So you think Hakeem Jeffries and Barack Obama are just like George Wallace and Pitchfork Ben Tillman because they've all been Democrats? Really? The white South went from the most Democrat to most GOP region of the country. You ignore that and just see a linear path from Jefferson Davis to Nancy Pelosi, whose family weren't even here during the Civil War?
Yours are liberal talking points in Republican clothing.
The South has always been the most conservative region in the country. And white Southerners were those Democrats. Their descendants are now the backbone of the Republican Party. We're literally to the point where we have dudes with thick Southern accents from rural Alabama calling the party of Barack Obama the party of Jim Crow. It is pretty amusing.
A thing like segregation was designed to keep blacks away from whites. In part to prevent black on white crime like we see in the OP. Much the same can be said for some of the other stuff you mentioned. History is more complicated than liberal propaganda or the ignorance of MLK Republicans. This cuck shit is just cowardly whites afraid to stand up for their history ultimately. Anything to avoid getting called a racist.
Think what you want. You're the guy with 'KEK' in your nick. So kinda ironic you're accusing me of this kinda shit.
It's also a common ruse of cops to accuse their targets of being shills. So you're suspicious.
Militant accelerationists often admire the fighting spirit of jihadis. He obviously went too far though.
More from Taber. Though you should really read the book:
The outbreak of the insurgency is the first step-it is a body blow that in itself inflicts severe damage on the prestige of the regime. The survival of the guerrilla force over a period of time, demonstrating the impotence of the army, continues the process.
As the guerrilla's support widens-and this will come automatically as the weakness of the government is revealed-political trouble is sure to follow, in the form of petitions, demonstrations, strikes. These in their turn will be followed by more serious developments-sabotage, terror, spreading insurrection.
In such circumstances, it will be a remarkable government that will not be driven to stern repressive measures-curfews, the suspension of civil liberties, a ban on popular assembly, illegal acts that can only deepen the popular opposition, creating a vicious circle of rebellion and repression until the economy is undermined, the social fabric torn beyond redemption, and the regime tottering on the verge of collapse.
In the end, it will be a question whether the government falls before the military is destroyed in the field, or whether the destruction of the military brings about the final deposition of the political regime. The two processes are complementary. Social and political dissolution bleeds the military, and the protracted and futile campaign in the field contributes to the process of social and political dissolution, creating what I have elsewhere called "the climate of collapse."
This is the grand strategic objective of the guerrilla: to create the "climate of collapse." It may be taken as the key to everything he does.
Here Rita, I know you love me.
"In the circumstances, it is obvious what the guerrilla's tactics must be: Politically, he must seek to aggravate such social and political dissension as exists and to raise the level of political consciousness and of revolutionary will among the people." - Robert Taber, The War of the Flea
'Terrorists' don't come out of nowhere and are often a product of legitimate grievances. Gaddafi's real sin here is he didn't bend the knee to international capital and submit to being saddled by the Western establishment. Getting rid of governments like his helps our own oppressive rulers monopolize power against us ultimately.
Libya's support for the IRA was tit for tat. The British state, being a US lapdog, hated any government with an independent minded foreign policy or a national minded domestic policy. Which is to say this was essentially in response to British hostility over nationalization of British oil holdings and support for Israel and compliant Arab governments. Not to say I particularly favor the cause here but I do understand it and Western governments suck, even if Western peoples don't. Indeed, Western governments don't even care about their own people. In this case more Zionist Jews and oil companies.
Agreed. The Colonel, for his many faults, was a source of independent action on the world stage. Helped Farrakhan, the IRA, even British white nationalists.
The US is about removing all opposition to the New World Order. His is a warning to never believe anything they say. And never give up your WMD program for some crumbs like he did.
/u/FromSaltWeCome - not seeing that book anywhere. Including in out of stock listings on used book sites. Apparently it was sold exclusively by Suarez's operation. Looks like it was mostly compiled from posts on Suarez's Warrior Talk forum which is linked to from here:
http://westernrifleshooters.blogspot.com/2011/01/book-review-guerrilla-sniper-guerrilla.html?m=1
Along with maybe looking through the old posts it is possible you may be able to approach Suarez directly about the book at his forum.
Hope that helps.
Also, as mentioned in an earlier post intended for you I am now banned from TheDonald. I am unable to communicate directly with you over there on this handle.
He pretty much can't. For that matter have you ever seen a Kennedy you liked?
You can show your appreciation by pirating it like I did if you want.
https://lib-vqqasckfrjorwc27tm3on7dg.1lib.ch/book/24970206/807ddd
The Mexicans would have a rather more negative view of our influence on them. We took half their country and our guns fuel their cartel war. As Porfirio Diaz, then dictator, said long ago: "Poor Mexico. So far from God. So close to the United States."
But given that their population was about the most anti-Trump during his presidency of any on earth they should be viewed as an enemy people. Well, that and they invaded us. That is a sore spot.
St. Patrick's Day doesn't irk me nearly as much. But the Irish in America were also essentially an invasive force. They took over Boston and then Mayor Curley vented his spleen against the WASPs. We should be glad moving Irish Catholics into Puritan country didn't create another Northern Ireland.
If we didn't we certainly should have.
Archive in case you get paywalled:
They're not going to let up on the anti-white stuff. Not one bit. This is great. The backlash is going to be for the ages!
Another funny is to wear orange on St. Patrick's Day.
Archive in case you get paywalled:
He also apparently attacked Omar's congressional office among other things.
Not all heroes wear capes.
It's a really close call. The Russians lie as much as the US government does - and one of them is telling the truth here. I hate the US government more and it makes sense they'd do this - so I'll side with the Russian liars here I guess.
I'll be pirating it here in about 30 minutes.
https://lib-vqqasckfrjorwc27tm3on7dg.1lib.ch/book/24970206/807ddd
Toobin's new book looks interesting actually - if of course adversarial.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Homegrown.html?id=5R6UEAAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description
It's not a 'bridge to extremism' unless I can post there freely. Maybe I'll check it out.