Ten are dead and three are injured after suspected white supremacist, 18, in military uniform with 'n****r' scrawled on his rifle livestreams mass shooting at Buffalo supermarket in black area
At least 10 people were killed and three were reported injured after a gunman opened fire inside a Buffalo supermarket on Saturday while livestreaming
Payton Gendron, 18, had the n-word scrawled on his rifle, targeted a store in a predominantly black area and shot 11 black people, police said
The suspect, filmed wearing a military uniform, has been taken into custody by the Buffalo Police Department and will be charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder as early as Saturday night
The suspect was reportedly wearing body armor as witnesses said they saw the man wearing a black helmet and carrying a rifle into the store
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Buffalo native, said the state is providing assistance to the Buffalo Police Department
N-word could be seen written on the front sight of gunman's automatic rifle
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
A series of toots regarding air-sub communication prompted me to post about this subject. This is relevant given the communications capabilities of one of the aircraft that performs this role.
I have some knowledge of this particular platform from my days in aerospace. So here we go, another recycled thread!
THREAD
Recollections and Speculations Regarding the E-6B Mercury.
1 1h
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Background: I worked on updating an E-6B training system for the US Navy circa 2009-2010 when I worked at Boeing. My part was small yet significant to the overall project. Moreover, it was informative since I didn't know much about this particular aircraft. In other words it was an interesting learning experience, some of which I will recount now.
1 1h
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
So...
You down wit E-6B? Yeah, you know me!
1 59m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
This particular effort was to add a Digital Flight Data Acquisition Unit (DFDAU) and it's associated updates to the E-6B. The DFDAU isn't the "Black Box" that is typically located in the tail. It is located in the Forward Lower Lobe of the aircraft close to the cockpit. The DFDAU...acquires flight data on the aircraft and sends selected parameters to the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) in the tail.
1 59m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
So to summarize:
DFDAU: In fusalage near cockpit. Weighs almost nothing and is painted dark gray. FDR: In the tail; VERY heavy and painted orange.
1 58m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
PRO TIP: DON'T DROP THE FDR! It won't harm the FDR if the drop is anything less than 36,000 feet, but whatever it lands on won't fare well.
1 58m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
My role was to update the MOMIs (Manual Of Maintenance Instructions) for the device. This was a series of about two dozen volume of everything you ever wanted to know about an E-6B maintenance training device but were afraid to ask. As an aside, this is where I became an Expert at Word. No brag, just fact.
1 58m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
So I did a lot of updating, editing, and other technical writing activities for this project. Also facilitated a fair number of peer review sessions between engineering communities. Billed about half my hours to the project for over 18 months, it kept a lot of us busy.
The aircraft itself is almost unknown but is impressive.
1 58m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
The airframes were the last 707/C-135 ones built, rolling out of Renton back in the early 90s. Nothing noteworthy except that they have the same CFM-56 engines as the 737 and other late-model E-3s and KC-135Rs. It what is inside that makes all the difference.
1 57m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
The E-6 is a command and communications aircraft that was designed for the Take Charge and Move Out (TACAMO) mission for the US Navy. Back in the 60s, the US Navy needed a way to communicate with their SSBNs (Boomers) in the event of nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Originally, converted C-130s served this role but when their service life came to an end...in came the E-6A.
No, that was not a typo!
1 57m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
The E-6A Hermes could communicate with USN SSBNs. Later, it was upgraded to the E-6B Mercury, which received a glass cockpit like the 737. The bigger change was receiving the communications equipment to launch USAF ICMBs. The E-6B took over the LOOKING GLASS mission from USAF EC-135s circa 1998 and continues to this day.
1 57m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
That means the E-6B has Ultra-Low Frequency radios that can communicate with submerged subs via a 4km antenna. It also has all the necessary equipment to communicate with USAF ICBM sites located on land. That means it has multiple sets of gear that work together. You see where this is going? It gets better...
1 56m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Not only can it communicate with both ballistic missile launch systems (land and sea-based), it can talk to just about any other military communication system. Think of it as a big flying switchboard that can take calls from almost any radio-based system. This makes it useful not just during a nuclear war, but during operations between various branches of the US military (.gov too?).
