I don't know how good or persuasive this argument is. All I can say is that it did work for the one Leftist I tried it on.

After going back and forth with a Leftist family member who was losing their mind today about the RVW decision, ranting that she's "had her rights ripped away from her by the SCOTUS", I took this approach:

"Your rights weren't taken away. This was the Federal Government saying 'After looking at the Constitution, we realized we don't have the right to say that abortion is okay or not okay. So we have to hand this over to the States'. They didn't take any rights from you, they just came to the conclusion that there's no rationale for it to be a federal issue. Now this decision is made by your state representatives and those people are going to be much more responsive to your communications that a Federal rep or senator will be."

She completely calmed down. She's still not happy of course, idiots rarely are. But she calmed down and has at least a 3rd grader's understanding of the situation.

Your mileage may very. Maybe my approach isn't as clever as I think it is. But it did work in one instance at least.

We got some very good news today with the SCOTUS striking down the OSHA mandate. However, there's one mandate still remaining and that's the federal contractor mandate.

There are a LOT of businesses in this country that have a federal contract or two, and this one hits me personally as my wife works for a small medical device company that, you guessed it, has a couple of small federal contracts.

This mandate remains on hold due to a ruling by the 11th Circuit Federal court. It looks like we won't get a ruling until the end of April. More info can be found here: https://www.agc.org/news/2022/01/13/federal-contractor-vaccine-mandate-update

My extremely based wife was informed two weeks ago that it is now "company policy" to be vaccinated. My wife is a remote employee that hasn't been in their office in nearly two years. She submitted her exemption request last week and we're waiting to hear if she gets it.

Frens, if any of you are in the legal profession, I'd greatly appreciate any input or advice as to what kind of legal case she might have if she's fired. Especially given today's ruling and the lack of enforcement on the federal contractor mandate.

Many of you are familiar with the work of doctors Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt in regards to research on the effects of the Corona Virus "vaccines".

They recently published a paper, and a string of subsequent events has added credence to that paper.

The paper is posted here: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf

EX-Pfizer VP Mike Yeardon saw the paper and forwarded this video on the paper to Steve Kirsch, a man I know many of you are familiar with for his excellent writing on the covid "vaccine" subject. The video can be found here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/

Steve Kirsch subsequently wrote an article on the subject and reached out to an unnamed scientist for his comments on the study. The Kirsch article can be found here: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results/

I remember talking to my son early in the summer on one of our nightly walks with our dogs. I confided in him about my fear that the "vaccines" could be a mass population reduction scheme, and that I prayed to God that they weren't and were simply being used as a control mechanism by a tyrannical cabal. I know many of you have held the same fears. But at the time, we had far more limited data than we do now.

This is still not conclusive fact, but this study is another very large step towards a reality where five years from now, 30% of us are struggling to maintain the country's infrastructure while caring for the remaining vaccinated who aren't dead but who are unable to work due to serious health problems.

Frens, I am shook to my core tonight. It's one thing to cautiously speculate worst-case scenarios. It's another to see hard data supporting that worst-case scenario.

My wife, son and one of my two business partners are Purebloods. Almost everyone else in my life is vaccinated. Family, friends, colleagues. I wonder what kind of world we'll be living in 5 years from now.

Fight. Pray.

The wife was feeling under the weather with an upset stomach and while I don't normally shop at Walgreens, it's the closest drug store where I could pick up some Alka Seltzer.

While I was there picking up the stomach meds, a pre-recorded message plays over the store PA system:

"Ask our pharmacist about getting the Comirnaty COVID-19 shot from Pfizer to protect you and your family this winter."

This was followed by some blah blah blah tripe about staying healthy then the announcement finishes with:

"This message brought to you by Pfizer".

I was appalled as I have no doubt all of you would be. The store is actively advancing the Comirnaty bait-and-switch. This is to say nothing of running advertising for a drug company that grossed 32 billion in revenue last quarter by selling lies and death.

I took a breath to calm myself and walked over to the pharmacist window. She was a severe looking woman in her early 30's and was busy filling out paperwork. I politely asked "Excuse me, I heard over the loudspeaker something about Comirnaty. I know that vaccine has been approved by the FDA but my understanding was that it's not yet available here in the states."

She looked annoyed that I interrupted her and then responded "It doesn't say Comirnaty on the bottle but the formulation is identical."

I replied that while that's my understanding as well, but there's an enormous difference in that what you have on hand is covered only under the EUA from the FDA and consequently, people have no legal recourse if the vaccine injures them. People might get the impression that you have actual Comirnaty and wrongly believe that they're getting something fully approved and that they have the ability to take legal action of they're harmed.

Her eyes narrowed and she replied "Trust me, nobody is asking about that. They just want their shot so they don't get sick".

I responded "That may be true, but isn't that an element of informed consent? You have an ethical obligation to let people know that this is not Comirnaty and if they're injured or God forbid, killed by this vaccine, they have absolutely no legal recourse whatsoever."

She replied, "Look, I don't have any role in the advertisements we play in the store", at which point she started walking away to file the paperwork, then turned her head back to me and said "is there anything else I can help you with?".

I said no, I've learned everything I need to know about this place.

The positive in this wretched story is that two middle-aged women were listening to the conversation and asked me about it afterwards. They were shocked to learn that they have no legal recourse and doubly shocked to learn about VAERS and the number of confirmed deaths/injuries. I advised them that this is a small fraction of the true count.

Dan Bongino has a saying about arguing for the sake of the people listening in and it was very true in this circumstance. I'm disgusted by Walgreens, but perhaps two more people woke up yesterday.

(For geographic reference, I'm in Minneapolis Minnesota).