1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Diseases are usually caused by poisons and pathogens like harmful bacteria. A healthy body, which has a functional immune system, is usually able to deal with poisons and pathogens, so you need to first be poisoned to the point where it compromises the immune system and overwhelms the body.

4
JustSayIt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everything you are allowed to see is a distraction from the real lies.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

This video is a chapter from "Murder By Injection", a book written in 1988, which documents exactly how things went down between scientists, the Democrats, the White House and the MSM.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gab is probably the best option currently.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

What people call "AIDS", is many common diseases, caused by many different kinds of poisoning and parasites. Long term symptoms in "AIDS" patients are caused by the highly poisonous "medication" which is given to them.

There has never been any evidence that "AIDS" is caused by a virus, or that it can be transmitted to another human. There is no HIV virus. There is no scientifically valid evidence of any virus existing at all.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. MMS is Sodium Chlorite + Citric Acid, which when mixed reacts and produces Chlorine Dioxide.

While you can use it just like that, it still contains Sodium Chlorite which is acidic and will need to be broken down by your body, which can also cause stomach issues. For most uses, you should instead extract the Chlorine Dioxide gas into water using this very simple method, and use that diluted Chlorine Dioxide solution.

4
JustSayIt 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology, and there is no evidence of any disease being caused by a virus.

There is no scientifically valid evidence to support Germ Theory, which was invented by Louis Pasteur while being funded by Rockefeller. Big Pharma really doesn't want anyone to know that.

I suspect Ebola may have been their previous attempt to create a "pandemic", but it was either just a trial run, or it failed for some reason.

4
JustSayIt 4 points ago +4 / -0

No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology, nor is there any evidence of one ever causing a disease.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

From what I understand, they have ensured it's just "religious" enough to be eligible for religious exemptions. Otherwise it wouldn't be granted the exception to administer controlled substances.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

If anyone needs a religious exception, the easiest way to get one is probably to join the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing.

Everyone from all cultures and religions is welcome, as this "Church" does not involve any religion.

It's purely a loophole to allow exception for the administration of Chlorine Dioxide, one of the most suppressed substances on the planet, which would otherwise be illegal to distribute in America since it would put Big Pharma out of business.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are no "virus" cells. No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

cancer is always present in our systems but our body can usually eat the cancerous cells before anything bad happens

The exact same thing goes for viruses.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have to think like a far-left reddit mod... They would have probably banned you just for any 1 of those 3 sentences.

Good.

Masks aren't just stupid and disgusting...

retarded.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I know now, you're missing one big piece of the puzzle here, which actually simplifies this theory of the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide works.

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

What Virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a contaminated cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process.

The debris is indistinguishable from known exosomes (necrotic cellular detritus), which are present without any virus, and observed by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed by Virologists.

There is never any control included, because the only times a sterilized control has been used in a study, it resulted in identical exosomes being observed without ever being contaminated with a virus. This was first proven by the inventor of this method of "isolation" himself.

The only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

If you take this into account, you can see how the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide treats disease (which is falsely attributed to a "virus"), is actually identical to how you describe it working for arthritis. Disease caused by toxins results in cell damage, and the Chlorine Dioxide helps break down the dead tissue to it can be eliminated from your body.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

"AIDS" is not a single disease, it's many different kinds of poisoning, and AZT is straight up poison which causes disease.

There is no HIV virus. There is no scientifically valid evidence of any virus existing at all.

I've researched all the Virology science related to the the claims made in this paper, understand the processes used, and can confirm that these doctors are completely correct about Germ Theory being entirely unproven. The "science" used by Virologists is very unscientific, and no virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

Since most people don't have the scientific background to easily be able to make sense of and evaluate the science itself, I recommend they instead try to find a single valid rebuttal against any of the claims made about the science.

Many people have asked about this all over the internet, and the only responses you will find are either total agreement, agreement with some ignorance and downplaying of certain things, references to completely fake news, or an attempt to discredit the Doctors with unrelated character assassination.

No one can argue with real science.

by robchaw
1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then how do you explain so many people having cured so many serious diseases with it?

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Action sports are just about the only physical sports which can keep me entertained. X-Trials is some really impressive shit.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same here, couldn't give a fuck about the wokelympics... Just lucky that I saw that posted in another .Win, and it's yet another "coincidence".

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is much much older than you think. It dates back to the dawn of Germ Theory and Virology. No one has ever isolated a virus in the history of virology.

What virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process. Identical dead cell debris is common organic matter which is observed in nature by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed. There is also never any control, because the only times a sterilized control has been included in a study, it resulted in identical debris particles without ever being contaminated with a virus.

There only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›