Q Drop 55 famously says:
However, it doesn't say who the tweet will be from. It is often assumed that it would come from President Trump, but that is by no means guaranteed.
The phrase "my fellow Americans" is traditionally associated with presidents, so it does seem likely that it would be a presidential account. But which president?
Today, I had the epiphany that the phrase "the Storm is upon us" sounds foreboding rather than triumphant. For a storm to be upon you is generally not a good thing. It means that you're about to be pummeled by high winds, rain, hail, and who knows what else. So it sounds like a statement that would come from the point of view of someone who is about to be done in by the Storm.
So could the tweet be from a Deep State president (or at least the account of one)?
I have believed for several years now that there is a plan at work - not the Q plan (although that may also be in play) but a plan by God.
Part of this is because there's a pattern - too often to be chance - of every plot to take President Trump out once and for all (impeachments, court trials, and now an assassination attempt) ending more or less like Wile E. Coyote's schemes in a Road Runner cartoon, with the schemers taking an anvil to the top of the head while Trump remains unscathed.
Also, the timing of Ruth Bader Ginsberg's death strikes me as providential. She died more or less exactly as late as possible without allowing a liberal Justice to replace her and keep Roe v. Wade alive, as if she was mercifully allowed - perhaps even through miraculous extension of her life - the maximum time possible to live and potentially repent without getting in the way of Roe v. Wade ending.
Another part is because in the depths of despair after the 2020 election theft, I prayed for signs for what to expect, and received what I believe are indeed signs from God, not with any specific details regarding exactly what will happen, but confirming that His mercy is at work in this nation and that Trump is involved in His plan.
Knowing that God likes to turn the plans of the wicked against them, I have thought of one possible scenario that may play out as regards the upcoming election. To be clear, the following scenario is pure speculation, but I think it's quite possible.
Here's the scenario:
The election results (possibly after a multiple-day counting delay) come back showing Trump as the winner, despite any fraud at play in the election.
The Democrats and MSM immediately start crying fraud. They spread the narrative that Trump stole the election, and file lawsuits.
The courts throw the lawsuits out for laches or lack of standing, in keeping with their actions in 2020.
On January 6, 2025, Kamala Harris (if she is still Vice President) or whoever is Vice President at the time may want - and maybe even attempt - to avoid certifying the election results, and perhaps others present (especially Jamie Raskin) do as well.
A relevant quote regarding Raskin from an American Thinker article:
Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin has also revealed what appears to be a Plan B in the event the CISA/FBI election night plan that is disguised as a “warning” fails to prevent a Trump victory. In a clip that deserves far more scrutiny, Raskin painted a grim picture of how January 6th, 2025 (the day Congress would meet to officially certify Trump’s general election win) might unfold. According to Raskin, it will be “up to us (Congress) to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified, and then we’ll need bodyguards for everybody due to civil war conditions.” Raskin alludes to language regarding insurrection found in section 3 of the 14th Amendment as a means of disqualifying Trump from taking office even if he wins the election. In layman’s terms, section 3 bars anybody who has ever engaged in insurrection from holding public office.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/08/will_democrats_repeat_the_fraud_of_2020.html
However, due to Trump's acquittal in his second impeachment trial, any attempt to disqualify him under the 14th Amendment fails. More importantly, Trump's victory is certified because Congress' 2022 rule changes (a response to January 6) come back to bite them:
On Jan. 6, Trump targeted Congress’ ratification of the Electoral College’s vote. He tried to exploit the vice president’s role in reading out the states’ electors to get Mike Pence to block Biden from becoming the next president by omitting some states Biden won from the roll. The new provisions make clear that the vice president’s responsibilities in the process are merely ceremonial and that the vice president has no say in determining who actually won the election.
The new legislation also raises the threshold required for members of Congress to object to certifying the electors. Before, only one member of the House and Senate respectively had to object to force a roll call vote on a state’s electors. That helped make objections to new presidents something of a routine partisan tactic — Democrats objected to certifying both of George W. Bush’s elections and Trump’s in 2016.
Those objections, however, were mainly symbolic and came after Democrats had conceded that the Republican candidates won the presidency. On Jan. 6, 2021, Republicans forced a vote on certifying Biden’s wins in Arizona and Pennsylvania even after the violent attack on the Capitol, as Trump continued to insist falsely that he won the election. That led some members of Congress to worry the process could be too easily manipulated.
