-5
RightOnQue -5 points ago +1 / -6

He's not selling "a couple", he's doing better business than he ever did prior to the election.

all you do is discourage

I'm sorry that you confuse me wanting to deal with truth and facts only with me being discouraging. If you consistently, over and over and over again find the truth to be discouraging, what does that tell you?

-3
RightOnQue -3 points ago +1 / -4

He hasn't revealed or proven anything, so there's no reaction

2
RightOnQue 2 points ago +5 / -3

Do you want to be fed bullshit that makes you feel good or would you prefer the actual facts? If you aren't interested in the truth then just go watch TV or something Getting angry when someone debunks something you want to be true isn't healthy, a it's a sign of an inability to think critically

0
RightOnQue 0 points ago +2 / -2

You haven't looked into this at all. have you? McAfee sold the company 20 years ago, he's had no involvement whatsoever, including with the software which has gone through dozens of generations since he was last affiliated.

0
RightOnQue 0 points ago +2 / -2

McAfee sold the company and all it's IP, patents and assets over 20 years ago. He's had nothing to do with the company in decades, and the software that's currently in use - and being referenced here - is many generations removed from his original coding, nor is it even remotely similar. This is possibly the biggest bunch of nothingness I've seen posted.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
RightOnQue 1 point ago +4 / -3

The Military plan as we now know is called Devolution.

What are you talking about? Devolution is just the name some rando dude on the internet gave to his own personal hypothesis.

-1
RightOnQue -1 points ago +1 / -2
  1. Pence did not have the authority to do what you're suggesting.
  2. Those states did not "report massive irregularities in vote totals".
  3. No states are in the process of "decertifying".
  4. There's no such thing as decertifying", and it's not going to happen.
-1
RightOnQue -1 points ago +1 / -2

It didn't. The post made no such prediction whatsoever, it was just vague nothingness that after the fact was retconned to mean it was a prediction of his death

-3
RightOnQue -3 points ago +1 / -4

You mean the military intelligence/political insider that doesn't even understand the definition of impeachment and how it works, as evidenced by his repeated claims that Trump was never impeached? That dude is a fraud and a clown, ignore anything he says.

-6
RightOnQue -6 points ago +2 / -8

Anyone who doesn't understand that this is part of the safety protocol deployment to scan for potential threats - something the Guard themselves have made multiple statements on - and instead thinks this was the troops snubbing the president probably isn't knowledgeable enough to be having these types of discussions at all.

-8
RightOnQue -8 points ago +2 / -10

Clearly they don't, since they were either mistaken or deliberately lying about both pics being taken at the same church, because they definitely were not.

-6
RightOnQue -6 points ago +3 / -9

That's not true. Clinton's pic - which absolutely was posted to the internet prior - was taken at Foundry United Methodist, which is the church he attended semi-regularly while in DC., and was snapped as he was leaving a service. It was not a pre-planned, staged photo op. Outside of both men holding bibles, there are zero similarities between them. Before anyone claims "fake news!" instead of doing their own research (ahem!), the stone work on the church in Clinton's pic can't ne found anywhere on the grounds at St. John's, and debunking the lie that they were taken at the same church was extremely simple. Which begs the question: How come such a powerful arm of military intelligence didn't know they were taken at difference churches, and why was someone with their resources not able to find that out for themselves, instead of harming their own credibility by spreading an easily disproven lie?

-1
RightOnQue -1 points ago +1 / -2

TLDR

I stopped reading after the typical nonsense pedo accusation (call all our critics pedos, that will make them go away!), because that's your emergency "Get out of debate free" card). When you can't defend your position you resort to name calling. And the barrage of terrible grammar and punctuation sealed the deal that nothing you wrote, say or think is worth giving any attention to.

-1
RightOnQue -1 points ago +1 / -2

And yet there's not a shred of evidence, nor a single victim anywhere among them

-2
RightOnQue -2 points ago +1 / -3

None of that matters. You could have been a good parent to them up until this point, but that's negated by the fact that you'd make your kids watch people be executed. That you think children who aren't even in the double digits in age yet should be allowed, much less encouraged or even forced, to watch something so horrific that they don't have the capacity to understand. completely oblivious (or indifferent) to the very real possibility that it would leave them mentally and emotionally scarred and perhaps even traumatized, tormented by iifelong bouts of PTSD tells me that you have NO BUSINESS raising these children currently.

Only one of us is a monster. Hint: It's the one who wants his pre-adolescent children to watch men and women cry, beg and plead for their lives seconds before their necks are snapped and they dangle lifelessly while staring out of cold, lifeless eyes. What the FUCK is wrong with you?

view more: Next ›