1 56m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
I'm not privy to the details of these systems, but I have it on good authority that the E-6B is one of the ultimate pieces of military communications hardware on planet Earth.
1 56m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
The normal operational plan would be for two planes to be up at all times, one over the Atlantic and one over the Pacific. For quite a while though, only one would be flying at a time; slowly orbiting and waiting for a signal nobody wants to receive.
1 55m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Before, during, and after the election though; these aircraft have been flying over land and especially...population centers.
Why?
1 55m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
SPECULATION
I think these aircraft are being used to coordinate, gather, and transmit information for ongoing military operations taking place over CONUS. They could also be working with other .gov agencies too but I am less sure of that. Regardless, this mission makes sense in light of the aircraft's capabilities. They probably won't be used for bulk collection and transmission, but for secure short-term missions; it makes sense.
1 54m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
After all; you have USAF, USN, Army, USMS, and Coast Guard (!) aircraft flying all over the CONUS at a relatively high operational tempo. Need to coordinate it all? The E-6B is on-deck to handle that mission.
1 54m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Oh, have sensitive data that you don't want to send over civilian networks? Oh, the E-6B can help you out there too. Securely too!
1+ 54m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Need to coordinate thousands of small, independent .mil and .gov teams for critical missions? Well, you now know who is able to help out...
1 54m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Normally, we would not see these aircraft over land unless they were on their way to their patrol areas over water. Yet, these are not normal times. Their flight paths show this and the fact civilians like us can see that is a bit of a clue. Aircraft can turn off their transponders and/or transmit false data at the flick of a switch. That this information is available is telling. No fear on the part of .mil it seems.
1 54m
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
Where this leads, I have no idea. We are seeing highly unusual flight activity though during a demonstrably non-normal time. Devolution and the associated CONPLANs are looking more likely to me as time goes by. We definitely live in interesting times.
END
1+
Dave's Not Here! ⭐⭐⭐ @[email protected] Follow @SLAG @Andre @Teeeye81
ADDENDUM
A few of the old-timers told me a bit more about the capabilities of the aircraft and its relevance. Back when I was at Boeing the focus was on the GWOT, not thermonuclear war or a shadow WW3 as some have discussed here. The secret sauce in the E-6B is it's ability to communicate with all US (and presumably allied) systems in a secure manner. That's a unique and expensive capability that can come in handy in many different missions.
December 21, 2021, 4:23 PM · · Web · 0 · 1 · 2
https://nypost.com/2021/12/11/fordham-prof-fired-for-confusing-two-black-students-in-class/
This cucked leftist prof got a good screwin without a kiss.
I think he was pushed out instead of resigning. I have no sauce for this it is just an opinion. But based on what has happened at CNN, I think there's trouble brewing for some of these news Hippocrates. Two things I know for sure are that there will be numerous repeat threads started about this, and inevitably one of the threads will start as a headline "While you assholes were distracted by the Wallace resignation, this is what was really happening" Of course with no sauce and an absolute nothing burger.
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-14
Special “Thank you’s” for this article go to:
The Kate Awakening - Telegram: https://t.me/thekateawakening
A. C. Harmony
“Sandra Anonymous”
Patrick Gunnels
This article is going to have a different vibe than the previous articles in my Devolution. I won’t be focusing on the actual Devolution operation, but instead on someone who has emerged as the key figure in common among the institutions and organizations that have gone all-in in attacking Trump.
continued in the link
SLAG @[email protected] @Learning2Human @Andre @h53pilot @DuaneCates @justhuman @JFAnon
Well look at that…
On January 20, there were TWO footballs & launch cards. Mostly because Trump was at a different physical location.
But don’t worry, NYT…
We all know Biden got the actual launch codes and football, right?
RIGHT?
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency-part-ii?justPublished=true
The Wartime Presidency Part II The Government in Exile
SLAG 4 hr ago 13 9 The Trump administration “officially” came to a end on January 20, 2021 at 12:00 EST.
The deep state breathed a sigh of relief. That troublesome orange man was gone from “their” town and the government could finally get back to its primary mission - making all of them rich.
This was supposed to be the end.
No more Trump.
No more MAGA.
No more ordinary Americans interfering with their plans.
Only that’s not what happened, was it?
