Stop learning which sites to trust and start learning how to determine whether information is reliable or not. Critical thinking has been hijacked as a term to mean "disagreeing with the mainstream", but it's more involved than that. When you see a video like this, consider the source, then the context, then look at the video itself, question it all. Why is it being posted? Who is posting it? Are they reporting the news or just trying to get an emotional response out of you? Does the video show what it's meant to show? Is it possible it's fake?

Hello! Thanks for the comment, I appreciate it. My concern isn't about the method of ingestion or the fact that it isn't immediately dangerous, it's that someone died from COVID after taking it when it's supposedly meant to be a cure.

Hi, thanks for commenting and I'll take everything you've said on board and think about it. Can you tell my why you consider this fake news? It has been reported across many different news sources not just MSM. The posts about Ivermectin came from his personal Facebook account.

Isn't it disrespectful to a recently deceased officer of the law to imply his death was some sort of misdirection attempt and he is just a pawn in it? I'm trying to learn what your angle is.

Is there any reason people are upvoting this? All you seem to have done is said "it probably didn't happen" but you didn't say why you think that, same with the claim that the story is incomplete. What wasn't said? Why is this worthy of upvoting? I'm new so maybe I've missed something obvious, sorry if that's the case.

Wrong Wayne County. Brian is Michigan, Joe was Georgia.

What do you mean? One of 'theirs'? He very clearly existed and was a real person.

There's almost no doubt that the guy existed before this story and he died of COVID. The posts came from his personal account, I don't think saying it didn't happen is an option here. Is it not possible that it DID happen?