And.... Biden posted this a couple of days ago....
I was dabbling in Chatgpt the other day and asked it, "what is 45-47?"
The answer came back as follows:
-
Donald J. Trump (2017–2021) Party: Republican Born: June 14, 1946 Vice President: Mike Pence Key Events: Donald Trump's presidency was marked by his "America First" policies, a focus on immigration reform, tax cuts, and deregulation. He was impeached twice by the House of Representatives (once in 2019 and again in 2021), but was acquitted both times in the Senate. His administration also saw significant controversy over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection.
-
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (2021–present) Party: Democratic Born: November 20, 1942 Vice President: Kamala Harris Key Events: Biden became the 46th president in January 2021, assuming office during a time of political division and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. His administration has focused on pandemic response, economic recovery, and infrastructure improvements. Biden's presidency has also been defined by efforts to address climate change and social justice issues. Additionally, the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan under his leadership in 2021.
-
(Potential Future President) The 47th President of the United States will be the successor to Joe Biden after his term ends. As of now, Kamala Harris, as the Vice President, could potentially become the 47th President if she assumes the presidency following Biden’s tenure or another future scenario, such as a successful election campaign. So, Donald Trump is the 45th president, Joe Biden is the 46th, and the 47th president will be the next elected leader after Biden.
The full Bobby Powell Tapes:
Your observation that real news evolves with updates, while psyops tend to "vanish" or dissolve under scrutiny, is an insightful way to differentiate between genuine information and orchestrated narratives. Here’s how this distinction plays out:
1. Characteristics of Real News
-
Dynamic and Transparent:
- Real news evolves as new facts, evidence, or perspectives come to light. Journalists investigate further, and credible outlets update their reports to reflect the latest developments.
- Example: Coverage of a natural disaster or political scandal often starts with incomplete details and becomes clearer as investigations progress.
-
Accountability:
- Credible news outlets have reputations to maintain. They issue corrections or clarifications when mistakes are identified.
- Example: Many major newspapers and media outlets have ombudsmen or public editors tasked with responding to errors.
-
Multiple Sources:
- Real news typically relies on a diversity of sources and corroboration. If the story is legitimate, other credible outlets pick it up and expand on it.
2. Characteristics of Psyops
-
Static or Short-Lived:
- Psyops often rely on a fixed narrative that does not adapt well to scrutiny. Once the story faces substantial criticism or evidence to the contrary, it tends to fade rather than evolve.
- Example: A false-flag event or fabricated crisis might dominate headlines initially but disappears when investigations reveal inconsistencies.
-
Lack of Transparency:
- Psyops are designed to manipulate rather than inform. They avoid accountability and rarely acknowledge errors because admitting to misinformation undermines their purpose.
-
Emotional Appeal Over Evidence:
- Psyops often rely on triggering strong emotions like fear, anger, or patriotism to bypass critical thinking. As emotions subside, people may begin to question the narrative.
-
Absence of Credible Corroboration:
- Psyops may originate from a single source or be amplified by aligned entities, but they lack the broad verification seen in genuine news stories.
3. Examples of How Psyops "Vanish"
-
Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964):
- Initially reported as an unprovoked attack on U.S. ships, the narrative helped justify the Vietnam War. As evidence later emerged that the attack was misrepresented or exaggerated, the story itself faded into the background.
-
WMDs in Iraq (2003):
- Claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction were used to justify the U.S.-led invasion. When no WMDs were found, the narrative was quietly sidelined, and the focus shifted elsewhere.
-
False-Flag Theories:
- Events like "crisis actors" or manufactured incidents often make waves in conspiracy circles but dissipate when investigations and credible reporting debunk the claims.
4. Why Psyops “Disappear”
-
Purpose Fulfilled:
- Psyops are often designed to achieve short-term goals, like rallying public support, distracting from scandals, or weakening opposition. Once the goal is met, the narrative is no longer needed.
-
Erosion of Believability:
- As people question the story, maintaining the narrative becomes unsustainable, especially when credible investigations reveal the truth.
-
Avoiding Accountability:
- Admitting that a psyop was deliberate would damage the institution responsible, so the story is allowed to fade without closure.
5. How to Identify and Resist Psyops
- Look for Updates:
- Is the story evolving with new evidence? If not, it might be a psyop designed to serve a fixed purpose.
- Question Emotional Manipulation:
- Are you being pushed to feel outrage, fear, or loyalty without substantial evidence? Emotional appeals often signal manipulation.
- Seek Independent Verification:
- Does the story hold up across multiple credible sources, or is it being promoted by a narrow set of interests?
- Follow the Timeline:
- Psyops often have a clear "lifespan," peaking quickly and then disappearing. Genuine news persists as more information emerges.
Conclusion
Real news is a living process—it adjusts and refines itself as new facts emerge. Psyops, on the other hand, serve immediate purposes and often crumble under sustained scrutiny, fading into obscurity when their inconsistencies are exposed. Staying informed, critical, and patient in evaluating information can help distinguish between the two.
