Several Q drops use the phrase "Rig for Red", which is military slang for going on high alert (especially on a submarine). However, what if there's a double meaning?
If it's true that white hats were able to un-rig the 2016 election and monitor the rigging of the 2020 election, could it be that they have plans to straight-up rig the 2022 and 2024 elections "for Red" (ie, Republican), and possibly even rig the primaries to elect MAGA candidates?
Since the Deep State and media have been running with the narrative that election fraud didn't happen on any meaningful scale in 2020 and is even downright impossible, being cheated against would place them in a tough spot.
They couldn't acknowledge that their machines were hacked without causing people to consider whether the same happened in 2020. They also couldn't admit to any mail-in ballot fraud without destroying their narrative that it's completely trustworthy.
They would be stuck between a rock and a hard place: say that the election is legitimate and accept the most MAGA Congress and Senate in history, or admit that there was fraud and expose the untrustworthiness of their voting system.
There is a man named Timothy Dixon who is a sort of truck driver/traveling pastor. He claims to receive prophecies from God, often in the form of visions. He talks in detail about this on his YouTube channel, and never asks for donations. He doesn't seem to be out for money as far as I can tell.
I don't know whether he's a real prophet or not (such things can't be known for certain until something the person has said either comes true or is proven false). But some of what he is said is very interesting, and it may be worth looking out for indicators of whether what he says will come to pass or not.
I know that some people here are interested in such things (there's a lot of talk about Kim Clement, for example), so I thought some of you might be interested in hearing what he has to say.
A few of his claims:
President Trump will return to the presidency for one more term.
The leaders of America and other countries will be shaken this very month (he specified that such shaking would occur within thirty days in a video from February 23).
God allowed Biden to be installed in the White House to expose how deep the sin and corruption in America goes.
The Columbia River will run backward, causing massive power outages that will affect both the "wheat' and "tares" (ie, both the righteous and the wicked) and Multnomah Falls will run red like blood.
The Democrats are planning to remove Biden using the 25th Amendment, but he will die first of a heart attack. His wording seems to imply that they will try to keep his death a secret.
They are already planning on betraying Kamala Harris, which she knows. She will turn on them and destroy many of them (including Nancy Pelosi).
Most of the major social networks (including Facebook) will be destroyed through lawsuits and the like, and only two will be left standing.
Seven countries interfered with the election and President Trump actually got over 101 million votes. The Washington Post and New York Times will publish this information.
John Roberts will struggle with his conscience after receiving a horrifying night vision of blood dripping off of his hands and being judged by God, and will hand over documents (which will "change everything") in an envelope to a man wearing shiny shoes, a blue suit of some kind, and some sort of gold or brass adornments on his shoulders. This man will bring the documents to a "large-winged, strange-faced" building with four other men dressed like him and they will pass the documents around to hundreds of other people in the building.
Here's his channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpExguwC-moeDvtLMzw56kw
Here is one of his most major videos, in which he details a vision of President Trump's return, Joe Biden's death, Kamala Harris' destruction of various politicians, and some sort of whirlwind cleaning out the corruption. (He didn't name Biden and Harris by name as the two people doing these things in this video, but other of his videos make it clear that it's them.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcYeYUFpST8
Here's the video in which he talks about John Roberts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAlNnr2uaNM
Here's a video in which he says that a vision revealed that the power of the President has been suspended and that there will be arrests of people in multiple states, including Pennsylvania.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypaj-qIhuJA
Here's his video in which he said that shaking would occur within 30 days:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmYapyEr3Kg
Here is the video in which he talks about the signs featuring the rivers:
Q famously said "The only way is the military", which is often stated here as if it's definitively true. But Q has also said that disinformation is real and necessary.
What if "the only way is the military" is disinformation meant to fool the Deep State (get them worried about and focused on the military while the real threat to them comes from elsewhere)?
What if all of the military moves that we've seen (such as President Trump's DoD changes in the months after the election and the soldiers guarding the Capitol) are a massive diversion?
I believe that they didn't use evidence of election fraud or the Capitol event being a false-flag because it would have been enormously counterproductive.
Think about it. If fraud and/or the false-flag would have been made into part of the defense argument, the defense would essentially be backing the rats into a corner. And rats never fight back harder than when they are backed into a corner.
The choice would be A: vote not to convict, and thus tacitly admit that they're guilty of complicity in election fraud and/or a false-flag event, or B: vote to convict in order to keep up the facade of their innocence. You know which way they'd choose.
Thus, making election fraud and/or the false-flag part of the defense argument would have likely guaranteed that President Trump would get convicted.
Instead, the defense team didn't back the rats into a corner, and instead give them the chance to vote not to convict without tacitly admitting to the fraud or the false-flag. This much lowers the chance of conviction.
