G'day Pedes and Patriots,
Seeing a lot of 60 day accounts with low post activity and low scores asking questions about "Is there a plan?", "I'm losing hope", "What if we're wrong?".
The accounts, their similar activity patterns, and that so many of these questions are popping up is making me wonder if this is this weeks version of "Is this real d00dz?" posts that happened about 10 days ago.
Check into the history of the person asking before biting heads off but if they smell like a shill, sound like a shill, and their account has the characteristics mentioned previously.. well, you know what to do. :)
Hi,
Normally I deplore mod discussion. However, what is the proper recourse for pursuing an issue that directly pertains to one?
A certain member of this board promoted a recent topic. I was one of, if not the only party who provided a counterargument to what is happening. This same party also pinned another post by another member within it which encouraged users to question if I might be a shill. Seemingly this thread was removed but also at the same time, my discussion with this particular party was specifically carved out of it.
That same member later posted an "apology" thread citing upon further consideration they are not so sold on the topic they promoted. They however failed to acknowledge my post, nor answer why they specifically attached this other members post and set the dogs on me, nor answer why they removed our conversation specifically from the previous thread when asked.
I pressed the issue further with another question calling this party to account. They almost immediately deleted their "apology" thread after this was posted. Coincidence, but a curious one.
Naturally, those who know my postings, know I'm pretty thorough. So I have receipts for all these things. Whom do I take this issue up with? This person set the dogs on me and have tried to dodge account at every step from where I stand. I want accountability.
If I get banned for asking these questions, so be it.
I'm in Australia, here the governing body which approves medicine and vaccines is Therapeutic Goods Association. Two vaccines are currently conditionally approved here, the AstraZenica and Pfizer ones. The product information for each (these are not consumer PI but applicant PI) tell some interesting tales...
Product Information for Comirnaty (Pfizer) https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-210125-pi.pdf
Section 4.6 is about pregnancy specifically, mentions determination for use in humans is based upon assessment of tests ran on lab rats. It is unknown if anything is excreted in human milk.
Public Assessment Report for Comirnaty (Pfizer) https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-210125.pdf
Page 14 - "Antibodies and T cells in monkeys declined quickly over 5 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (V9),18 raising concerns over long term immunity, which will be assessed by clinical studies according to the sponsor."
Page 19 - Is about Phase II / III trials which on the previous pages is mentioned as being the trial to assess its viability and safety on the larger population. Here are the list of excluded parties from the trials:
• Other medical or psychiatric conditions, including recent or active suicidal ideation/behaviour or laboratory abnormality that increased the risk of participation or, in the investigator’s judgment, made the participant inappropriate for the study.
• Immunocompromised individuals and individuals who received treatment with immunosuppressive therapy.
• Bleeding diathesis or condition associated with prolonged bleeding that would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate IM injection.
• Participants who had previous clinical or microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.
• History of severe adverse reaction associated with a vaccine and/or severe allergic reaction to any component of the study intervention.
• Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Page 28 - Although one of the least likely symptoms from receiving the vaccine, instances of Bell's Palsy has been reported.
Page 29 - "Pregnant women: at the time of the data cut-off (14 November 2020), a total of 23 participants had reported pregnancies in the safety database, including 9 participants who withdrew from the vaccination period of the study due to pregnancies. These participants continue to be followed for pregnancy outcomes. The data to support safety in pregnancy are inadequate at this stage." 23 - 9 = 14. Fourteen women trialed.
Page 34 - Risk management plan. Basically will tell you all the test data they haven't or can't provide at this stage.
Product Information for AstraZenica https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-210215-pi.pdf
Page 1 - "The vaccine is manufactured using material originally sourced from a human embryo (Human Embryonic Kidney cells: HEK293)" - Shit, right out the gate, eh?
Page 4 - They have no idea what it does long term to male and female fertility. Plus this...
"There are a limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women, or women who became pregnant after receiving the vaccine. The data are insufficient to inform on vaccine associated risk. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. As a precautionary measure, vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is not recommended during pregnancy. Use of COVID-19 VaccineAstraZeneca in pregnant women should be based on an assessment of whether the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risks."
There's a ton more within and here is the final document. I won't list more, people should pour over it. Feel free to point out anything wrong or anything missed. I am human and am capable of mistakes although every care has been taken to ensure what I'm talking about seems to check out. That said, hold me to the same standard I hold others, scrutinize everything...
Oh, the final doc. Public Assessment for AstraZenica https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-210215.pdf
One last thing... Provisional approval for both vaccines is granted on the basis of the sponsor supplying TGA with new test data every 6 months. It also is approved because it has an Section 14 exemption from the 1989 Therapeutic Goods Act which is the standard that makes sure things are up to our standard. Based on what you see above, you see why.
EDIT: Here is the original source pages, so users can look further and know it isn't just obscure PDFs referenced.
https://www.tga.gov.au/auspar/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-comirnaty https://www.tga.gov.au/auspar/auspar-chadox1-s
“McEnany is one of the most dangerously intelligent individuals I’ve ever seen at a podium. I’m just glad she is on our side. We’d be screwed if she were a baddie. God bless her,” one person wrote on a major QAnon message board, according to Vice.
Congrats to whoever this was! I remember reading that quote here a day or two ago.
Well done, patriot! :D
I POSTED THIS ON TD.WIN / PATRIOTS.WIN TOO
G'day Pedes!
Some of you may remember that the day following election night, all the major networks pulled their streams from YouTube and scrubbed them from their sites. This happened right as people started posting snippits from these streams of the votes flipping.
Here's the links to the streams on YouTube, from my history on election night.
NBC - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwRA-dtub7Y
ABC - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwjhikkGjPU
FOX - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmrGeWxd87Y
Bunch of dirty shitters trying to keep the truth hidden! I'm just going to leave these magnet links here for no reason at all... I will update it when I have the FOX and ABC ones too.
NBC
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:430bdff18dafc1aaeb120535d38e75c1ec672459&dn=MSNBC-final.mp4&tr=http%3a%2f%2f93.158.213.92%3a1337%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f151.80.120.114%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f151.80.120.112%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f31.131.4.62%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f194.182.165.153%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f208.83.20.20%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f184.105.151.164%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f176.113.71.60%3a6961%2fannounce&tr=http%3a%2f%2f118.24.123.223%3a8080%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f5.206.38.65%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f5.226.148.20%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f185.181.60.67%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f91.216.110.52%3a451%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f37.235.174.46%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f185.101.139.33%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f51.15.40.114%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f212.47.227.58%3a6969%2fannounce
CNN
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:9ab9deeff9d498926cccf4caa014357fef9a4c53&dn=CNN-ElectionNight2020.mp4&tr=http%3a%2f%2f93.158.213.92%3a1337%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f151.80.120.114%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f151.80.120.112%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f31.131.4.62%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f194.182.165.153%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f208.83.20.20%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f184.105.151.164%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f176.113.71.60%3a6961%2fannounce&tr=http%3a%2f%2f118.24.123.223%3a8080%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f5.206.38.65%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f5.226.148.20%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f185.181.60.67%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f91.216.110.52%3a451%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f37.235.174.46%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f185.101.139.33%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f51.15.40.114%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2f212.47.227.58%3a6969%2fannounce