I was recently informed in comments here at The Great Awakening of something that I didn't previously know: that most of the current January 6 prisoners were arrested after Trump left office on January 20, and that he thus couldn't have pardoned them, and most of those arrested before he left office have already been let go and contained a high number of Antifa and glowies.

I have recently been debating people who are anti-Trump because they believe he betrayed his supporters by not pardoning them. If the info that I received here is correct, it could be useful ammo against their arguments. If it is indeed true, does anyone know of good documentation (that normies would find credible) showing that most January 6 arrests were made after January 20 and most of the ones arrested prior to that have been freed?

I recently had an online discussion with someone who believes that Trump is an utter failure and a cautionary tale because he "betrayed his supporters" by not pardoning the January 6 prisoners.

He had written the following:

Donald Trump squandered his shot. Now he’s paying for his failure. Many of the people who put their faith in him already are.

That last point is why Trump has proven unfit to lead and why no rational person should support him, even if he somehow makes it out of this mess he made. Trump has insufficient loyalty to his followers. That is not a momentary lapse of judgment. It is a persistent character flaw. When the chips are down, he will abandon his people again.

Barring some road to Damascus moment, that is. But even if Trump has a profound change of heart, he will need to prove it with concrete results before anyone should consider trusting him again.

Like all tragedies, Trump’s negative example can be an occasion for greater good. Otherwise smart, well-meaning people in positions of influence can take Trump’s removal from the board as a valuable lesson. There is no voting our way out of this – not with the electoral system totally compromised. Nor do we need a Boomer TV daddy to swoop in and save us.

In the discussion between him and me that followed, he wrote this as a response to one of my comments:

As for Trump’s loyalty, tell that to the hundreds of his supporters imprisoned in his name for January 6. He could have pardoned them before leaving office but left them to rot. Instead, he released thousands of black felons onto the streets.

I responded:

Pardoning them would have removed even the limited Republican Congressional and Senate support that he had during his impeachment trial, which was already barely enough to prevent him from being convicted. He would have been convicted in his impeachment and sent to jail for inciting an insurrection. The intelligence agencies would have tracked down thousands of other Trump supporters who were at the January 6 rally (using cell phone data) to arrest in retaliation for the ones that would have been pardoned. It would have been a suicide move; sometimes it’s necessary to live to fight another day.

Him:

That’s the problem with parroting talking points you hear online without stopping to think first. If you had, you’d have seen how the argument negates itself.

If a system is corrupt enough to tell the President “We’re illegally imprisoning and torturing these 300 people, and if you pardon them, we’ll imprison you and thousands more,” it is too corrupt to be bargained with. There are no checks to prevent it from prosecuting the President and his followers anyway.

Which is what we are seeing happen now. The FBI raided an ex-president’s home. Then they stopped a sitting congressman in transit and seized his phone. Leftist influencers are now calling for ordinary Trump voters to be arrested and crushed and their children orphaned. Who’s going to stop them? The same Republicans who threatened to convict Trump if he’d pardoned those same people?

The day the system proved itself illegitimate was the day Trump should have stood and fought (peacefully). Running to fight another day turned into just running. Now he’ll be jailed anyway. And so will many of his supporters.

Defending him now requires the same rationalization battered wives use to justify their abuse. It serves no one.

Another person in a follow-up discussion wrote this;

I can only speak for myself, but that is when he lost me. The Qult, as you call it, can torture language and logic all they want to rationalize this, but it’s betrayal, pure and simple. No good and decent man would have done this in the face of what Trump stood against.

If he was smart enough to be 10 steps ahead of the Deep State, or play the imaginary 4D chess at master level, as the Qultists frequently claim, he would have easily been able to predict the results of this betrayal.

What are your thoughts on this point of view?

I remember President Trump saying something a while back to the effect that he cannot save us and only Jesus can, but can't currently find the quote. Can someone please help me find it, ideally in a way that I can cite exactly when it's from?

In your view, are there compelling instances of what seems like divine intervention either on Trump's behalf or regarding him in some way?

If so, could you share some examples and why you believe that they could be Providential?

In the new Batman movie "The Batman", the main villain is the Riddler, presented as a Zodiac-style serial killer. He discovers hidden dirt on corrupt politicians and police officials, and targets these corrupt individuals for murder. He captures them and kills them in cruel ways (such as making rats burrow through the body of one), and leaves cryptic clues for Batman with the bodies. Once deciphered, these clues all lead Batman to discover the dirty secrets of the corrupt people killed by the Riddler (sort of like how the clues in Q drops help people discover the hidden dirt on politicians in real life).

