18
29

I believe that all these FF "shooters" were under mind control.

I believe that CIA/DARPA "designer drugs" were likely used, along with other mind manipulation techniques, to get these people to commit specific acts -- for which, most likely, they didn't fully realize what they were doing.

This neruobiology expert tells the students that these designer drugs can make people do anything.

Dr. Morgan shows how DREADDS can be “infused” into human DNA to control our behavior. These designer receptors, activated exclusively by designer drugs, can create new cells. They can create new memories and behaviors in their subjects. They can also use them to erase or even change your memory. CRISPR technology can be used to kill only certain races of people via DNA editing.

Dr. Morgan tells students at Modern War University in West Point that “the technology called CRISPR makes a number of things readily available … You can design anything. You can design one thing that would kill just one. When you make plasmids and put them into cells, it sends out a signal and tells which part of the DNA to uncoil, unfold and produce a product. That’s the future of medicine.”

Dr. Morgan asks, “What could you do with this technology if you were in security and intelligence?” The cells “can be designed for specific activities and purposes. They can be strategically placed. They can be remotely controlled. So these cell controls “can activate things in other people’s brains.”

In 2011, cellular-level technology seemed to control “the programmed delivery of information on demand.” By 2018, the power to replace one’s own memories and decisions with the surrogate reality of controllers via blood, brain and cells had already passed any behavioral conditioning via cell phones.

Dr. Morgan is very explicit in his slide presentation, “Cells can be designed for specific activities and purposes. Cells can be strategically placed. They can be controlled remotely.” The new technology allows his controllers to activate things in other people’s brains.

Could fake vaccines be the tool used to inject these drugs into "test subject" who are then used for FF purposes?

https://greatreject.org/rna-vaccines-control-the-human-brain/

Is this story true or made up?

I don't know, but the concept is likely close to what happens with these FF events.

I am skeptical that cells, specifically, can be controlled. But I also don't think that would be necessary if designer drugs were used.

And if drugs are injected to make it all happen, then that raises new issues with fake vaccines and mandatory injections.

45

After reading this thread by u/purkiss80 --

https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hv708yRU/alright-i-had-time-to-translate-/c/

It became obvious what is going on with these bioweapons labs. So, I wrote this post. Reposting here as a new thread for discussion to anyone interested:


Let's say my name is Dr. Evil, and I run a bioweapons lab in Ukraine.

I either (a) know that virues do not exist, or (b) don't know that viruses do not exist, but because they don't, I have never been able to create a weaponized virus.

So ...

I ask the Gates, Clinton, Soros and other criminal foundations for grant money to study viruses. They happily provide me with millions of dollars to study viruses.

However ...

Due to the "Dual Use Research" provisions, I can redirect that money away from viruses and into either biological weapons, chemical weapons, or creative drug concoctions that can be injected directly into people via drugs that are falsely labeled as "vaccines."

So, Americans pay taxes, and the money ends up in the hands of criminals like Fauci, who then launders the money into the various criminal foundations and criminal private equity firms (Joe/Hunter Biden, and various co-conpsirators like John Kerry), and the money comes into my foreign country (Ukraine), which (after a 50% skimming fee as kickbacks to both American and Ukrainian politicians) goes into my lab's bank account for virus research, which is redirected to other things which might actually be real.

Then ...

I come up with a formula let's say for an ingredient that can be mixed into a drug, which makes the metals in a human body activate with EMF's (5G) and do some nasty stuff.

I sell this formula to international drug makers, who sell the drugs to the government, who give it "for free" to the people -- claiming it is to help them, when in reality it was designed from the beginning to harm them.

These drug companies also pay patent fees back to Fauci, who claims to be the "inventor" since his government agency funded the initial research.

All of the nefarious research is done "off shore" and away from the Big Pharma companies. If someone wanted to try and track it all down, they would be met with a wall of separation by a foreign lab in a foreign country, that has NWO puppets who run the country's legal system, and there will be no investigation (just ask F. Joe Biden about investigations of wrongdoing in Ukraine).

Just spitballing here ...

And adding that this post by u/purkiss80 explains the labs were used to create aerosol sprays of pathogens.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hv708yJA/wow-you-guys-its-worse-than-i-th/c/

So, spray the skies or otherwise make people sick, thinking they have a "contageous virus" (meanwhile, the criminals are nowhere near where this is going on), and then come out with a harmful drug, falsely labeled a vaccine, to "protect" the people, but really to indoctrinate them into taking regular shots -- which will, sooner or later, but used for other purposes (the reserach for which was done in those same labs).