Under the new rules, one-fifth of each chamber would be required to force a vote on states’ slates of electors.
A massive (openly) leftist mob is present in Washington D.C. on January 6 in order to protest the certification of Trump's victory. They commit violence and destruction, and perhaps storm the Capitol building. They may even commit acts that fall under the legal definition of insurrection. The media, of course, defends them.
In short, the scenario is one in which everything that happened (or was alleged to happen, as in the case of the January 6 "insurrection") in the 2020 election and its aftermath happens in reverse, with the Democrats and Deep State getting a taste of their own medicine at each step of the way.
Again, it's pure speculation. But it's possible, and quite frankly, would be delicious to see unfold.
Right after the 2020 election was called for Joe Biden, there was a video released (on November 7) of Kamala Harris calling Biden and saying "We did it, Joe!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3lpFE19T78
In July 2024, Harris made a public appearance in which Biden supposedly called in live (some people think it was an AI voice) over the phone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPp5I0j9GBM
Also in July 2024, there was a video of Kamala Harris being called over the phone by the Obamas to announce that they were endorsing her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt0jHTUg0RI
Now there's a new video of her calling Tim Walz to tell him that she has picked him as her running mate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-DZg7QXGCs
All of these instances are obviously staged. I also seem to vaguely recall one or two other similar staged calls with Kamala Harris (I think one was between her and a celebrity).
[EDIT: Thanks to u/winn in the moments below, I found out that the call with a celebrity that I vaguely remembered was this one with Taraji P. Henson:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5pnNZ9bM14
And thanks to u/AllMostThere, I found out about this incident I'd never heard before:
Why? I don't recall any other politician participating in so many clearly staged, filmed phone calls. Why does Kamala Harris do it so much? It's like a trademark for her at this point.
I've been seeing a lot of debate on the new GOP platform elsewhere, but there has been very little discussion of it here. Allegedly, the new platform was created almost entirely by the Trump-loyal parts of the RNC (Lara Trump, etc), with some claiming that it's essentially a Trump campaign ad more than a traditional party platform.
Here's the full text:
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2024-republican-party-platform
I have seen many complaints from cultural conservatives about two major differences from previous GOP platforms: the lack of a call for a nationwide abortion ban and the lack of an affirmation that marriage is between and man and a woman. Log Cabin Republicans, on the other hand, have praised the latter change. However, there has been much less discussion of the other parts of the platform, many of which I think are quite promising.
What do you think of the new platform?
I have a friend who has mostly been very pro-Trump for years, but sometimes falters in his support because he sees Trump as too pro-LGBT (he was considering switching support to DeSantis earlier this year for that reason). In a nutshell, he is a devout Evangelical Christian (Church of Christ) and has obsessive-compulsive disorder, the combination of which leads him to be laser-focused on homosexuality as the #1 thing he is against. He's within a hair's breadth of being a one-issue voter on the subject, and he sees anyone giving even the slightest condonement of homosexuality as a grave issue and the mark of one who has forsaken Godliness and Biblical truth in search of the World's favor.
He is now upset that the Republican Party has allegedly updated its platform to be pro-gay, supposedly due to Trump's influence.
He sent me emails in which he said the GOP is being taken over by the LGBT movement and is becoming evil. One of the emails contained this link:
https://x.com/realJennaEllis/status/1812944006592299084
In case you don't want to click the link, it's a tweet by Jenna Ellis reading as follows:
President of Log Cabin Republicans thanks Donald Trump for stripping the GOP platform of all “anti-LGBT” language.
Says “inclusion won!”
Your new GOP: woke godless populism."
Another of his emails had these two links:
https://x.com/Mark_McEathron/status/1813063651106193822
The tweet above features the infamous Hillary Clinton balloon reaction GIF and reads:
"Pro-Abortion Speakers Pro-LGBTQ Speakers Union Boss Speakers Slut Life Speakers
Is the GOP the 1990's Democrat Party now?"
https://x.com/ShannonJoyRadio/status/1813038321083597286
And the final tweet above features the Shannon Joy quote:
"Trump is a true champion for the LGBTQ movement!"
...and Joy's quote-tweet of a Charles T. Moran tweet reading:
"It’s official! The national GOP platform has been stripped of all anti-LGBT language! Inclusion won! Thank you @realDonaldTrump!"
He also sent me yet another email, containing this tweet:
https://x.com/LovemyFLGov/status/1813060685447745686
Which reads:
The Republican Party is moving left. I’m not going with them. I’m also not drooling and slobbering over Trump and his VP pick. I praise God that Trump did not get killed but I haven’t joined the cult.
