I'm sick of the commercials compelling people to take the jab, but in my exasperation, I noted something very telling. When the ads compel us to take the jab, they are foregoing the laws that all other pharmaceutical companies must follow. They are not giving the possible side effects. in pondering this, I realized why. While they are absolutely compelling citizens to take an experimental non-FDA approved jab, they aren't naming any of the pharmaceutical companies. Still, they are promoting products--and all side effects should be listed.
I pray to God that this failure to list the side effects comes back to haunt those promoting the jab (pharmaceutical companies, Hollywood nobodies, etc.)
3-Year Delta, but do you see what I see....?
What I say a class action lawsuit?
When is it effective?
Who controls the narrative?
WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?
WHO deployed the algorithm?
WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?
SAME embed across multiple platforms.
Why?
Why is the timing relevant?
Where is @Snowden?
Why did ES leave G?
Why has NK out of the news cycle?
Define false flag?
What event(s) change the news cycle?
Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?
You have more than your know.
BOOM.
Q
So the news media has reported that Trump and Melania took the vaccine. First of all, I don't care. He helped to get it created. I wouldn't take it, but I'm sure he didn't do it blindly and without knowledge of the vaccine he'd have placed in him. However, these hysteria posts, these doubting posts, that everyone is making on the subject is a little infuriating. I read two articles. One cited some anonymous source inside the White House and the other cited other news media sources. People, this is no way to enter into a new era. We must read and look critically at what we're reading.
I knew this, but I rediscovered it last weekend when I replied to a post without doing due diligence. I didn't hide my ignorance. Admitting to it helps me to remember not to do it again. I apologized. And I love the fact that on this forum, for the most part, we are allowed to make mistakes and apologize are accepted.
But I do feel it is important to repeat. If something catches your attention, read it or watch it or as was my case of forgetfulness--fact check the source and actually find the original post if it is seemingly from a credible individual.
Truth is the weapon we have in the digital war. It isn't so much that we have to attack others. However, I love trolling liberals on Twitter just enough to feed them the truth and make them think. But I believe they are way past logic and critical thinking.
By the language used on this forum, I would suspect that there are many in the community that do not believe in God. What I can't understand is why so many who say they trust in this plan, who trust that God is with Q and the Anons would invoke the name of God in posts and then follow it up with language that belies that fact. I know. I know. Freedom of censorship and and all, but with great power comes much responsibility. And before you shout at me and demean my comments, take a look at what you've written. Are you using the curse words for effect? In writing, we call that a shortcut to showing emotion. In life, we call it unprofessional. As Christians, we should call it ungodly. Now, take a look at what you've written again. Can it be said without the use of curse words? If so, why use them? If the sentiment isn't strong enough, can you capture the readers' attention in any other way? I think of each post as a "news article," and I bypass the "unprofessional, look-at-me" titles. And if you still want to pound on me, think of this: The words that come from out of our mouths, they come from our hearts. And those words will either justify us or condemn us (Matthew 12:36-37). What is coming out of our mouths now is a direct reflection of what's going on in America. We are upset, but if we have hope, shouldn't our hearts have better things to say?