Logical thinking?

26

“I am writing today to apologize publicly for harm caused to anyone because of my inserting myself into the descriptions of life in Auschwitz,” Joseph Hirt, 86, wrote in a letter sent to his local paper, LNP, this week. “I was not a prisoner there ...

For years, Hirt gave public speeches about his experiences ... he also told people that he was arrested by the Nazis, sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz, and met Mengele ... claimed to have escaped under an electric fence at the camp.

He added an extraordinary prologue and epilogue to the story, saying that he saw Adolf Hitler turn his back on Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, and that he met Eleanor Roosevelt and Owens after his arrival in the United States.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/24/holocaust-survivor-lied-joseph-hirt-auschwitz

And he isn't the only one.

25

In under 2 minutes, Allan Savory explains what is wrong with the so-called "scientific community" today.

Same problem as the medical industry and the legal industry. They all go to school to learn misinformation, are indoctrinated to believe the misinformation as truth, and then come out adamant that they are the "experts" because they have been to an indoctrination camp and you have not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGDbpg1nG8Y

20

From a sunny day to a completely cloudy day in a matter of minutes.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/104/955/011/original/2341f16a151b3095.mp4

164

Interesting speech.

  • Nobody cries out when crimes happen against Palestinians, Syrians, Libyans, or even Ukrainians in eastern Ukraine being killed by their own government.

  • But "world leaders" (puppets) talk smack when Russia enters the picture to help those who are attacked by their own government.

  • And the US government is behind it.

Dude has balls.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/104/956/899/original/96c85597e85824f2.mp4

14
11

Are you a Nazi?

The following is a test. One point for every policy position with which you agree:

  1. Are you against teaching children as young as five years old about pan-sexualism, homosexuality, and transgenderism?
  2. Are you for the enforcement of border laws and the expulsion of illegal aliens?
  3. Are you opposed to outsourcing manufacturing to other countries?
  4. Should the government encourage domestic economic self-sufficiency (i.e., the production of anything needed stays within the confines of the country)?
  5. Do you believe that the people should have a direct say on government spending priorities such as infrastructure projects (e.g., roads, hospitals, communications towers)?
  6. Should the government embrace a balanced budget, predicated on a strong currency?
  7. Do you believe AntiFa terrorists should be prosecuted?
  8. Should the income tax be capped at 14% – without any games regarding ridiculous deductions - and only reserved for the wealthiest members of society (no income tax at all for everyone else)?
  9. Do you believe patriotism and civil manners should be taught in schools?
  10. Do you believe that social welfare benefits (e.g., food stamps, welfare, housing) should be tied to work and good moral behavior, to include when necessary, government provided jobs (e.g., cleaning the streets, washing ambulances, etc) and requiring drug and alcohol tests before receiving such benefits?
  11. Do you believe that the Government should privatize but regulate the vast majority of public services - such as electricity production, DMVs, etc?
  12. Do you believe anyone receiving social welfare benefits (e.g., food stamps) should be required to (A) take a sobriety/drug test before receiving them and (B) work in some capacity helping the locality (e.g., sweeping the streets) until they find gainful employment?
  13. Do you believe women should be encouraged to stay home and be mothers through incentives, such as lower taxes and assistance to young families that have more than two children?
  14. Do you believe social welfare benefits, such as food stamps, should be a helping hand, not a permanent fix, with time caps on assistance?
  15. Do you believe children should be taught to admire aesthetic beauty, physical strength, athleticism - and encouraged to participate in outside group activities as part of their education?
  16. Do you believe the goal of schools should be teaching the fundamentals of math, science, history, and civics, instead of social justice and subjective math (i.e., Common Core)?
  17. Do you believe marriage is between a man and a woman?
  18. Do you believe small businesses should have a greater say in local tax and spend policies of a community than big businesses?
  19. Do you believe patriotism is a virtue?
  20. Do you believe in a strong military?

Those are the actual policies of the National Socialist German Workers Party of 1932. If you got more than eleven (11) points, welcome to the party.

https://gab.com/PadraigMartin/posts/107831886533413286

11

I saw someone post about Miranda rights, and I thought I would disuss that, specifically.