Using the clues left by the Riddler, Batman discovers that virtually the entire Gotham City government and police force are corrupt and working for gangsters. He attempts to both clean up the corruption and catch the Riddler, although at one point, he questions whether cleaning up the corruption is feasible, as he fears that removing all of the corruption would destroy the city by completely taking out its government and law enforcement and leaving it in a state of anarchy.

All of the corrupt people are white men, and the only major incorruptible leader in the Gotham law enforcement is a race-swapped, black James Gordon (who is not yet Commissioner). Catwoman (also race-swapped) refers to the cabal of gangsters and corrupt government officials as "white privileged assholes".

Eventually, the Riddler is captured and is revealed to be an autistic incel. Batman discovers too late that the Riddler intended himself to be caught because the jailhouse is one of the few places in Gotham above sea level and is thus safe in a flood, has placed time bombs in key locations that cause the sea wall around Gotham to collapse and Gotham to be struck by a catastrophic flood, and has used the Internet to radicalize a cult of 500 followers (very similar to how the media portrays Q believers as being cultists being led by some basement-dwelling hacker). At one point, the screen names of some of these followers are shown, and one of them has the name "HoldTheLine". The Riddler also has a poster with the name "Don" written on it in big letters on the wall of his apartment.

The Riddler has convinced several of his followers to dress up like him and (on election night) assassinate the new Mayor with hunting rifles right as the flood happens. This new Mayor is a black woman who is presented in the movie as a sort of soulful saint female version of Barack Obama (as he is viewed by the Left). She is depicted as incorruptible and fiercely devoted to ending the corruption and helping the people of Gotham. Her campaign slogan is "Change". But the Riddler doesn't trust her because, while he didn't find any dirt on her like he did with the other politicians, he is so cynical that he believes all Gotham politicians who promise change are inherently lying and corrupt. So he wants to wash Gotham clean of its corruption and evil by unleashing a flood on it, while simultaneously having his followers kill the Mayor.

One of the Riddler's followers manages to shoot the Mayor, but she doesn't die. Batman fights and defeats all of the would-be assassins, then dives into the floodwaters to rescue drowning Gothamites. There's a montage later that shows the Mayor leading Gotham into a brighter, less corrupt future with an uplifting speech, while Batman helps save people stranded in the floodwaters in a scene reminiscent of footage of rescue teams after Hurricane Katrina.

Essentially, the movie's message (if one applies it as an analogy to the current-day U.S.) is that Q believers are basement-dwelling, incel terrorists-in-waiting who are right about there being government corruption but too blind to see that the corruption is caused by the white male patriarchy and can be fixed by voting in "Hope and Change" Obama types.

I'm looking for a good article or video that explains the truth about the Russia/Ukraine situation (ie, what's really happening and what lies the media and government are telling) in an easy to understand way, and which can be shared with people who aren't into or don't trust Q.

Does anyone have any recommendations?

It's too early to tell what the new vaccine developed by the military is. It could be even worse poison than the Pfizer/Moderna/Johnson & Johnson ones, or it could be a genuinely safe and effective inoculation against catching COVID-19, SARS, and all sub-variants as it is claimed to be. Maybe it can even prevent harm from the existing shots (perhaps by absorbing spike proteins).

My theory referenced in the title is that if the military vaccine is a white hat-developed genuine preventative, we may soon see the mainstream media narrative flip.

If the military vaccine was developed by white hats (or is the Elites' antidote and was somehow stolen from them) it could possibly bring the plandemic to a screeching halt.

Firstly, if it truly fully prevents all those who take it from getting sick from SARS, COVID-19, and all related viruses and all variants thereof as advertised, the endless fearmongering over new strains ends immediately. It's "one and done". You get the shot and you're safe.

Secondly, it removes all justification for vaccine mandates. The excuse for the mandates is that the vaccines won't work until everyone has taken them. Whenever a vaccinated person catches the virus, the excuse is that they were somehow infected by an unvaccinated person. It makes no logical sense, but that's the justification used for the mandates. If the military vaccine fully protects those who take it, the notion of "you need to get vaccinated to protect me" goes out the window. The unvaccinated can only be blamed if they themselves get sick, as the vaccinated would no longer be at any risk, even if someone with the virus coughed right in their faces. Thus, the "for the greater good" argument against bodily autonomy would crumble.