MAGA grew - coalescing under alternative social media platforms.
The Biden administration ran into serious competence problems.
And, most irritating of all, Trump started issuing these press statements like he was still President!!
Serious things are afoot - the deep state is starting to realize how much trouble they’ve stumbled into, and they’re realizing they’re deep in the jaws of a trap.
In this article, we’re going to answer the following questions;
What’s Trump been doing since January?
Why might his return have to be extra-constitutional?
Aside: Before we go any further, I’ll remind everyone that this is a fail safe plan in the event other avenues fail. I’ve noticed things that mirror WW2 events that may provide a hint at what’s going on and what might be next.
This also doesn’t mean that I’m right and other authors are wrong - aspects of everyone’s postulations could prove to be true. These are mine - I thank you in advance for your attention.
Let’s step back to our WW2 framework that’s a hallmark of this article series.
A few hours after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Empire of Japan invaded the Philippines at Bataan Island.
President Manuel L. Quezon immediately rushed to Manila on December 8 despite an illness.
December 16, 1941: President Quezon signs Commonwealth Act No. 671. Legally passed by the Philippine Legislature before the fall of Manila, Act No. 671 was an emergency declaration that authorized the Philippine President to assume extraordinary powers to institute whatever rules and regulations he saw fit to carry out the National Policy.
In other words, the Philippine government knew it was going to fall to the Empire of Japan - so it placed all of its authority in one trusted individual in hopes that as long as that individual survived, so alsowould the legitimate government of the Philippines.
Key point: this was a legal action by the Philippine government to protect itself in dire times.
General Douglas MacArthur sent some of the PT-boat fleet that evacuated him back to the Philippines after his party was on its way to Australia. PT-41 picked up the Quezon party and ferried them to Oroquieta in the Province of Misamis. The Quezon party escaped the Province of Misamis on B-17 bombers which left the Del Monte corporation’s private airfield to make the hop to Australia.
President Quezon communicated with President Roosevelt and requested that the remains of his government should be in Washington DC to conduct matters of state there.
Roosevelt agreed.
The SS President Coolidge left Melbourne Australia on April 20, 1942 under escort by the Cruiser USS St. Louis, and transported the Quezon party to San Francisco, California. They arrived on May 8, 1942 and were met by President Roosevelt in Washington 5 days later.
On May 14, 1942, a luncheon was hosted at the White House where the Government of the United States of America formally recognized the government in exile of the Philippines.
Aside: that official diplomatic recognition by the United States of the government-in-exile of the Philippines was extremely important. We will be coming back to that in a minute.
From May 14, 1942 to February 27, 1945 The Philippine government in exile did not sit on its laurels in DC.
Far from it.
They went around the United States and helped to sell war bonds. They helped to promote the Filipino culture in the United States, they even published a magazine. They participated in the United Nations. They went all out to support the American war effort and President Roosevelt - doing so was vital to getting the Philippines liberated by American forces in 1945.
One of the most important things they did was broadcast a radio message of hope into the occupied nation of the Philippines, and the Empire of Japan was powerless to stop it.
President Manuel L. Quezon died of tuberculosis on August 1, 1944. Vice President Sergio Osmeña was sworn in as President of the Philippines, and assumed the presidency of the reinstated government of the Philippines once the Philippine islands were liberated by US forces.
Now, let’s see what Donald J Trump has been doing;
You’re going to love where this is going.
Issue One: The the notorious P-E-A-D-S
We don’t know what’s exactly in these PEADS (Presidential Emergency Action DocumentS), but I’m 90% sure what was in one;
One of the PEADS activated was an emergency declaration that vested all power of the Chief Executive and whatever Legislative Powers deemed necessary by that trusted person to lead the government-in-exile - AKA the COG or Continuation Of Government. Who was that person?
Donald John Trump
If this sounds a lot like Commonwealth Act No. 671 to you, you would be correct. Act No. 671 is how governments behave before they are overrun and captured by an enemy. I’ll remind you that Trump knew there was rampant election fraud happening - it was observed in 2018 during the midterms. (Note: General Nakasone is the director of the NSA - that’s a rather odd statement to make on Election Day, isn’t it?)
The possibility election fraud would be used to try and unseat him from the White House was a foregone conclusion.
