**Who controls the narrative?

The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital.

It must be controlled.**

I've been lurking around plenty, and have come to some sort of idea or otherwise on the 'truth' as it might be.

Personally, I'm now of the opinion that the truth putting 99% of people in hospital would be a fundamentally good thing for good reasons.

The idea of, if there's something wrong with you, it's better to face the truth and face having to seek assistance, then the alternative of simply not knowing.

Whether it be the parasite pill, that fungus idea that's going about, or something as simple as diseases being suppressed, regardless of the result...

People are going to go straight to the hospital in a panic, many of which going even if they're aware of how bad the situation is/the danger of doing such.

That's almost certainly why it has to be phased out slowly, perhaps we won't ever become aware of it all at once, merely at the fringes until it's ready to be pushed into the light.

Seems like something's going on Tuesday, so here's my random thought-bubble on debt/related post-awakening.

Fractional reserve banking amongst other things is almost certainly going to go, or be massively reduced in the amount they can get away with. It messed up society before, and allowing it to continue will just do the same again.

I've seen some thoughts from folks on this site before, but the idea of outright removing the capacity to borrow and lend to me, personally, is at least ridiculous.

Will people be allowed to take advantage anywhere near as much as they used to - I think not.

Will the ability to lend be removed, or if not, the ability to profit from lending...

I think it's too much of a stretch.

People need money to purchase homes, and sure, prices will be lower without a housing bubble and infinite quantities of money, but sometimes folks are in a dire situation and need to borrow, after all sometimes savings just aren't enough.

Not to mention, some people no longer are able to, for example, borrow from their family/friends, due to tragedy or otherwise.

Would like to hear people's thought on it - Am I wrong on this or, is there a take I haven't considered yet?

Appreciate any responses really, thanks.

For most of my time here, I've been lurking without an account, watching The Great Awakening gradually take place.

I've seen more and more protests, stuff I would've thought impossible occur, and watched as my belief in Q rose.

However, I've mostly been thinking on the British Monarchy as of late, it's more or less been stuck in my head for a while.

I might be biased due to the standard monarchy-worship of the UK, though I thought it's something worth putting out there at least, but take it with a grain of salt.

Basically, it's that while most of the Royal Family are undoubtedly pedos or involved in such affairs, from what Trump has said and continues to say, perhaps Queen Elizabeth is in fact either already whitehat controlled or a whitehat, to begin with.

From what I've gathered, perhaps the Deepstate wanted the British Empire to have a completely messy, disastrous collapse that they would be able to take advantage of through war, banking and other methods.

Perhaps it is why she is beloved by so many people, from a sort of spiritual standpoint at least, sort of sensing the good in her...Or the actor.

That, or perhaps she divulged valuable information to the whitehats, or otherwise.

Needless to say I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts on this, once again take it with a grain of salt, as I admit I'm not the most educated on the subject.