Wow! I had not seen Kash Patel in an interview before watching this. He covered so many things in a fairly short amount of time. I watched the interview on RSBN. I couldn't find a link to it; I watched it as a streaming channel via a Roku-type device. I don't know the date of the interview, but it was one of the ones that was listed when accessing RSBN, so I suspect it is very recent. It's rare to see someone who just lays out the facts, while also making sure he is clear when only offering his opinions. Based on this interview, Kash Patel would be poison to CNN and other leftist media, and is probably the reason he won't ever be on one of the Sunday morning "news" shows.

I haven't heard anything for months about this. Did it turn out to just be erroneous analysis by Lindell's experts? Or was it spot on, and he was told to quit talking about it by the people who can actually do something about it?

I've read posts on the site that state that Sagat was a pedophile. I don't think anyone of us knows for sure, but let's suppose he was. And not only that he was, but that certain people have such overwhelming evidence that if he were to go on trial, would either get life, or maybe the death penalty. What if these certain people believe such crimes shouldn't have to wait for legal punishment? What if they were "white hats" who believed it was proper, all things considered, to execute without trial? Have there been other suspected pedophiles who have also died under not-so-ordinary circumstances in the past year? If this were a pattern, it may mean this theory could be true. Thoughts? Or better yet, additional "sauce" for this theory :)

The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World Paperback – April 1, 2011 (originally published in early 1970's) by L. Fletcher Prouty (Author), Jesse Ventura (Foreword) 4.5 out of 5 stars 395 ratings

— “Offers uncommonly penetrating insight.…A rare glimpse into Covert and Black Operations.—New York Times Bestselling author, Governor Jesse Ventura, from his Foreword.

The Secret Team, L. Fletcher Prouty’s expose´ of the CIA’s brutal methods of maintaining national security during the Cold War, was first published in the 1970s. However, virtually all copies of the book disappeared upon distribution, having been purchased en masse by shady “private buyers.” Prouty’s topics include: President Kennedy tried to control the CIA. The nature of clandestine operations. The Dulles-Jackson-Correa Report in action Defense, containment, and anti-communism Khrushchev’s Challenge: the U-2 dilemma From the Bay of Pigs to Dallas. And much more!

Prouty’s allegations—such as how the U-2 Crisis of 1960 was fixed to sabotage Eisenhower–Khrushchev talk—cannot have pleased the CIA. The Secret Team appears once more with a new introduction by bestselling author, Governor Jesse Ventura.

“Like it or not, we now live in a new age of ‘One World.’ This is the age of global companies, of global communications and transport, of global food supply and finance and . . . just around the corner . . . global accommodation of political systems. In this sense, there are no home markets, no isolated markets and no markets outside the global network. It is time to face the fact that true national sovereignty no longer exists. We live in a world of big business, big lawyers, big bankers, even bigger moneymen and big politicians. It is the world of The Secret Team.”

Any "pedes" read this? I was just watching an old "To Tell The Truth" episode, from the early 70's, that had this author on. To think the CIA was that bad DECADES ago is pretty telling! It's interesting that the book was apparently bought up back in the 70's by some mysterious buyer to prevent widespread distribution.

I was watching the old "Password" show from the mid 1960's, and a word was "scandal", and one of the celebrities used "Baker" as the clue, and because it was on everyone's mind at the time, apparently, the play partner guessed "scandal" (after a few other clues didn't produce the word). I did a quick search for "baker scandal", and numerous hits for the Jim Bakker scandal came up. I re-entered the search as "'60s baker scandal", and this came up (from wikipedia; yes, it's sometimes unreliable, but is often a good way to quickly learn a lot of things)

x

Robert Gene Baker (November 12, 1928 – November 12, 2017) was an American political adviser to Lyndon B. Johnson, and an organizer for the Democratic Party. He became the Senate's Secretary to the Majority Leader. In 1963, he resigned during an investigation by the Democratic-controlled Senate into Baker's business and political activities. The investigation included allegations of bribery and arranging sexual favors in exchange for Congressional votes and government contracts. The Senate investigation looked into the financial activities of Baker and Lyndon Johnson during the 1950s. The investigation of Lyndon Johnson as part of the Baker investigation was later dropped after President Kennedy's assassination and Johnson's ascension to the presidency.

x

It's interesting to see that the investigation of Johnson regarding this scandal was dropped when he became President. Who wants to bet if it had been a Republican President they would have hounded that story into dust.