[Note: For the TLDR crowd, you don't have to read this, but then you will be ignorant about it, like you are now. Some things have to be explained with more than 4 words.]

Miranda v. Arizona was a US Supreme Court case, which is much more important and relevant to what is going on today than most people realize. It could and should be used against the tyranny (only applies to the USA, but the principle behind it is universal).

Yet, not 1 in 10,000 attorneys would even think to use it properly. They are trained to be obedient to the system, just like medical doctors and cops are. They are not trained to think for themselves, and most don't. However, due to the nature of the personality types that are attracted to law, there are more of them than doctors or cops who actually do think for themselves.

Most people (including cops, attorneys, judges, politicians, and bureacrats -- i.e. government employees of all types, as well as fake news media) think that Miranda was all about the police giving a warning of rights to a suspect upon arrest.

That was not the important decision in the case. That was a suggestion, but not the actual holding of the case (meaning, the law that was determined by the highest court). It was more like a sidenote, not the main point.

Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnaping and raping a woman in Phoenix, Arizona in 1963. During police interrogation, he signed a confession. This confession was used in court against him, and he was convicted.

On appeal, he (his attorney) claimed that he did not know he did not have to talk to police at all, or that he could talk to an attorney, or that he did not have to sign a confession. If so, then he did not know his rights that are supposed to be protected by the US Constitution. The government claimed that everyone is supposed to know their rights, and it was not the police's duty to educate them.

Of course, such a position can lead to abuse by police (meaning, abuse by the government). The case went up to the SCOTUS.

There were actually several cases combined into one, which were all related to a suspect not knowing his rights. The others were accused of robbery, and their confessions and statements were used against them for conviction. They each claimed that they did not know that they did not have to say anything to the police, much less sign a confession.

The SCOTUS ruling (the important part) said:

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.

Do you see how this applies to vaxx mandates, mask mandates, and all the rest we are experiencing?

The court went on to state that if a police officer tells a suspect about his rights under the 5th and 6th Amendments to the US Constitution, then it will be presumed that the suspect did know those rights. Otherwise, it could be asserted by a suspect that he did not know them, and that could be a violation of those rights.

The court gave an example of how that might be done by police, such as, "You have a right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to speak to an attorney ..." etc. That is why all police departments have adopted some version of this.

But this "reading of rights" is NOT the most important part of the ruling.

The important part is that NO government agency (including Congress or a state legislature) can issue a policy or make a rule that would violate a person's rights.

Something I have not seen any attorney or non-attorney do is to state that the vaxx injectors did not read them their Miranda rights before they coerced an injection.

I don't know how that would be viewed, but if a person is supposed to KNOW their rights, and if this coercion is a way of violating their bodily autonomy (as secured by the 9th Amendment to the US Constitution), then all those injections should have first come with a Miranda warning, because there can be no policy or rulemaking which would violate the rights of the individual.

This idea is a "legal philosophy" question which has never been tested in court. But it should be.

Something to consider ...

P.S. Ernesto Miranda's conviction was overturned. The prosecutor tried him again, this time without the confession. He was found guilty again. He ended up spending about 5 or 6 years in prison, then was released on parole. Shortly thereafter, he got into a bar fight and was killed. Karma.

30

We are now seeing the criminal globalists attempting to pivot from "Covid will kill everybody" to "Covid will cause HIV, which will cause AIDS, which will kill everybody -- but it's definitly not the vaccines that caused any of this harm, so take your vaxx."

So, I wanted to create a thread of a post I wrote in another thread. This way, I can reference this thread in the future, and others here can debate this subject.

My initial research into HIV/AIDS led me to conclude that HIV was real, but it did not cause AIDS, because AIDS is nothing more than a made-up definition, and not a real physical syndrome.

Later, I discovered that people were saying HIV also is not real (does not exist).

Now, I have concluded that all viruses are made-up fantasies, because virologists ALL use a method to "study a virus" that is not valid.

We know that PCR is a technique, and is not something that can diagnose any illness. Likewise, nobody has ever actually seen a virus, captured a virus to study, or studied a virus. What they are looking at are cellular fragments of poisoned cells in a lab (not in a person), and everything else from there is pure speculation, not scientific at all.

Regarding HIV/AIDS, it is helpful to understand the history of how things have progressed over the past 50 years.