He also sent an email titled "Demon GOP", which including a link to this tweet:
https://x.com/LaurenWitzkeDE/status/1813111478536270022
...which reads:
I turned the Harmeet Dhilon witchcraft off.
Worship of any other than Christ is as good as worshipping a demon.
Shame on the GOP.
He also asked me this:
"Donald Trump condones homosexuality, doesn't he?"
Firstly, how accurate is the "GOP is turning gay" narrative? I'm suspicious as to how accurate it is.
Secondly, how much influence did Trump truly have on this if it's true? Once again, I'm not automatically assuming a narrative is true just because the media is pushing it.
And thirdly and most importantly, what would be the best way to defend Trump to my friend in this situation? Keep in mind that he does not take kindly to "live and let live"-type arguments regarding homosexuality and especially gay marriage, viewing them as weakness leading straight down a combination slippery slope/road to hell. If by any chance you're familiar with the YouTuber/Twitter personality Melonie Mac, he's similar to her in views.
Have you ever heard the Connie Francis song "God Save America"? It's about a second American Civil War, and the lyrics feel very timely.
It was recorded in 1970, but the recording was lost and never released. Decades later, a copy of the original tape recording was found. Music and sound effects were recorded for it, and it was finally released in 2019. It crackles in places because of damage to the surviving tape, but is a fascinating song.
Here's the song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5fePnVdm6s
Here's the story behind it:
https://www.facebook.com/100044438949402/posts/2117573428329195/
I'm looking for some easy to understand, ideally fairly short (ie under 30 minutes) videos or articles that are normie-friendly and explain ESG and Blackrock and Vanguard's role in it. Does anyone have good recommendations?
Has anyone else here been following the Nelson Peltz/Disney situation? It's been going on for a while, but has now been heating up with the possible involvement of Elon Musk.
Peltz's fund management company Trian holds about $3 billion of Disney stock, and he is appealing to other Disney shareholders who are displeased with how the company is being run to vote for himself and former Disney CFO Jay Rasulo to replace Disney directors Michael Froman and Maria Elena Lagomasino in an upcoming Disney shareholder meeting. He is allied with former Marvel Studios CEO Ike Perlmutter (allegedly the mastermind behind the plan), who also owns a large amount of Disney stock.
Perlmutter is a fascinating individual, whose story I've been following for about 5 years. In a nutshell, he's a shrewd businessman who loathes Disney's tendency to put politics over profit, and (being a friend, neighbor, and major financial supporter of Donald Trump) also dislikes the company's leftist policies. He was ousted from his position of control over the MCU in 2015 by Kevin Feige and Bob Iger, as he was an obstacle to their plans to insert their preferred politics into the MCU. Not coincidentally, the MCU freefalled in terms of quality almost imediately afterward, then in profits a few years after that. Perlmutter has nursed a grudge against Bob Iger for nearly a decade now.
The plan is to get Peltz and Rasulo on Disney's board, and from there, leverage their positions to steer the entire ship in a different direction. They essentially want to do to Disney what Elon Musk did to Twitter, or as close to it as they can manage to achieve. Bob Iger (whose job is likely toast if the Peltz plan works) is doing everything within his power to combat Peltz, including launching a new website featuring a cartoon of Professor Ludwig Von Drake urging stockholders to vote for Disney's preferred slate of board nominees.
A few days ago, Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz were seen publicly together, and upon being asked what he was up to, Musk replied, "I'm just here with friends, thinking about companies to acquire." This has led to much speculation that he is joining in on the Peltz/Perlmutter Disney takeover plan in some way, possibly even as part of a plan to make him Disney's new owner. Musk also tweeted "Current Disney management is destroying the company. Time for change." about a week ago, and has recently been urging Gina Carano to file a lawsuit agaisnt Disney, She has now done so, and her lawsuit (which is funded by Musk) includes some details that are quite embarassing to Disney. The timing of this, as far as Musk is concerned, seems likely intended as a PR move to hurt Disney's optics with stockholders in advance of the upcoming vote.
Musk has been tweeting up a Disney-related storm today, including a tweet reading, "If you were discriminated against by Disney or its subsidiaries (ABC, ESPN, Marvel, etc), just reply to this post to receive legal support", posting a thinking face emoji in response to a tweet suggesting that he buy Disney, and more.