Right now, the media narrative is "Get vaccinated or die and also be a murderer because you'll be causing everyone else to die too!" But if the military vaccine proves to actually work as advertised, I believe this narrative will flip on a dime. The last thing the media and their owners want is an end to the plandemic. A truly effective vaccine could end it.

So if the military vaccine is truly effective and the media fails to cover this fact up, they will probably suddenly start acknowledging that the existing "vaccines" are really poison that causes myocarditis and other severe health problems (claiming, of course, that Pfizer, Moderna, etc, were lying to them and they had no way to know better), but will also lump the military vaccine in with them (claiming that its potential side effects are too dangerous to warrant its use, despite its effectiveness at preventing infection with the virus) and essentially become full anti-vaxxers, at least as far as COVID-19 is concerned. Instead of "lockdowns or vaccines, pick your poison", they will suddenly push lockdowns as the only solution.

This would be throwing the pharmaceutical companies under the bus, but as far as they are concerned, anyone is expendable in the pursuit of their goals.

There are rumors that President Trump will run for Congress in 2022, and that if there's a "red wave", he could become the Speaker of the House. He hasn't made any such announcement, but it's possible that he will in the future. When asked about it, Matt Gaetz smiled and said that he liked the idea.

I have a theory that if the rumor is true, this could be how he returns to the White House. Becoming Speaker of the House would put him first in line for the position of Acting President if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were to both be ousted.

It seems obvious at this point that the reason that Biden hasn't been ousted through the 25th Amendment despite his blatantly obvious dementia is that the Democrats want to wait until he has served at least two years and one day (January 21, 2023) to get rid of him, so that his successor would be able to technically serve less than half a term and thus be able to run for two more (serving a total of ten years, minus a day or two).

They presumably intended in the beginning to replace him with Kamala Harris, and that may still be their plan. However, considering the rumors of Harris being on outs with Biden and possibly others within the Democrat Party, it's possible that they now want to get rid of both Biden and Harris and put in Nancy Pelosi (who is currently first in line if both Biden and Harris are ousted). Or maybe President Pelosi was plan A from the beginning.

On January 12, President Trump said:

The 25th Amendment is of zero risk to me, but will come back to haunt Joe Biden and the Biden administration. As the expression goes, be careful what you wish for.

Notice that he says that the 25th Amendment "will" (not "might" or "may") come back to haunt not only Biden himself, but the entire Biden administration (which presumably would include Kamala Harris).

Could it be that this was a hint that by the time the Democrats are ready to oust Biden through the 25th Amendment, Nancy Pelosi will be replaced by Speaker of the House Trump, and something will happen to remove Harris from the presidency as well, ending the Biden administration and bringing back the Trump administration for slightly less than two years, allowing for a 2024 presidential run and another four-year term?

One theory I've seen is that the vaccines were intended by the Deep State to be more deadly than they are, and Operation Warp Speed was meant to force them to be released before they were fully weaponized.

But what if the opposite is true? What if the vaccines are intended to perform some nefarious function other than causing death (such as destroying the natural immune system to keep the vaccinated dependent on boosters for the rest of their lives, injecting nanobots to link the brain and nervous system with an AI for mind control purposes, or something else entirely) - or to only cause death after some extended period of time (perhaps years), and the Deep State wanted to perfect them to the point that they caused no deaths or obvious health problems once injected, and thus seemed harmless (meaning there would be virtually no pushback against taking them)?

This would mean that the vaccines, once perfected, would seem harmless, and those arguing that they are dangerous would be ignored and mocked even far worse than they are now, since no one would be dying, getting heart inflammation, etc from the vaccines. Instead, the vaccines would be a time bomb that that is so stealthy that it doesn't even tick, and the nefarious aspects of them wouldn't be evident until it was too late. This would also make it harder to argue against vaccine mandates, or even to convince anyone to bother standing up against a "harmless" vaccine.

This would mean that Operation Warp Speed was intended to force the vaccines to be released to the public when their dangerous nature would be far more evident, rather than later when they would still be dangerous, but so stealthy as to fool even many who are now awake to their dangers.

What do you think of this theory?

The Maguffin of the new James Bond movie "No Time to Die" (which was made before the Coronavirus outbreak and its release delayed due to it) is the Heracles virus, a programmable nanobot "virus" secretly created by MI6 on orders of M. It is highly contagious and can be programmed to be harmless to anyone except those that it is programmed to kill. All one has to do in order to use it is to program it to target a person, group, or type of person, then infect someone in their general area. Eventually, it will spread harmlessly from person to person until it reaches and kills the intended target.

