That’s about $5 per anon. Think of the message that would send. Shame the f*ck out of them.

Let’s round up the names of all the companies that put communism ahead of capitalism here, so we all know who to not support.

Frens, our fight is not for the right wing, although they would love to claim us since we are an awesome group both in size and principle.

Our fight is for our inalienable rights. These rights were not granted to us by a government. These rights are God-given, and every battle we fight, large or small, is for these rights.

Who are you and what do you stand for? When you're on your deathbed will you cry looking back at your cowardice, or will you revel in your constitution in the face of danger?

We are merely clay and water. But there is something else. A higher purpose. That instinct inside you to stand up is not just a survival instinct. It's anything but that. It's God however you define it, a sense of moral right and wrong for the common good that is worth sacrificing oneself for.

May you prevail. May you be victorious. May your sacrifices not be in vain, and know that you are not alone. God wins.

Why don't ants get COVID? Because they have anty-bodies.

But seriously, I have some questions about COVID antibody tests that I'm hoping a few of you big brains can assist me with:

For the sake of this argument, let's assume that COVID 19 is real, and unique from influenza.

Let's also assume we are trying to detect the presence of C-19 in an asymptomatic individual.

All info below are snippets/my quick take from pages at cdc.gov.

1. Since PCR tests are ineffective at differentiating between C-19 and influenza (low specificity), they are being discontinued after 12-31-21. They do have a high sensitivity, so they can tell you that you're sick, but not with what sickness.

2. Antigen test (nasal swab) produces unreliable results (low sensitivity) unless there is a high viral load, usually in the presence of symptoms, so basically confirms that a sick person has C-19 (high specificity and high sensitivity when symptoms are present) if they are already showing signs of being sick. This is generally considered a screening test and would need confirmation from another kind of test.

3. NAAT. Like the antigen test, this is a nasal swab test that looks at RNA but is has higher specificity. These are higher cost, usually take 1-3 days, and few are available. This seems to be considered the gold standard but many, including me, do not want the government all up in my RNA.

4. Antibody tests indicate if a person has currently or has had C-19. The knock on this test is that the body may not produce detectable levels of antibodies until the person has been sick and contagious for a while. This is done with a finger poke/drop of blood and results are same day. Although blood is collected, this is not a genetic test.

So, some questions: If an asymptomatic person wanted to know if they were infected with C-19, and assuming an NAAT test is undesirable/unavailable, then wouldn't the antibody test be the best way to determine current infection? Plus you get the bonus of knowing whether or not you have acquired or currently possess some degree of immunity.

Shouldn't antibody testing be the standard of testing?

Shouldn't antibody presence, whether naturally or synthetically acquired, be the thing that is required, if anything is to be required (mandated)? In other words, why look for proof of vax when they should be looking for proof of antibodies? Especially since the antibodies produced by the vax eventually wane. Being vaxxed is no indication of immunity, as everyone on this board already knows.

I know some of your responses already: big pharma profits, big government control, and gaslighted public. But I am thinking that if anything is going to help us out of this mess it's going to come from recognition of natural immunity as being adequate, and using antibody tests as the standard of testing. There may be a lag in actual infection vs. symptoms expressing, but hasn't asymptomatic spread of C-19 been debunked? Someone tell me how the presence of antibodies shouldn't be the thing we are measuring.

Thanks in advance.

Frens! Help me prepare for Thanksgiving in CommieFornia. I'll be traveling there from a red state and am dreading seeing my outlaws.

1. Are you vaxxed yet? My reply : go fuck yourself.

2. Did you Vax your kids yet? My reply : eat a bag of dicks you commie scum.

3. Isn't Biden great? My reply : Great in the history of the Muppets, maybe.

Any suggested improvements would be appreciated.

Direct quote from Trump rally yesterday

I would like to extend a warm GAW welcome to the restaurant owner that I talked to tonight.

I have a best practice to share: if ordering takeout, don't "phone it in", actually go to the establishment, sit at the bar, and have a wee dram of scotch while you're entering your order.

That's what I did tonight, as usual, and I happened to have a long conversation with one half of the married couple who owns the restaurant (they also own four others, all successful) whom I hadn't seen in a few years. I asked her where she had been, and she said she was trying to ease into a retirement lifestyle. She stated that she is beginning to see some of her contemporaries in the obits, and that life is truly short. However, her husband is so hard working and dedicated that he will probably always keep at it. Guys, these are the type of bootstrap entrepreneurs (pardon my French) that have made this country great.

Anyhoo, we get to talking and all of the sudden she asks me if I know about the tribunals. My eyes widened. I assured I was familiar with the whole devolution theory and believed it to true, down to the my core of my heart (my brain cannot handle the alternative). Of course, I immediately refer her to this website which is my home away from home. She writes it down. greatawakening.win, got it.

She then asks me if I ever listen to Dave's X22 report, to which I nodded, and showed her on my phone that when I launch my podcast app it is the first one q'd up. She goes on to tell me that she listens every night, and proceeds to go on and on about others she listens to. I told her that the investment stuff on Dave's show is a bit of a stretch (I don't think we will go where he suggests we will go), but that his other content is a fairly good summary of what I read on GAW. I encourage her to check us out to get the full story.

So, fren, if you made it here tonight and are reading this post, welcome home. And thanks for comping my scotch. Unnecessary but very much appreciated. Keep the faith, join hands with the faithful. WWG1WGA