, peoples, communities, families, etc.; You will come to recognize Christ's own love for those who are not close to you, and even for those who seem to have no connection with you. In this way, you can increase your capacity to love the way Christ loves, and experience Christ's unlimited, unconditional and transcendental heart.
Also, and this is important, your capacity to love your own nation, your own people and your own family will grow from that limited, conditional love into the love of Christ, the love that Christ actually feels for YOUR nation, for YOUR people, for YOUR family/spouse/parents, etc.
Moreover, in this way, your capacity to receive Christ's love - that unconditional, unlimited, not self-bound but god-bound love, will grow too.
It is hard to love another nation or people as if they are your own, or more than your own. But when you do, either in practice or in prayer, you allow the self-bound dimensions of love in your heart to die, and you will then come to love your own nation and people with God's transcendent love, NOT because they are precious to you, but because they are precious to God.
In sacrifice the self dies, but is then reborn to love more purely, more fully.
In Practice
Ultimately, God gave your your family, your people, your nation to you for you to love and give yourself to, but to be able to do this truly, and fully, your self-bound love needs to die and be reborn as God-bound love, where the love increases the further it extends (and not the other way around).
Your heart should naturally love your nation more than your family, but there are many individuals who ALSO are part of your nation, and unless you are a President, it is hard to love the whole nation in a practical way. But in your family, there is only one YOU to care for and love them.
The more your love becomes God-bound love, expanding love, the more God will be able to entrust your family, people, nation to you. God will recognize that you love these things, your family, your spouse, your community, your people or your nation, not because of your own attachment, but because of God's love for them.
How do you think God would feel? Don't you think God would feel fulfilled? Joyful? For a father, there is no greater joy than to see his son or daughter who emulates or embodies or even magnifies his own love for others.
This is the way to become someone that God truly treasures. Not because his love for you is greater than his love for your brother or friend, but because YOU become able to receive his love more deeply, more profoundly, and to resonate with him more, and return greater love to Him.
In my view and experience, this is the practical way to allow the self-bound nature die and connect with Christ's transcending love.
Remember: Whatever the date, every day is Christ's birthday. And yours, if you so choose. Merry Christ-mass.
Tonight, I watched Die Hard 2 with my boys. (yes!) I was inspired to write this post by the music at the end of the film: Finlandia.
This is My Song (Music: Finlandia by Jean Sibelius)
This is my song, O God of all the nations,
a song of peace for lands afar and mine;
this is my home, the country where my heart is;
here are my hopes, my dreams, my holy shrine:
but other hearts in other lands are beating
with hopes and dreams as true and high as mine.
My country’s skies are bluer than the ocean,
and sunlight beams on cloverleaf and pine;
but other lands have sunlight too, and clover,
and skies are everywhere as blue as mine:
O hear my song, thou God of all the nations,
a song of peace for their land and for mine.
Stanzas One and Two Lyrics by Lloyd Stone