I’ll give you a guess on what went down with one of these PEADS;
Sometime before the election, a PEAD was drafted that would transfer all governing authority to the President of the United States upon a triggering event. That triggering event was proof of a foreign government directly or indirectly colluding with election officials to change the outcome of the election.
On the late evening of November 3, 2020 counting was intentionally stopped with hours of useable time left to finish the count. November 4, 2020 on or around 04:00 that morning - fraudulent votes were delivered to key ballot counting locations in GA, PA, MI, WI, and AZ. When those made-to-order fraudulent votes were added to the total, they pushed Joe Biden over the margin of victory - barely.
Joseph R. Biden was declared the “winner”.
While all this fraud was going on, the US Military was monitoring the election. (Remember General Nakasone’s tweet?) Election infrastructure was absorbed into critical infrastructure as part of the DHS in 2017 - and the foreign involvement made it a national security issue. The military discovered evidence that a enemy government assisted domestic agents with stealing the election…and that discovery triggered the PEAD.
THIS is the PEAD that - for all intents and purposes - activated devolution. But here’s the thing, we haven’t been thinking big enough.
Remember our history lesson about the government-in-exile of the Philippines. Commonwealth Act No. 671 vested all governing authority of the Philippines into one man, President Manuel L. Quezon.
What if this PEAD did the same thing and now all governing authority for the United States of America now rests in the hands of Donald J. Trump?
If that happened, and I think it did, Trump and the government of the United States now are the same person.
The timing was critical. The PEAD had to be activated prior to the vote counts that declared Biden the winner. While the Democrats were scrambling and cheating to push their zombie candidate across the finish line, the PEAD was already in place and active.
Trump tricked them all! They were fighting for the prize of the presidency…and didn’t see the PEAD snatch the trophy off the table just before they declared themselves the “winner” - Checkmate!
Issue Two: Mike Pompeo’s odd statement
On November 10, 2020, The Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, said something…odd.
He said “We would be transitioning to a second Trump Presidency.”
Also:
We’re ready
The world is watching
We’re going to court ALL the votes
There will be electors selected
There’s a process - and the constitution spells it out pretty clearly
The world should have every confidence that the transition necessary that the State department is functional today, is successful today, and will be successful with the President who is sworn in on January 20th, a minute after noon will also be successful.
Here are Secretary Pompeo’s words if you wish to hear them for yourself:
Now…the MSM had a good laugh at this - accusing Pompeo of fueling the “unfounded” claims of election fraud.
Too bad for them - the meat of what he was saying went right over their heads.
Let’s examine this statement made by Pompeo through the lens of a government-in-exile;
We will be transitioning to a 2nd Trump presidency - he won the election, but the nation was invaded. Does this still mean he’s the President? Yes. Was Manuel L. Quezon still President of the Philippines after Manila fell? Yes he was. What if Secretary Pompeo was hinting at a presidency-in-exile?
We’re ready - All the PEADS are written and EO’s cut. We have everything we need to conduct business as a government-in-exile
The world is watching - You bet they are. VERY closely.
We’re going to court ALL the votes - we will need these later to PROVE the election was stolen. In fact, they were probably all counted days before Pompeo made this statement. Or, there was hard evidence that a foreign nation meddled in the election - if the true vote count was corrupted, this would be the evidence that Biden was not the winner.
There will be electors selected - yes, because these were needed to secure Trumps presidency-in-exile in full compliance with the law. Remember that the electors are Trump’s people - they may have easily signed NDA’s. Of course, that’s if they were even needed. The PEAD would allow Trump to suspend elections in order to save the nation if he deemed it necessary.
There’s a process - and the constitution spells it out pretty clearly - yes it does. We count votes, select electors, elect a President. However, the constitution also gives the President power to act in the event of emergencies and invasion. Once the PEAD was activated that vested governing authority in the current President (Trump), that President could have suspended elections - legally. This is why the timing was critical. The evidence triggering the PEAD had to be uncovered prior to the vote counts being complete and Biden declared winner.
The world should have every confidence that the transition necessary that the State department is functional today, is successful today, and will be successful with the President who is sworn in on January 20th, a minute after noon will also be successful. - did you catch the subtle reference to TWO different state departments? Will be successful…will also be successful. Why would America have or need two state departments?
