1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a friend that told me he was "bullet proof" because he had the covid shot and a booster! I know when not to try to talk sense to people, so I let him continue in his delusion.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real clincher is that global temperatures always fluctuate, and warmer periods are good for humanity, while cool periods are associated with periods of starvation and disease.

0
PhDinNY 0 points ago +1 / -1

And this morning CBS showed a poll where Heelsup and Trump had 42%, and Kennedy had 6%.

4
PhDinNY 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has anyone done a photo comparison of the "Biden" making the speech last night, versus the "Biden" of the previous year?

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Dems behind our Federal offices don't care who wins, as long as they have a "D" by their name on the ballot. combine that with their TDS, it's not surprising so much would be raised in a short time.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, I guess that's enough time. I wonder why they don't show a more recent photo?

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guy in this and other images has long hair, but the kid they show for news purposes has short hair. The question is, was there enough time passing between the date of the photos to allow hair to grow that long?

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mixed answers come back to this question. I need a Constitutional scholar to provide the definitive answer (but of course, the leftists out there wouldn't care)

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to everything I have read, anyone born in the U.S., regardless of who their parents are, is a "natural born citizen". If the person is born overseas, and at least one parent is not a U.S. citizen, then they would not qualify as "natural born". If born to two U.S. citizens overseas, I believe they still are considered a U.S. citizen, but I don't know if they are considered "natural born", but since noname was born in Panama to two U.S. citizens, and was considered eligible to run for President, that doesn't seem to matter. (but I think the whole "natural born" thing is moot at this point in history)

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes! I heard that only if a candidate dies can they easily change who appears on ballots. The ineligibility of Cameltoe will probably result in them coming up with the new candidate during the Dem convention.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was worried that a replacement for Biden might put re-election of Trump in jeopardy, and now, if Harris remains as the eventual Dem nominee, I think it would be even bigger assurance of Trump being re-elected.

2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

I sure hope that their crimes are publicly, and undeniably, revealed. My Democrat relatives are part of the group who STILL are in the control of MSM, and absolutely can't articulate why they are Democrats and why they hate Trump. Maybe, just maybe, they could be shaken awake if the truth is broadcast on their favorite leftist tv network.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's probably why they made sure this happened now instead of in a few more weeks, because early voting starts pretty early in some states.

3
PhDinNY 3 points ago +3 / -0

Almost sounds like what they did to humans with the covid shots.

4
PhDinNY 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was so disgusted to hear that they actually designated that Stonewall place a "National Monument"! The stuff the Biden administration does is beyond belief!

2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! I started my computer today and the first thing was a MS message telling me my computer hasn't been totally set up yet (I've had it since 2016) and asking if I want to complete it, I clicked the "later" option, then came here to find your post! Done!

2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just bought 30 shares of djt

by PhDinNY
1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reposted with edited image

by PhDinNY
2
PhDinNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

I reposted with your suggestion; I don't know how to replace an image once posted.

view more: Next ›