I was looking at the Deltas for today from 2020 and it's one we've all heard before:
THE SWAMP RUNS DEEP. Sometimes you cannot tell people the truth. You must show them. Only then, at the precipice, will people find the will to change [to participate]. We, the People, have been betrayed for a very long time. WILL YOU STAND? FOR GOD AND COUNTRY. FOR FREEDOM. FOR HUMANITY. WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL !!! Q
The 'precipice' could be today's announcement.
Then another delta from that day:
Interesting change of events. Weekly [false] attacks + whistleblower(s) [false]. [1st [Vindman] coord [AS] [whistleblower] false narrative insert Ukraine [Biden deflect] returning to the news [legal]]? [AS] backroom prep [2nd whistleblower]? [AS] backroom prep [3rd whistleblower] _NATSEC? Pentagon [SR 1-4] backroom prep _dry run campaign [refusal]? USD(I)_JCS [2] Refusal to concede narr? Challenge legally battleground [4]. Ballot harvest [4] [illegally] [CA -1]. Everything at stake. Win by any means necessary. Plan accordingly [November]. Q
the "interesting change of events" part stands out to me, again, regarding todays annoucement. Also the ballot harvesting announcement was today or yesterday, if I recall. There is also another one about Newsome and CA, again relevant to recent times. I could be stretching as far as Mrs. Incredible on this, but at the very least I think we should start looking to drops and deltas again.
I'm sorry if this has been posted before, but I was wondering what everyone's thoughts on the lives lost in Kabul are in regards to POTUS being the true President (Trump). We know that IF Trump were still President, those lives would not be lost today. So if he IS the shadow President, how was he able to let that happen? I'm not dooming or shilling, I am just genuinely wondering about this.
We know that it's never been proven for sure that Trump is still POTUS, but to those who whole heartedly believe this theory, (I'm still unsure, btw) what are your thoughts on this?
This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
Ever since that post a few days ago of how to spot a shill, I've noticed the shills are getting smarter. A lot of them have seemed to have waited to lose the handshake and are cleverly agreeing (for the most part) with peoples posts, but adding in juuuuust a HINT of leftist bullshit. Enough to pass under the radar. Well I'm onto you shills. Mods keep up the good work, and pedes, keep your eyes peeled. Let's call these scumbags out wherever we see them. Also a lot of forum sliding, and really out there theories. Trying to throw us off the path because we're getting so on target.
It's really starting to piss me off. But keep at it, anons. Don't stop digging, researching, posting and theorizing. It just sure would be nice if we could do it with less glowie/shill distraction.
my thick skulled lib friend insists this is the same deal Trump made and the same results would have happened if Trump were in office. Any sauce I can point out to him that proves Joey changed the plan?
Am I wrong to be upset about this?
As we know dems aren't held accountable. Especially Clintons. So what was the real reason for Clinton being impeached? White hats in control even then? I somehow doubt that.
He's been acting very cryptic lately. I'm not sure if this is normal for him, as I haven't been keeping up with him for long. He seems to have been trying to take over the role of Q, and for me that seems odd. Something gives me the feeling that since Q was obviously the best thing to happen to 8chan, and since Q is no longer active there, he seems to have taken it upon himself to keep Q style research going to drive traffic to his site. The Watkins are extremely business minded after all. It seems to be their top priority.
Does anyone think this video will be "profitable" so to speak, for our movement? I know nothing about IT but if it's real, it seems to point to obvious fraud. But a lot of anons here are saying it's a nothing burger. What do you think?
I've been wondering lately, what the atmosphere around here was like pre and post 11/3. I didn't join until after the phony election, so I'm wondering in particular: was everyone 100% sure the storm was going to happen around the inauguration? What was everyones expectation of how the election would turn out? What was everyone's reaction when Biden was installed? Did everyone doom? And what eventually made everyone come around to believing the plan was still in effect? If I'm not mistaken I think I joined slightly before the inauguration, but I don't remember the general mood around here as I was too busy being blown away by Q proofs.
TIA
it said "Democrat cities" and had a one star rating and a review that said "Very bad. would not recommend" and I got so excited I gave him a thumbs up and he nodded and smiled at me. Great to see some young people who aren't braindead numb sculls.
He says they would kill us before we had the chance to shoot.
Can anyone give me some talking points to counter this?
Let's discuss... opinions?
I didn't personally, but it was hard with the feed cutting off every minute
And everyone was posting about on GAW. I've been having dreams about the Audit results and such too. I wonder if I'm just spending too much time on GAW or if they're prophetic.
Was just thinking that what if Biden's dog dying is a comm for Biden himself dying soon? They would give him a large honorable funeral and he'd go down in history as being a great President (to MSM and dumb fuck liberals), and Kamala would "legally" and "honorably" take the lead. That would be the DS plan. No 25th, no tomfoolery. Just plain old kickin' the bucket. Then maybe that would be a loophole to the fraud the audit finds. Kamala wasn't technically elected, therefore she cannot be ousted by the findings of fraud.