AIDS - Originally to Explain Gay Illnesses

AIDS does not exist as a real thing in the real world. Instead, it is just a definition, which is used to create fear in the public and money into the bank accounts of the fraud promoters.

In the 1970's, gay men in San Francisco were getting weird illnesses, some of them died. Michael Gottlieb (a Fauci co-conspirator) came up with the term GRID ("Gay-Related Immune Deficiency") as an explanation. There was NO scientific research to base this on. It was just a guess.

They tried to get grant money to "study" this thing (that did not really exist), but they came up empty because nobody wanted to spend money to help out the fags in San Fran.

So, they changed the name to AIDS ("Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome"). They claimed that anyone could get it (not just homosexuals). AGAIN, they had absolutely NO scientific evidence for this. It was just a made-up claim.

"HIV Causes AIDS" -- a Claim With No Science Behind It

Robert Gallo invented the "smoking gun." This is what changed everything. He claimed that he discovered that HIV was a virus that caused AIDS. The media went crazy with it, and the public panicked. Now, everybody could get a deadly illness just by having sex.

The money poured in, and Anthony Fauci was the ringleader for this scam.

At this point, they started doing HIV tests. And those tests were bogus. They could NOT diagnose anything. Kary Mullis spoke out against using the PCR technique as a diagnostic tool for HIV. But they continued doing it.

AIDS is nothing more than a definition. IF (a) you have one of 30+ illnesses listed by the CDC, AND (b) you test positive for HIV (with a bogus test), THEN you are diagnosed with AIDS.

If you have the illness but test negative, then you "just" have the illness, but not AIDS.

There is NO scientific research to prove this. NONE.

Robert Gallo would later state on the record that he NEVER had any proof. It was ONLY an hypothesis.

But the money rolled in.

So, what is the TRUTH?

The Truth About HIV/AIDS

The truth is those homos in San Francisco were part of the new "free love" movement that was sweeping the country in the 1960's/1970's. They were the gay subculture of it.

They created bath houses to have casual sex in. But their kind of sex is unnatural, so they used drugs to relax the anal muscles. They used Amyl Nitrate ("poppers") which turned out to be highly toxic to humans.

Plus, they were using recreational drugs to party for days at a time without going to sleep.

This "gay lifestyle" is what caused their bodies to build up with toxins, and they developed all sorts of nasty illnesses. Some of them died.

The Drugs Killed the AIDS Patients

Once the false "HIV causes AIDS" story became the narrative, they would test people for HIV. If they were positive (using a bogus test), and if they also had one of those 30+ illnesses listed by CDC, then they were diagnosed as having "AIDS."

They were then put onto "AIDS drugs" like AZT, which was a failed chemo drug. AZT is EXTREMELY toxic.

Cancer patients are given toxic drugs for a LIMITED time period to kill off cancer cells. But AIDS patients were put on these drugs FOREVER. These drugs killed them.

That's why they eventually stopped using these highly toxic drugs. It was too obvious what was really going on.

And once this was all figured out, AIDS just "went away."

There was a time when people were in fear of having sex. Now, nobody really even thinks about AIDS.

Until now ... because they have recently attempted to bring back the fear porn for HIV.

Just like Fauci led the fake scam of HIV/AIDS (and controlled the $$$$$), he has been leading the fake scam of SARS/Covid. Now that they have maxed out what they can to get everyone taking the fake Covid vaccines, they are pivoting to HIV, to scare more people into taking what will be the fake HIV vaccines.

They are pivoting to "Covid causes HIV, which causes AIDS, which causes serious illnesses -- because it's definitly not the fake vaccines that caused all those sudden illnesses, that did not exist before the fake vaccines were unleashed."

Get it?

Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR, explaining how he realized that there is no science behind the "HIV causes AIDS" scam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnFAvKJe9VE

"House of Numbers" is the best documentary I have ever seen about the history of HIV/AIDS, and why the "scientists" cannot answer very basic questions. It was done more than 10 years ago, before Covid, and you will see a lot of the Covid players in it:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/k7168G95ecNT/

The 2021 research that proves that NO viruses exist:

https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html

What [They] are Planning Next

They have recently changed the PCR "diagnostic" they are using. They have not done away with PCR; they are just changing the inputs. It is still not a diagnostic tool, but is being used as a diagnostic tool.

