Hi there! Looking for some help. Attending my first rally. It says the ABQ, NM rally is 12pm. Search engine floods with MSM BS whenever i try to find any info online.
So the opening speakers start at 12pm? Or doors open?
When would I be expecting to finish and leave?
What time should I arrive to get a spot?
I got a Airbnb nearby the rally. Is that a good idea or actually bad idea
Any other advice? Ive read to bring disposable chairs and food.
Much appreciated
The American Flag is being raided to become no longer existent on r/place.
r/place Is a canvas seen by millions, where people express whats important to them
I know it may seem trivial, but the world should know that there are indeed many people who are PRO USA.
https://www.reddit.com/r/place/?cx=430&cy=497&px=170
help us out and keep the american flag's integrity
At the airport, do they just need to see the vaccine card, and thats good enough evidence for them? Or do they double check your card against a database?
Any recent travelers? planning on a turkey georgia armenia trip.
This is under the assumption that
- patriots are in control, not biden.
- we may need to do a re-vote in 2021+
- white hats will inevitably step-ladder us off the masks and distancing.
We may have to wait for the general public to be maskless, no more social distancing, if we want to have a fair election.
Otherwise having the excuse to mass mail-in vote again will cause either election fraud again, or if trump wins, then theyll say he did fraud. (as hypocritical as that sounds)
Also a fair re-vote will be another red-pill to show that we indeed are the majority voters, and that indeed, biden cheated.
this shifts the public narrative in a way that cant be denied.
whitehats may not want to just put trump in power based on the 2020 true election results, because although we'd love it, so many people are so brainwashed about the election results that they will not accept that as fair.
we need something that will prove to them with a smack in the face that says "BAM. we were right all along."
Are there any protocols for what they do in case of a president that falls that anyone knows of? Im assuming there is, and that the protocol would be to help him.
If so, this would be another evidence for the fake presidency. Thoughts ?
All over GAW people have been posting the war castles videos, and about russell jay gould.
I wish I havent wasted my time researching this dude.
I will gladly admit I am wrong if you can debate me and prove to me that this guy is for real. But....
For those of you who don't know, this is the story of Russell:
Short Version: Russell Jay Gould saved America from Deep state in 1999 because he created a legitimate US flag and a contract, and then tricked the vatican into accepting his contract. This stopped the london banking system from taking over the US. Otherwise it wouldve all been over in 1999.
Now that Russell is the official post master general, (he isnt) he holds the power to keep us from being enslaved.
The end.
Now theres some Russell believers who think that Trump is trying to build a wall to stop people from escaping the US. also, some who believe that Trump wants to take control of USPS , so that Russell loses his Post master general powers. Some are trump supporters as well.
Any Russell supporters that would like to defend their position?
**We need a decentralized Youtube. **LBRY is exactly that. Content creators can transfer their whole youtube library into their account easily with a few clicks.
Why TF did we choose Rumble as our savior? Not loving the UI Rumble is alright, I guess but it can be compromised. The future is decentralization.
Content creators were moving to LBRY because of the whole youtube purge, some time last year. 10 million users and counting....
I dont expect this post to start changing people on what they use. But the more people upload videos on to LBRY, and use LBRY video links, the closer we get to assurance that big tech will NOT own our online entertainment/news.
I dont even care if its LBRY specifically. as long as its decentralized.
if you wanna just use it through the browser, its https://odysee.com/
desktop application at https://lbry.com/
1384 days from now, it will be 11.4 (2024) not only does to lead to Q post 1384 which is a mindblower, and NOT ONLY is this day after election day in 2024, BUT 11.4 comes after 11.3 from the DoD Manual (Obviously). If you're up to date on info, you'd know that 11.3 is the first marker to look for. let me copy paste what section 11.4 says below This looks very much like it relates to the temporary military occupancy of DC.
11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power.
11.4.1 Right of the Occupying Power to Govern the Enemy Territory Temporarily. The right to govern the territory of the enemy during its military occupation is one of the incidents of war. By the fact of occupation (i.e., the Occupying Power’s established power over occupied territory),* the Occupying Power is conferred the authority to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty. The exercise of these sovereign rights also results from the necessity of maintaining law and order, indispensable both to the inhabitants and to the occupying force, and the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions, or the undesirability of allowing it to do so.
11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. Occupation is essentially provisional. Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State. In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it. Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf Pompeo Tweet: https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1352274074886680579
