Is it because their parents provide for them so well, they get used to depending on others and assume the whole world should be entirely run that way. I.e. the government provides you with all your needs?

They only run studies to see if the vaccines were effective against the virus. For pretty much all vaccines

RFK said this several times in various hearings. Is this accurate?

It really is madness then

But it also explains the emotional reaction to the topic.

One the one hand we are basically playing with fire since we don't fully understand the side effects and negative consequences. So this is pretty outrageous.

On the other hand, if they were studied and shown to be effective against their viruses. Then you can be a zealous believer that they are the perfect cure, ignoring all the unknowns.

Edit: I guess I am more concerned about the overall history of vaccines and childhood vaccines. Since a lot more people got these, and I have kids now. So me and my friends are all like "wtf do we do now?"

At this point I am still mad about Covid "vaccines" but it basically doesn't affect my life

I am 36, I was raised by Boomers and as a kid whenever you fucked up they would tell you to be responsible

But personal responsibility is a conservative value today. They generally want to be responsible for themselves and have the government do less for them and get it of the way.

So how did we get raised by people who seemed conservative but were actually leftists in the end?

This is just a chain of events that I predict.

Situation 1. If birth rates are far below replacement rates, we can see populations very quickly fall in a few centuries, in western countries.

This will mean that western countries will get outnumbered by non Western countries. Be vulnerable to war, possibly lose those wars and women's rights will be changed with it. High chance defeated nations become Muslim countries as a result.

Situation 2. Western countries "fix" their declining birth rate through immigration. Instead of producing people internally, outsource people produced externally. This would mean importing people from countries with less rights for women. This could easily change the politics of these countries to a direction which reduces women's rights, both through cultural change and voting. A majority of immigrants will probably be single men looking for work which makes me think it would tend to go that way. Remember think centuries from now

Situation 3 Western countries force fix their birth rate. The force of government is used to apply carrots or sticks to increase the birthrate. This could likely involve forcing people to have children, or else go to jail. This is very plausible to happen in China (a non Western country). This will be enacted as governments realize how vulnerable the country is becoming because of its low population. In such a case women's rights as we know them are changed significantly.

Situation 4. Western countries fix birth rate voluntarily. This could happen in a variety of ways, a new wave of feminism that emphasizes responsibility as a citizen which includes raising children. Political and economic chance that makes it more appealing to have kids. Social change which results in most men and women respecting each other again. Etc. This is the only one which can preserve women's rights / freedoms as we know the today.

This is just a prediction of possible futures. And just an observation that unless women in western countries can somehow solve this and create situation 4 (and I think women are the main deciders of how many kids a country has). Then one of the other situations is probably going to happen, and women's rights will be lost.

So, it kind of comes down to the responsibility of women. Women now have more freedom over their lives. But it has resulted in a major population decline. And I don't think that can continue indefinitely without one of these scenarios occuring which result in a change to women's rights or choosing to have more children.

WDYT?

Canadian egg prices are pretty normal. My family live in Ontario so we talk about the egg prices every week.

They must have not killed as many chickens in Canada.

So like wtf, why did we do it in the US? Canada borders the US so surely birds would fly between the country and spread the disease.

Seems like DOGE discovered some straight up theft by funneling money into "NGOs".

If this is straight up theft, can't they track down who in the government issued these payments originally? Or is that obfuscated?

Will we see arrests? Or is there some legal loophole they can hide behind? Kash Patel can investigate these crimes, right?

I know there were some bad cases of Bird Flu where some farm workers died. But has Bird Flu ever really spilled over and created some sort of fast spreading high fatality disease?

Also is it all just overblown like Covid 19 was. Why is there so much fear?

Is it really necessary to keep doing these chicken genocides every few years?

And can it even be stop if wild birds spread it and fly farm to farm? Why not just let it pass through get a herd immunity?