Everyone on X is covering the voter fraud in the Massie election. Just bounce over there and have a look around. It's practically every account, even Ron Paul is covering it.
If this is a part of the operation, and Massie is in on it to expose AIPAC and israel in our elections, it's working. If Trump is owned by the jews, we're fucked.
He knew what happened and allowed it.
However, when Trump came into office, things changed.
-Q posts repeatedly framed Mueller as not actually investigating Donald Trump, but instead secretly working within a broader plan.
-In this narrative, Mueller’s investigation was a cover operation; A way to gather evidence against political opponents (Clinton, Obama, etc.)
This idea shows up widely in summaries of Q posts: that Mueller and Trump were “working together to expose a global cabal.”
Early Q explanations explicitly claimed Mueller was appointed to investigate Democrats, not Trump. Therefore, that places Mueller firmly in the “white hat” or controlled/grey-hat camp aligned with the plan.
Mueller was given the choice; cooperate or die. He cooperated. Now, he's dead.
Good riddance.
When Chuck Norris heard that nothing could kill him, he tracked down Nothing and killed it first.
Death once tried to collect his soul... Chuck roundhouse-kicked the Grim Reaper so hard that Death filed for disability, took early retirement, and now spends eternity hiding under the covers whispering, "Please don't tell Chuck I'm still here."
Cheryl Mills is the black female attorney representing the Clintons during their depositions.
She's been with them a long time and she's as dirty as the Clinton's are.
She was the Deputy White House Counsel during President Bill Clinton’s administration, where she played a key role in his 1999 impeachment defense, and Counselor and Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from 2009 to 2013, managing the State Department’s $55 billion operations and advising on major foreign policy initiatives, including post-earthquake reconstruction in Haiti.
After leaving the State Department, she founded BlackIvy Group in 2015, a company focused on building businesses in Sub-Saharan Africa. She currently serves on the boards of BlackRock, Inc., iHeartMedia, and the Clinton Foundation. She needs to be deposed too. She's guilty of knowing about crimes against humanity.
Her entire resume reads like a crime novel.
The Clintons will be arrested. I'ts only a matter of time now. These depositions are timed coordinated and purposeful for the a softer normie impact of when it finally happens.
Ayn Rand’s essay “The Comprachicos” (published in 1970 in The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution, later retitled in some editions as part of Return of the Primitive) is a fierce critique of modern progressive education. Rand draws a powerful and disturbing metaphor from Victor Hugo’s novel The Man Who Laughs (also known as L’Homme qui rit).
The title refers to the “comprachicos” (Spanish for “child-buyers”), a 17th-century nomadic group described by Hugo who bought or acquired young children and deliberately deformed them through brutal physical methods (e.g., stunting growth, dislocating joints, mutilating faces with burns, bindings, or incisions). The goal was to create permanent “monsters,” freaks, dwarfs, or grotesques for entertainment—court jesters, circus attractions, or street performers. These children were mutilated early so the deformities became permanent and natural-looking, erasing any memory of the trauma. Rand quotes Hugo extensively to emphasize the cruelty: deformity was seen as more useful than death for political control and amusement, as a living, flesh-based “mask” could never be removed.
“Comprachicos of the Mind” Rand argues that contemporary educators (especially those influenced by progressive education theories dominant in the mid-20th century) are the modern equivalents—the “comprachicos of the mind.” They do not physically deform children but intellectually and psychologically cripple them in a subtler, more insidious way:
They operate openly and with societal approval (children are “delivered” to schools).
They use no knives or irons, yet achieve the same end: stunting the child’s cognitive and emotional development.
The result is a generation of intellectual “monsters”—adults who are helpless, irrational, emotionally stunted, unable to think independently, disconnected from reality, and prone to whim, conformity, and collectivism.
Key Criticisms of Progressive Education:
-Rand targets several specific practices and philosophies she sees as destructive:
-Rejection of structured, conceptual learning in favor of anti-conceptual, concrete-bound, or “look-say” methods (e.g., in reading instruction).
-Emphasis on socialization, group conformity (”the pack”), emotionalism, and anti-reason over individual rational thought.
-Suppression of the child’s independent mind, replacing it with whim-worship, relativism, and tribalism.
The process begins early and is inexplicit: children absorb anti-reason premises emotionally and subconsciously, leaving them unaware of their own mutilation (just as Hugo’s victims forgot the surgery).
She describes how this produces adults who are:
-Incapable of grasping objective reality.
-Dependent on others’ approval.
-Prone to irrationality, mysticism, or statism.
-Alienated from their own minds and values.
Broader Implications: The essay ties this educational malpractice to the cultural and political decline Rand saw in the 1960s–70s (student rebellions, anti-intellectualism, the New Left). She views it as a deliberate (or at least functionally equivalent) attack on the human mind, far worse than physical deformity because it destroys the faculty of reason itself—the tool of human survival and flourishing.In Rand’s view, true education should foster rational, conceptual thinking and independence, not conformity or emotional “adjustment.”
The comprachicos of the mind produce twisted souls who can be more easily controlled or manipulated by collectivist ideologies.This essay is one of Rand’s most passionate and emotionally charged pieces on education, blending literary analysis, epistemology, and moral outrage. It remains influential among Objectivists as a warning about the long-term damage of anti-rational teaching methods.
If Ayn Rand’s essay doesn’t describe the current state precisely, I’m not sure what does.
“There were educators. They took a man and turned him into a miscarriage; they took a face and made a muzzle. They stunted growth; they mangled features. This artificial production of teratological cases had its own rules. It was a whole science. Imagine an inverted orthopedics. Where God had put a straight glance, this art put a squint. Where God had put harmony, they put deformity. Where God had put perfection, they brought back a botched attempt. And, in the eyes of connoisseurs, it is the botched that was perfect …”
https://theamericanclassroom.substack.com/p/ayn-rands-the-comprachicos