Do you see how Mike Pompeo’s comments make much more sense when viewed through the lens of a government-in-exile?
I can’t stress enough how important this PEAD was. If it created a government-in-exile, Trump could legally suspend elections;
The selection of electors, the vote count on January 6, the theater, the drama…none of it mattered. It was all a distraction.
Did the swearing in of the puppet government in the Philippines matter after Commonwealth Act No. 671?
No - it didn’t. Act No. 671 protected the nation of the Philippines from its Japanese overlords.
The PEAD did the same!
Issue Three: The statements from The 45th President of the United States
On January 25, 2021, the Office of Donald J Trump issued its first press release, on presidential looking letterhead.
https://www.45office.com/news/statement-from-the-office-of-the-former-president
Nothing to see here…just a “former” government issuing press releases.
Just like the government-in-exile of the Philippines did 80 years ago.
Also, Trump has been holding meetings with his cabinet.
On July 30, 2021 Mark Meadows, Trump’s former Chief of Staff said Trump met with his cabinet at his New Jersey golf course.
Apoplectic, the press threw around accusations of Trump running a “shadow presidency”. They later dismissed the thought as fantasy; after all, there’s no possible way Trump was President, so what’s the harm in him having a fantasy meeting with his former cabinet?
Just like the government-in-exile of the Philippines did 80 years ago.
Lastly, the Trump administration seems to be conducting diplomatic operations.
Rick Grinnell went to the Balkans as a “special envoy” to broker peace between Serbia and Croatia, and to try to integrate the two economies.
Remember how I mentioned that Secretary Pompeo told the press on November 10, 2020 that there were going to be two state departments? Here’s evidence of that second state department at work in real time!
This is merely one example. Jarad Kitchener and Mike Pompeo also have had recent international travel plans, haven’t they?
Leftists howl about how Trump is willfully violating the Logan act…but that assumes that Trump isn’t the President. What if he is meeting with foreign leaders and officials as part of his official diplomatic duties as the President of the government-in-exile?
Also, remember from our history lesson that official diplomatic recognition by the United States was critical to the government-in-exile of the Philippines?
could Trump be seeking the same with select world leaders?
Just like the government-in-exile of the Philippines did 80 years ago.
Are you seeing a pattern here? I think the case can be made that Trump is still the President, and he’s managing a government-in-exile.
Which brings us to our next question;
Why might Trump’s return have to be extra-constitutional?
Answer: Because it doesn’t need to be.
The United States was invaded as I explained in Part 1 of this series.
A PEAD was activated by the emergency situation that placed the power of the US Government into the custody of one man, Donald J Trump.
The Empire of Japan ruled the Philippines…until they didn’t.
Joseph R. Biden is the 46th President of the United States of America…until he’s not.
Once the invaders are removed from power, Trump will be returned to the White House - because that’s following the law. From there, he will resume his presidency and (probably) elections will be held to reconstitute the US government and end the PEAD. What’s the dividing line?
Easy.
Did you as a member of Congress or Senator benefit from the election theft?
Continued in link
From @PatelPatriot :
🔥 Devolution - Part 14 🔥
Will be going live today!
The exclusive first read will by Patrick Gunnels will take place at 2 PM EST and the article will be published following the reading.
Links to find the show:
on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/pgunnels
or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cato.censor.92/?show_switched_toast=0
or Odysee: https://odysee.com/My-First-Odysee-Livestream:6f7f5b1aadd3d941c6a9ad807cfdc9e51d4abb6e
pgunnels - Twitch Epic Andre, JF Anon, and SLAG
www.twitch.tv
https://freeatlantis.com/@Andre/107415693647966886
Andre @[email protected] Thread
In response to this thread by @JFAnon:
https://freeatlantis.com/web/statuses/107412929466433320
Which was a response to the first of four chapters of a substack by @SLAG, I wrote this thread:
https://freeatlantis.com/web/statuses/107412929466433320
At the end of that thread, @h53pilot wrote a series of comments that are worthy of their own thread and immediately tempt me to write a response.
I am going to write this thread by quoting @h53pilot and responding as I go along.