The plan is to make the claim that you just take one "test" and you get multiple results. You can be "diagnosed positive" for Covid, HIV, Herpes, and anything else they want to dream up. But no matter what, you WILL be postiive for something, even though you have no signs of sickness at all. Unless, of course, you are a good little lemming/slave and do not rock the boat.

This is to get the mRNA vaxx into your body. Injecting everyone at ALL COST is the goal.

Why?

There are no good reasons why, only bad reasons.

218

Went out to a bar last night -- something I don't do much anymore. I am the type that has no problem just walking up to people and talking, so I decided I would see what would happen if I started spitting red pills.

FUCKING AMAZING.

I talked about all sorts of things we talk about here, mostly Covid and all the fake news and lies we are told about it.

Had a group of people absolutely CAPTIVATED by the info I was giving them.

We tend to think that the normies are stupid, clueless, and don't care. Many of them are that. But many others are STARVING for TRUTH, and they don't have the time or know where to go to get it. But they KNOW that something ain't right, and they are not getting the truth from their normal sources of information.

We all probably have experienced friends, family, and co-workers dismissing things we say, and calling us "conspiracy theorists," etc. But when you talk to strangers, they have no pre-conceived notions about their conversation with you, and it is actually easier to have an open and honest conversation with them.

We NEED to do this. We NEED to TALK TO PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE -- not just online all the time.

Face to face (with no face masks).

These people were so riveted on things I was saying, and asking me so many questions, I just couldn't get to every point I wanted to. Spent a couple hours with a crowd around, all getting information they had NEVER heard before -- and they were FASCINATED.

There are a lot of lost souls out there, but I would bet that the vast majority of them are followers, and will follow whatever they think is the majority -- whether that is tyrants or patriots.

But there many more who WANT to know the TRUTH, and will act in an honorable way -- IF THEY ARE EXPOSED TO IT.

Most of them can sense something is not right, and many of them are already awakened to some extent. Some have heard the Joe Rogan stuff. Some have heard that car accidents are counted as Covid deaths. Some have heard about the Canadian truckers.

But they just haven't heard enough red pill info to be able to put it all together so that it makes sense.

I didn't get too deep into things -- mostly about Covid lies (cases, deaths, face masks are useless according to 50+ years of scientific research, PCR tests are bogus, there are no variants, Tony Fauci pushed the scam of AIDS the same way he has been pushing the scam of SARS).

The point is: We need to TALK to people, and let them know what we have learned, so that REAL CONVERSATIONS can take place. This is part of OUR mission in this Great Awakening.

16

Electro-magnetic changes around the globe (man-made) have coincided with massive outbreaks in health problems in the past 100 years.

Covid is no different. How much of this has been caused by the 5G radiation pointed down at the Earth?

Who is investigating it? Nobody?

How many sick people have a lot of metal in their bodies (teeth/dentistry ... previous vaccines ... metal plates from hip replacements or other surgeries)?

https://rumble.com/vtbkq0-5g-radiation-poisoning-is-causing-sickness-tom-cowan.html

106

I had a conversation with a woman today, who told me her friend is a dentist. He says that in 20 years as a dentist, he has never seen anything like it.

People's teeth are rotting and falling out. He has had to pull more teeth, both adults and children, than anytime in his career.

He says he believes it is due to the constant wearing of face masks.

138

Make it go viral.

https://t.me/GhostEzra/8560

31

They announced their earnings report after the market closed.

DOWN 23% in the aftermarket.

New low for the year.

They said they ain't gonna do so well going forward -- not gaining new sheeple.

Twitter also tanking a bit (8%) after the closing bell.

Good news: People losing interest in using Fakebook (and Twatter).

Bad news: Could have big negative impact on stock market.

For those following the market ...

28

I happened to get into a conversation with a manager at a Home Depot store. Manager seemed like a sheep, but I danced around certain topics.

Some of you might already know this. I suspected it, but could not get any hard evidence. Until now.

Employees at Home Depot must take regular "Covid tests" (which around here, we all know are bullshit).

They must submit these fake test results to the company. If they do not, then THEY DO NOT GET THEIR PAYCHECK.

ALL of these fake Covid tests are sent to Atlanta. There, somebody supposedly comes up with a result.

Any employee who tests "positive" for the fake Covid test, but does NOT show ANY symptoms (i.e. they are NOT sick), MUST take 5 days off work.