A New York City "Daily News" article about the Hillary-spying story included the following text: .x

. “This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” Trump said in the statement.

The next day, he added in an all-caps statement: “THEY SPIED ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!”

He has never publicly accepted that he lost the 2020 election to President Biden, instead sowing dangerous falsehoods about widespread voter fraud. . .x .

The idiots reading this will go, "He's claiming she spied on him when he wasn't even President!"

I had email exchanges with a classic "liberal" who I don't know personally, but had communicated with for several years prior to covid. Here is a recent exchange, which highlights what we are up against in regard to MSM brainwashing. .

Original email message from "Buddy" (not his real name :) ) sent to a large group I was part of: .

As I wrote earlier..."As we approach 9/11/2021, I have been struck by how the January, 2021 event has been "named" by its date, as were the September, 2001 events. Likewise, I can't help but wonder about the artistic/political challenge of imagining a physical marker for historical memory." It was not war; there were few killed. Yet, many think the event was a seminal moment for the United States and all that it stands for. .

I set up an informal competition, primarily aimed at college students. When it was over, two amazing, innovative entries emerged from the University of Texas - Austin.. The world could have cared less. Despite outreach to multiple political/cultural/design individuals on major national media giants, there was barely any response: Washington Post, New York Times, Boston Globe, The Guardian. Even major Texas outlets were not interested. .

Thought you might be...see attached. .

Hope you and yours are safe and well in these chaotic scary times, .

My response to Buddy: .

You really should look beyond how MSM and Democrats are trying to portray the January 6 event; there are many, many videos showing antifa-type people doing the breaking-in, and evidence the FBI was instigating it, at least some of it. Videos of Capital Police waving crowds through. Etc., etc. A lot of stupid people entered the Capital (although I'm not sure if someone goes through an open door of a public building, even if it was opened by someone else illegally, if that person can be charged with "trespassing", or whatever people are being charged with), but videos show them calmly walking between velvet ropes, taking selfies, etc.; hardly an "insurrection"! The "January 6 Committee" is a joke. .

Your thoughts? .

Buddy's Response: I respectfully disagree. .

My follow-up email: .

I guess what I really want to know is, are your views on the January 6 event, and on covid-19, based on what MSM tells you, or have you looked into a variety of information sources to come to your conclusions? (I am trying to figure out how leftist minds work. Since you seem somewhat reasonable (most leftists just run to avoid any discussion, name call and then run, or regurgitate MSM talking points) compared to most leftists. .

His response to this: .

Jan. 6 - the video is not fake .

Covid - no reason not to trust CDC/FDA .

(I don't know what video he is referring to; perhaps some "January 6 committee" video?) .

My reply to that: .

Here is a good video showing how corrupt our government, hospitals, and schools have been in regard to covid funding. .

AJ DePriest Uncovers The Enormous Covid Bribes To All Education And Hospitals From The US Government (bitchute.com) .

And a follow-up email by me because he hadn't responded yet: .

Here is a good article about how Dept. of Defense is trying to hide the undeniable evidence of harm caused by the covid shots: .

DMED data is explosive. Mainstream media has been ordered to ignore it. (substack.com) .

He did finally respond with: .

I have no time for conspiracies right now....sorry, .

My response to that: .

Yes! It is definitely a conspiracy! There are REAL doctors, REAL scientists, and REAL journalists who are exposing the crimes associated with covid! Do you really think the likes of NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, and their Democrat politician partners, are actually reporting what is going on with covid and so many other things? Covid is a trillion dollar + industry! The covid shots effects are well documented now, it's only a matter of time before the evidence is just too massive for the MSM to ignore, or try to explain away. .