I am digging the evolution of this style of a rapid exchange of ideas!
1+ 21h
Andre @[email protected] @h53pilot wrote:
The problem with this theory is that if the MIL could choose Trump, they could also un-choose him when they wanted as well.
Therefore, under this theory, Trump has never been in control of anything. And we have been "devolved" since before Trump was ever selected.
The implications of this are jarring to say the least.
Where is the representative republic in all this? For years, if this theory is correct. They are owners of the federal government AND this mess we're in.
1+ 21h
Andre @[email protected] I do not think that MIL 'chose' Trump in the sense of a coronation. Once it was determined that there was no option save for heading into a Constitutional crisis necessitating a novelty to extract the Republic from the emergency, I'd imagine that a number of prospective candidates for such an unprecedented collaboration were identified, vetted, and ultimately Trump was the one judged most capable of pulling off the role.
Further, and very importantly if this is to be a legal, Constitutional...
TO continue reading this long thread click link
The war within the US military is where the Q war is mainly being fought
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/how-obama-sabotaged-american-military-daniel-greenfield/
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center specializing in investigative reporting on the Left and Islamic terrorism.
Editors' note: This article on the subversion of the American military is one of a series Daniel Greenfield has written on what is probably the greatest and most immediate threat to America’s security and survival. It's a subject surrounded by silence. See the Freedom Center's articles on this issue at its new campaign site, Committee for a Patriotic Military. Also make sure to read Daniel Greenfield's booklet, Disloyal: How the Military Brass is Betraying Our Country.
By the time Barack Obama left office, every branch of the military was smaller than it had been on September 11. But the change in size concealed the true impact of America’s most left-wing president in undermining our national security and weakening us in the face of our enemies.
"I've got a pen, and I've got a phone,” Obama famously boasted. He used the pen to unleash a blizzard of executive orders and memorandums. Some led to outraged protests, but some of his most devastating penned assaults on our nation’s military flew under the radar.
One of those took place during the end of his last year in office. His memorandum, “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce”, created the woke military of the Biden administration by putting identity politics, diversity quotas, and political indoctrination at the heart of the military’s mission.
Obama had always resented the military. Even former General McChrystal, an Obama loyalist fired for describing his boss a little too aptly in the presence of a Rolling Stone reporter, described him as “uncomfortable and intimidated” by generals. But Obama’s parting shot at the military cut the generals down to size by transforming them into community organizers.
His order redefined diversity as the military’s “greatest asset” and reinvented national security as a system for maximizing employment diversity by race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and every identity politics metric, but not the military metrics that truly mattered, readiness, competence, and a willingness to wage war in defense of the homeland.
Along with transforming the military into another quota-based federal employment agency in which skills and capability mattered much less than being a disabled transgender Eskimo, the order also demanded that national security agencies should make "implicit or unconscious bias" training mandatory for "senior leadership and management positions". Divisions that didn't earn sufficiently high IQ (Inclusion Quotient) scores would also be hit with bias training.
Implicit bias training is a form of political indoctrination which asserts that all white people are racist. Its sessions force participants into accepting its radical racial worldview or be treated as obstacles to the new organizational mission. Implicit bias training has succeeded in forcing out talented executives from corporations and officers from the military, replacing them with political activists and bootlickers cowardly enough to repeat Marxist dogma for the sake of their careers.
Obama’s memorandum led to the expansion of implicit bias within the military such as Army Secretary Eric Fanning’s infamous Directive 2017-06 ordering mandatory implicit bias training for “soldiers and employees in senior leadership and management positions” that was protested by chaplains for infringing on religious freedom. While the Trump administration later ordered a ban on such abusive training in the military, by then Obama’s order had long since been circulating in its cultural and organizational bloodstream, and was quickly restarted by Biden.
Biden’s first executive orders not only rescinded the ban, but doubled down on making the military more woke, more racist towards white Americans, and more incapable than ever. The new equity push went even further by attributing any failure to meet racial, gender, and other identity politics quotas to the grand hoax of “systemic racism” –a practice outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Meeting these quotas became the foremost task of senior leadership.
China might beat us in the hypersonic weapons race, but America’s top military brass would pull out all the stops to make sure that they had the most diverse arrangement of people, preferably in senior leadership positions, to establish their progressive credentials.