Safin, the movie's villain, steals the virus and programs it to kill members of Spectre (as he has a grudge against Spectre).

Later, Safin decides to sell the virus to the highest bidder, knowing that it would be used by the buyers to exterminate millions (if not billions) of people and (in his words) make the world "a little tidier". His justification is that "people want oblivion" and don't desire free will.

At the end of the movie, Safin programs some of the virus to kill Bond's wife and daughter and infects Bond with it. Bond allows himself to be blown up to prevent the possibility of ever infecting them. Au revour, 007.

All of this has creepy parallels to recent events (or at least some theories regarding them). There has been much talk of the Coronavirus "vaccines" possibly containing nanobots or some time of programming or intelligence. It makes me wonder if "No Time to Die" is some sort of predictive programming offering clues into what is happening.

Could it be that vaccine deaths aren't random? Could the jab be, for example, harmless to people with certain genes (or other biological factors) but not people with others?

We now all know that there was U.S. involvement in the creation of COVID-19, and that Anthony Fauci himself was involved. But it is still generally assumed that the Chinese government was involved as well.

What if it wasn't? What if the lab in Wuhan was working for the U.S. Deep State unbeknownst to the Chinese government? What if the Chinese government is telling the truth when it denies responsibility for the virus?

If you want to frame someone for a hit-and-run, you don't frame a little old lady from Pasadena who only drives her car to church on Sundays. You frame an alcoholic or drug addict with prior driving infractions. When picking a patsy, you always pick someone who plausibly seems like the type of person who would do it.

Would the Chinese Communist Party attack us with a bio-weapon? I have no doubt that they would if they thought it was to their advantage. But would and did are two different things. And the fact that the CCP is the type to do such a thing makes them the perfect patsy for a frame-up.

Such a frame-up would serve at least two purposes. Firstly, it would keep the Left and Right fighting over whether or not to blame the CCP, while no one is pointing fingers at the real culprit: the U.S. Deep State. Secondly, it could help escalate war (or at least a breakdown in relations) between the U.S. and China, which could possibly benefit the Deep State. If it's true that Plan A was to have Hillary Clinton start a nuclear war with Russia, maybe a war with China is their Plan B.

This is all speculation, of course. But I think it's a possibility worth considering.

What is the best way to buy ivermectin online without a prescription? Are there any websites it can be ordered from?

My 70 year old mother is currently very sick. She got a urinary tract infection a few days ago (which is fairly common for her), but this one seems to have more staying power than usual. In addition, she is having a bad bout of high blood pressure and hasn't been able to fall asleep for more than 2 hours a day for the past 4 days, as well as nausea and fatigue. She also has a bad flare-up of Candida Albicans (which she has struggled with for decades). She can currently barely eat (all she can tolerate is boiled eggs). She can't talk loudly, and can't move much.

Worse yet, the "medicines" the doctor gave her made her worse (it turns out that they have side effects that can affect the nervous system, and she already doesn't have a good nervous system). She didn't figure this out until she had already taken them. It's a perfect storm of multiple problems at once. I've never seen her like this before.

She went to the hospital, but they wouldn't keep her because they said they don't keep anyone who can walk (even though she was having to grip objects to walk and was shaking).

She said that in her current weakened state, her body can't even process additives in natural supplements (such as fillers in herb capsules), so she can only take supplements that are pure without fillers, additives, etc.

She compiled a list of supplements to order for her, but her handwriting is so bad that I can't make most of them out (I was able to decipher curcumin, oregano oil, and hawthorn berry), and she can't talk well enough to help me figure out the rest.

Does anyone have any advice? And can you please pray for her to heal?

There has been much talk about section 11. 3 in the DoD War Manual, with many believing that it is the 11.3 referred to in Q Drop 26 ("The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies AS 1ST MARKER).").

However, many people seem to assume that 11.3 has already verified (with the China-controlled Biden/Harris administration being the belligerent occupation referred to in the manual. However, what almost everyone seems to have missed is this phrasing of the title of section 11.3:

"End of Occupation and Duration of GC Obligations"

Notice it now? End of occupation. Not beginning. End. This means that if Drop 26 is indeed referring to the DoD War Manual, 11.3 has not verified. It will verify when the Biden/Harris occupation of Washington D.C. ends. That could mean that the Storm doesn't begin until Biden and Harris are out.