I don't expect another reply from him :) .

The most telling thing he said was "Covid - no reason not to trust CDC/FDA"! .

This man is intelligent and highly-educated. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink (but MSM has certainly offers a lot of coolaide that millions drink :) )

Good morning pedes! When I was house shopping in 2020, I noticed a weird phenomena that may have been going on for an unknown amount of time. I was seeing houses that were selling for the "going rate", but when I looked into the prior sales history, there would be buyer A who bought at the "going rate" from seller A (up to a few years in the past, then buyer A would sell it to buyer B for an incredibly reduced amount, and then buyer B would sell it at the present "going rate". It didn't seem like cases of "foreclosure-house trashed by occupant-then sold and re-modeled, and then sold at going rate", and it seemed like it could be a money laundering scheme, so much so, that I contacted the local FBI office (before I knew about how corrupt they have become) to report what I had observed, but never heard back from them :) If the first two parties involved are in on it, then it seems that it could be a way to launder money. There could be the "tax loss tax savings" on the first sale, and since there is not capital gains tax now, the second sale would have no income tax implications. I was just looking at mostly one county in NY, so the potential totals across a wider area could be massive. What say you?

This just hit me. Maybe it has been obvious to others for a while, but maybe the covid swab tests do nothing but detect covid virus deposited in a person's throat or nasal cavities (perhaps mouth too). Perhaps the tests are not determining if a person has covid, yet they are treating all positive tests as if a person is infected with covid (omicron). I bet if all of us went out and got a test, many of us would test positive, only because we happened to have walked by someone who had covid virus in THEIR mouth, nose, or throat, and some became airborne, and then we get it inside of our mouth, nose, or throat, and then, if tested, with the multiplication they do with the tests, a positive would result. I knew they wanted all these tests to jack up the numbers, but I had always thought it was to jack up the numbers of people who truly were infected with covid, but I believe it's just to jack up the numbers, with most probably just temporary vessels of the virus, with their own immune system knocking it out (unless they got a covid shot, then they'll probably come down with a case of covid :) )

We have one of those "local" cable tv news stations, that pretty much parrots regional or national MSM (I watch for the weather forecast and some locally relevant news) in southern NY (NYC is location for rest of MSM broadcast on tv here). This morning, they reported on one of the Big Pharma companies coming out with a "vaccine" specifically for omicron,but stated boosters would be required in six months. I don't think I need to explain the ridiculousness of this on several levels for people here, but what I was amazed at was the straight face the reporter had in reporting it.

Here in NY (NYC tv stations, maybe it's only there), they run commercials all the time where they put these medical organization clowns on talking about how important it is to get tested all the time; it's really ridiculous! But that got me to thinking; why? Well here is my theory: They want to keep as many people as possible from getting omicron, because they know it isn't that dangerous, will provide immunity to the next variant, and if it were to infect enough people to be considered to have reached true "herd immunity", covid, as the deep state and MSM has been portraying it, would come to an end.

I just checked twitter. There is some medical doctor still posting stuff about how irresponsible it is for people to not wear masks. The comments to it indicate that people still think covid is some deadly disease to be very afraid of! Even leftist media reports that omicron is not that dangerous, so I don't know how these people are still so afraid of covid.

I believe the covid shots were worth having for elderly and immune compromised people early in the pandemic, when the shots were developed for the viral variant that was initially out. But now, it is abundantly clear the covid shots are useless at best, and evidence suggests they increase the risk of infection, and of course, the side effects and unknown future side effects. The covid shots should have never been given to children, and I believe that the continued push to have children get the shots is the biggest crime of all the crimes associated with covid.

How many people here believe you spend too much time on this site, but do it anyway? :) If you are like me, you read the posts here for two reasons, to get news that MSM omits, and to see how far along "the plan" appears to be progressing. We can't do much about either, for the most part (some calls to elected officials can make some difference in some cases), but there just seems to be an attraction, almost like I don't want to miss something :)