ME: "Interesting. Is that paid or unpaid?"

Mgr: "Paid."

So many businesses are complaining that they can't keep a full staff. Well, no fucking wonder -- these fake tests are resulting in fake positives, and the employees are getting free, paid vacations EVERY TIME they roll the dice and win.

445

There was a thread yesterday about Jim Cramer and Gamestop (GME) stock.

Although I disagreed with just about everyone in that thread, it did cause me to do a little digging.

I found this lecture by Patrick Byrne. He explains how Goldman Sachs creates FAKE shares of stock that do not exist, and this is how their company is so profitable.

The problem is, it has caused massive leverage in the system, and could be one of the reasons for a stock market crash (the money printing by the Federal Reserve is the other reason).

Goldman Sachs and the other prime brokers are THE SOURCE of ALL fake shares in the marketplace (and basically, all the fuckery in the marketplace).

The part where he explains HOW they create the fake shares is about 10 minutes of the presentation, and starts at about 3:00 (then, he goes on to talk about how to solve the problem with blockchain):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COQvMsbb-Cw

  • Almost 100% of the profits of Goldman Sachs comes from their "Securities Lending" operation
  • That operation is focused mostly on "hard to borrow shares"
  • They identify stocks that people want to short, then they lend those shares out
  • They do NOT have to actually own the stock when they lend it out
  • This allows GS to lend out shares that do not exist
  • Since they are also a prime broker, most of this lending is necessarily to hedge funds, which are the investors who are shorting stock that does not exist

Goldman Sachs and the other 5 prime brokers are the SOURCE of all the fake shares out there.

This is EXACTLY the same as the "money changers" from centuries ago, when they created more money certificates than were actually backed by gold on deposit. Same exact scam, just with stock instead of gold.

It is always good to know the names of the criminals to prosecute. Now, it's just a matter of finding the prosecutors and getting them into office.

14

He is finally getting a full presentation together to present his position, so that anyone can understand this issue.

This is THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE of our time.

Check it out.

https://rumble.com/vrsqfr-proof-covid-is-fake-at-red-pill-expo-2021-dr.-andrew-kaufman-m.d..html

EDIT: I just realized this video cuts off early. Anybody have a link to the full presentation?

21
92
29

Would this be wrong?

I like talking to random people. I can spout a lot of info at them, if they are receptive.

If nothing else, some of these people need a little nudge.

I have been bringing up these issues to people I have met, but not by me approaching and saying things like this. I have been surprised at how many agree with me, even though most of them really don't have any facts. They just see that something ain't right.

58

This is the most detailed lecture I have seen on the history of vaccines. Non-stop data and info for 1.5 hours.

Lots of graphs and statistics to back up the idea that vaccines have never been proven effective or safe.

Raymond Obomsawin still accepts Germ Theory, more or less, so set that aside. His info on vaccines is second to none.

If there is anything you ever wanted to know about the history of vaccines, and why they are completely ineffective (and are in fact harmful), this is the one to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtN0PMJOOjM

37

The swabs they push up people's nose for "PCR test" (not a real test) are soaked in Ethylene Oxide.

Ethylene Oxide is a pesticide and sterilizing agent, which damages DNA and causes cancer.

https://t.me/realLouDobbs/214

124

From Wiki:

The International Criminal Court is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague, Netherlands. The ICC is the first and only permanent international court with jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression. It is intended to complement existing national judicial systems, and it may, therefore, exercise its jurisdiction only when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute criminals

Criminal charges filed:

In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.

Besides the four kingpins, twelve others were named, including the CEOs of the leading vaccine corporations and the health leaders held accountable for the United Kingdom.

  • Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  • Stephane Bancel, CEO of AstraZeneca
  • Pascal Soriot, CEO of Moderna
  • Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson
  • Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO
  • Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister
  • Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser
  • Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
  • Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
  • June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
  • Dr. Ravid Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
  • Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum

Dr. Ravid Shah, having worked for the Gates Foundation since 2001, was named a World Economic Forum “Young Global Leader” in 2007. He now presides over the Rockefeller Foundation, a group funding ID2020 along with the Gates Foundation.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/gates-fauci-and-daszak-charged-with-genocide-in-court-filing/article_76c6081c-61b8-11ec-ae59-7718e6d063ed.html

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›