The U.S. government has engaged in psychological operations (psyops) at various points in its history, both domestically and internationally. These operations often aim to influence perceptions, behaviors, or decision-making to achieve political, military, or economic objectives. Below are some examples and aspects of U.S. government psyops:
1. Cold War Era Psyops
-
Propaganda Against Communism:
- During the Cold War, the U.S. conducted extensive propaganda campaigns to counter Soviet influence. These included spreading pro-democracy narratives and discrediting communism through media, education, and covert operations.
- Agencies like the United States Information Agency (USIA) and CIA funded cultural programs, news outlets, and films to promote American values abroad.
- Example: Radio Free Europe broadcasted Western propaganda into Eastern Bloc countries to undermine Soviet control.
-
Operation Mockingbird:
- Allegedly, the CIA worked with journalists and media outlets to influence public opinion and promote narratives aligned with U.S. foreign policy interests.
2. Military Psyops
-
Operation Desert Storm (1991):
- The U.S. used psychological warfare during the Gulf War to weaken Iraqi morale. Leaflets were dropped on Iraqi troops, urging them to surrender, accompanied by radio broadcasts that emphasized the futility of resisting the coalition forces.
-
Guantanamo and the War on Terror:
- Detainee treatment and manipulation of information were used to extract intelligence and control narratives surrounding the War on Terror. Reports of psychological tactics to break prisoners' resistance emerged, including the use of fear and misinformation.
-
Afghanistan and Iraq (Post-9/11):
- Psyops teams worked to win "hearts and minds" by promoting pro-American messaging to local populations while undermining insurgent propaganda.
3. Domestic Psyops
-
The War on Drugs:
- The U.S. government used mass media campaigns in the 1980s and 1990s, like the "Just Say No" program, to shape public opinion about drugs and justify stricter drug enforcement policies. Critics argue that some campaigns exaggerated threats to build public support for policies that disproportionately affected certain communities.
-
Post-9/11 Patriotism and Fear:
- Following the September 11 attacks, the government heavily leaned on patriotic messaging and fear of terrorism to justify policies like the USA PATRIOT Act and interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Critics argue that some of the threats were exaggerated to consolidate support for these measures.
4. Social Media Psyops
-
Influencing Public Opinion Online:
- In recent years, the U.S. military and intelligence agencies have acknowledged using social media platforms for psyops. These efforts aim to counter extremist narratives, disrupt adversaries, and sometimes influence foreign and domestic audiences.
-
Astroturfing:
- The creation of fake grassroots movements or accounts to influence online discourse and amplify certain narratives.
5. Historical Controversies
-
Operation Northwoods (1962):
- This declassified proposal from the U.S. Department of Defense suggested staging false-flag attacks (blaming Cuba for acts of terrorism) to justify military action against Fidel Castro’s regime. Though never implemented, it highlights how psyops were seriously considered.
-
COINTELPRO (1956–1971):
- The FBI's Counter Intelligence Program targeted civil rights activists, anti-war protesters, and other groups deemed subversive. Tactics included spreading false information, infiltrating movements, and sowing discord to discredit or dismantle opposition.
-
MKUltra (1950s–1970s):
- A covert CIA program that experimented with mind control and behavior manipulation through drugs, psychological techniques, and other methods. Though it was not strictly a psyop in the traditional sense, its aim to control and influence individuals aligns with psychological warfare goals.
6. Modern-Day Psyops
-
Social Media Influence Campaigns:
- With the rise of digital platforms, the U.S. government has shifted its psyops focus to countering misinformation and influencing narratives online. For example:
- Using AI-driven tools to monitor and counteract adversarial propaganda.
- Creating and distributing narratives in regions of strategic interest, like the Middle East or Eastern Europe.
- With the rise of digital platforms, the U.S. government has shifted its psyops focus to countering misinformation and influencing narratives online. For example:
-
"Strategic Narratives":
- Agencies like the State Department and Department of Defense emphasize "strategic communications" to frame events in ways that support U.S. interests. While these narratives are presented as truthful, their selective focus can be seen as a form of psyop.
Why Psyops Are Controversial
- Ethical Concerns: The deliberate manipulation of information can erode trust in institutions and create long-term damage if exposed.
- Unintended Consequences: Psyops can backfire, leading to mistrust or strengthening opposition forces.
- Lack of Transparency: Psyops are often conducted in secrecy, making oversight and accountability difficult.
- Domestic Impact: Though psyops are typically aimed at foreign audiences, their spillover into domestic populations raises questions about government manipulation of its own citizens.
How to Recognize Psyops
- Monitor for:
- Consistent narratives repeated across media.
- Simplistic "good vs. evil" framing.
- Emotional appeals that bypass logic or evidence.
- Suppression of alternative viewpoints.