The ‘wokening’ of the military was not a bottom-up, but a top-down phenomenon, imposed at every step from branch leaders to academy superintendents, after originating from the White House. Obama’s “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce” was one of the final building blocks for his key administration goal of bringing the most conservative arm of the federal government into compliance with the political agendas of the radical Left.
Obama's former NASA administrator, Charles Bolden, had caused a stir when he frankly told Al Jazeera that his boss had given him three top priorities, none of which involved space, but one of which was Muslim self-esteem. No military leader had come out with an equally honest assessment, but Obama’s priorities for the military was looting its physical resources for environmental gimmicks like the Navy’s disastrous biofuels programs, and its human resources for a massive community organizing and Marxist indoctrination effort under the flag of diversity.
Obama didn’t just leave the military smaller in size, but smaller in spirit, its leadership class no longer dedicated to national security, but to the identity political agendas of the radical Left.
By Obama’s second term, male Army ROTC cadets were being forced to march in women’s high heels. The humiliating woke rituals, whose purpose is not the stated one of inclusion, but of exclusion, of demeaning and destroying the morale of the traditional fighting man, continue to hollow out the military readiness of armed services waging a culture war against themselves.
Obama remade the military just as he remade the nation, from a team based on individual worth into a broken system divided by the intractable gulfs of oppressors and the oppressed.
No military organization can function that way and no nation can survive that way.
Obama understood the nature of big government all too well. It’s a lot easier to program a bad leftist idea into the system than to get it out again. Bill Clinton had tried to tame the military through incremental changes, but Obama went for broke by transforming its mission.
By making diversity the mission, politics in the form of diversity and inclusion also became the mission. The new military mandate was to recruit diversity and to purge its opposite, the traditional white males who made up the backbone not only of the leadership, but of active duty combat personnel. Once an apolitical institution on matters beyond its purview, the military adopted leftist politics as its guiding light. The new advisers pushing diversity and inclusion warned the brass that the military could not become truly inclusive unless it adopted identity politics and all the Marxist ideas and anti-American attitudes that came with it.
That’s why Ibram X. Kendi, a disgraceful racist, showed up on reading lists and why Naval officers denounce America as if they were being held captive by the Viet Cong.
The road to our disgrace in Afghanistan was paved by the Obama administration which embraced a policy of military defeatism on the battlefield and in its institutions. Long before the Taliban entered Kabul, the moral struggle had already been lost in Washington D.C.. While the Taliban were carving up Afghanistan, the nation’s military leaders were busy implementing diversity quotas, imposing implicit bias training, and promoting critical race theory.
The brass who had accepted Obama’s diversity mandate began destroying the military in order to save the military. And they kept it up under the Trump administration even when Obama was gone. Any officer who protested was punished, smeared, and forced out. It will take more than a change of administrations to break that vicious cycle. It will take a change of leadership.
Obama fundamentally transformed the military as he did the nation. It must be fundamentally reformed by removing the brass who traded victory for diversity and anti-Trump lunacy. Gen. Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had ranted to aides that President Trump was spreading the "gospel of the Fuhrer'', and defended critical race theory, is proof.
Milley and other failed military and political leaders who have undermined our national defense must go so that the military can return to the fundamentals of national defense.
Otherwise the defeat in Afghanistan may become the first of even worse defeats to come.
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency/comments
The Wartime Presidency SLAG Dec 3 17 20 A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Read →
Write a comment…
JFAnon9 hr ago I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-Election audits
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
Spitball:
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
Most definitely.
11.10.1.1 and 11.10.1.2 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
END
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency/comments
The Wartime Presidency SLAG Dec 3 17 20 A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Read →
Write a comment…
JFAnon9 hr ago I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-Election audits
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
Spitball:
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
Most definitely.
11.10.1.1 and 11.10.1.2 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
END
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency/comments
The Wartime Presidency SLAG Dec 3 17 20 A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Read →
Write a comment…
JFAnon9 hr ago I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-Election audits
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
Spitball:
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
Most definitely.
11.10.1.1 and 11.10.1.2 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
END
Interesting reading. https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency-part-i?justPublished=true