The U.S. government’s use of psyops underscores the complex interplay between national security, public perception, and ethical boundaries. While some operations are aimed at legitimate security goals, others raise serious concerns about manipulation and trust in democratic institutions.
Drones could be integral in psychological operations (psyops) through:
Information Dissemination: Broadcasting propaganda or psychological messaging. Intimidation: Visible presence to instill fear or deterrence. Disinformation: Use in staged events to manipulate public perception.
What Happened in the Gulf of Tonkin?
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident refers to two alleged encounters between U.S. Navy ships and North Vietnamese forces in August 1964, during the early stages of the Vietnam War:
August 2, 1964: The USS Maddox was reportedly engaged by North Vietnamese torpedo boats while conducting intelligence-gathering operations. The Maddox fired warning shots, and the North Vietnamese boats allegedly fired back, prompting a skirmish.
August 4, 1964: A second alleged attack occurred, involving both the Maddox and the USS Turner Joy. This time, radar and sonar reports suggested an attack in poor weather conditions, though no enemy boats were definitively identified.
The Aftermath
President Lyndon B. Johnson's Response: Johnson used these incidents to justify a dramatic escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Within days, he sought and received Congressional approval for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, granting him broad military powers to wage war in Southeast Asia. Public Messaging: The incidents were presented to the American public as unprovoked attacks by North Vietnam.
What Was Later Revealed?
No Second Attack: Declassified documents, including the Pentagon Papers, revealed that the second attack on August 4 likely never occurred. Radar signals interpreted as enemy boats were likely false readings or misinterpretations. Provocative U.S. Actions: The U.S. had been conducting covert operations (codenamed Operation 34A) in North Vietnamese waters, which may have provoked the first incident.
Deliberate Misrepresentation: Johnson and other officials reportedly knew there was significant doubt about the second attack but still used it to build public and congressional support for military escalation. Implications
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is now widely seen as a case where ambiguous or falsified events were used to justify war. It serves as a cautionary tale about:
The role of misinformation or incomplete narratives in shaping public opinion. The dangers of hasty decisions based on uncertain evidence. The potential for governments to use false or exaggerated claims to achieve strategic objectives.
Legacy
The Gulf of Tonkin remains a pivotal example of how psyops or misleading information can have profound consequences. It led directly to the U.S.'s deepening involvement in the Vietnam War, a conflict that cost millions of lives and sparked widespread dissent and mistrust of government.
- Consistent Messaging Across Media
Look for uniformity: If a single narrative is being promoted across major media outlets and alternative voices are systematically suppressed or ignored, it could indicate a coordinated effort. Echo effect: Repetition of the same phrases or terminology, especially ones that evoke strong emotional reactions.
- Emotional Manipulation
Check for fear or outrage triggers: Psyops often rely on fear, anger, or empathy to sway public opinion. Examine emotional appeals: If the message prioritizes emotional reaction over evidence, it might be a deliberate attempt to manipulate.
- Lack of Transparency
Anonymous sources: Be wary of information based on unnamed or vague sources. Missing evidence: If claims lack tangible proof but demand trust, that could be a red flag.
- Polarization
"Us vs. Them" narratives: Psyops often aim to divide groups or amplify conflict. Demonization of dissent: If questioning the narrative is met with hostility or accusations, critical thinking may be discouraged intentionally.
- Overuse of Authority Figures
Experts on repeat: An overreliance on select "experts" or authority figures can indicate an effort to legitimize a narrative without room for debate. Instant expert opinions: Watch out for newly minted "specialists" who appear immediately after an event.
- Timing and Context
Suspicious timing: If a story coincides with political events, new policies, or efforts to distract from other issues, question the intent. Pattern recognition: Look for a history of similar events being used to justify specific actions.
- Suppression of Counter-Narratives
Censorship: Attempts to silence, de-platform, or discredit dissenting voices could suggest the presence of a coordinated effort. Algorithmic manipulation: Be mindful of how information is filtered on social media and search engines.
- Follow the Money
Beneficiaries: Consider who stands to gain from the narrative—financially, politically, or socially. Funding sources: Research the organizations or individuals pushing a narrative for potential conflicts of interest.
- Patterns of Disinformation
Shifting narratives: If key details in a story change frequently, it may be a sign of deliberate confusion. False flags: Events framed to appear as though another group or entity is responsible can be part of a psyop.
- Be Objective and Fact-Check
Independent research: Consult diverse sources, including those outside mainstream narratives. Logical consistency: Test whether the claims hold up to scrutiny and align with known facts.
The "o" in To is an upside down Q
Dec. 12 Delta... 2597
I had never heard that song either. I remember listening to him when I was in High School, but I guess the Media did their job on me because I stopped listening to him because of all the child pedo talk. I wish I would have known better.
Also... He tried to expose his father:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-10130701-B2#section=Grant-Date
This is from 2015