There are other, far more effective, opportunities to challenge the fraud (possibly before the Supreme Court or some other venue). But the correct strategy for the impeachment trial is "live to fight another day".
A lot of people won't trust information about the fraud from right-wing sources. But before the election, multiple left-wing sources like PBS made documentaries about how the voting machines were vulnerable to hacking and tampering. Politicians like Amy Klobuchar questioned the reliability of the machines. A politician in Georgia (I forget her name) was particularly vehement in her arguments against the machines.
But after the election, suddenly everything changed. Now the machines were 100% reliable, if the media and politicians were to be believed. PBS, Amy Klobuchar, the Georgia politician (who now famously said to Rudy Giuliani that evidence that had not even seen before was already "debunked"), etc, now suddenly viewed the idea that the machines might have been used to commit fraud as dangerous misinformation.
So if you want to redpill someone, start out by showing them the documentaries from left-wing sources like PBS about how the voting machines were easy to tamper with, videos and articles of left-wing politicians like Amy Klobuchar and the Georgia politician who complained that the machines were vulnerable, etc. Then, show them the things these same people said after the election for contrast, to demonstrate that they changed their position on a dime when it was no longer politically advantageous to them. From there on out, play it by ear, amping up the evidence according to what you think the particular person is now psychologically prepared for.
The comments section below would be a good place to compile any links you can dig up to left-wing documentaries, news articles, politicians, etc, who questioned the machines before the election and examples of what they said and did after the election. This compilation could then be spread around as a "redpill package" for people to use for their normie friends and family.
I've seen the term "color revolution" thrown around a lot (first by Lin Wood, then by many others), but I'm still having a hard time fully understanding the concept.
What I've been able to understand so far (which may be incorrect) is this:
A color revolution is a type of scheme to overthrow a government that was first used in certain Eastern European countries in the 1980s. It involves creating a contested election (I'm not sure whether this is always through the use of election fraud, or whether it sometimes involves other means), then somehow using this to instigate riots as a way to somehow allow a third party to step in and take over the government.
Is this correct? And if so, exactly how are the riots utilized in the grand scheme of the color revolution? Wouldn't it be easy for the country's armed forced to crush the riots? And how does this all cause a third party to take over?
Also, do you believe that the 2020 election fraud was a color revolution attempt like some (such as Lin Wood) have implied? If so, does this mean that the fraudsters actually wanted to be caught rather than successfully covering up their crimes, so the election would be contested? How would they have been able to use riots to allow a third party to take over? Would they only have been able to do this by riling up BLM and Antifa if President Trump had been able to defeat the fraud and stay in office? If so, does this mean that they actually wanted him to manage to stay in office so they could instigate the riots? Would the third party taking over have possibly been China or the U.N.?
On January 12, I was heavy of heart and prayed for God to send me a sign through whatever Bible passage I would read in order to give me peace.
I first opened it to a random page, but saw that it was one I had already recently read and bookmarked, so I turned it to another random page and started reading. It was in Ezekiel 22, and was about God deciding to allow Israel's destruction for its sins. I was starting to get even heavier of heart, thinking "Maybe it's a sign that this country is about to be handed over to its enemies like Israel was in Ezekiel's day." But then I got to verse 30:
And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none.
The verse struck me. Something about the idea of one man being able to hold off the destruction of a nation by standing before God on its behalf resonated with me. I looked the verse up on the Internet and saw to my shock that in most translations, the terminology used explicitly refers to building a wall (the "hedge" terminology in the KJV threw me off the track). Examples:
English Standard Version And I sought for a man among them who should build up the wall and stand in the breach before me for the land, that I should not destroy it, but I found none.
Berean Study Bible I searched for a man among them to repair the wall and stand in the gap before Me on behalf of the land, so that I should not destroy it. But I found no one.
Literal Standard Version And I seek from them a man making a wall, "" And standing in the breach before Me, "" In behalf of the land—not to destroy it, "" And I have found none.
NET Bible "I looked for a man from among them who would repair the wall and stand in the gap before me on behalf of the land, so that I would not destroy it, but I found no one.
New Heart English Bible "And I searched for a man among them who would build up the wall, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it; but I found none.
World English Bible I sought for a man among them, who should build up the wall, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it; but I found none.
Young's Literal Translation And I seek of them a man making a fence, And standing in the breach before Me, In behalf of the land -- not to destroy it, And I have not found.
I also found this article:
Question: "What does it mean to stand in the gap (Ezekiel 22:30)?"
Answer: In Ezekiel 22:30 the Lord says, “I looked for someone among them who would build up the wall and stand before me in the gap on behalf of the land so I would not have to destroy it, but I found no one.” The word picture painted in this verse is that of a wall with a hole or a gap in it. A wall was the best means of protection in ancient times. A breach in the wall would let the enemy through. If there was a breach in the wall, defenders would have to swarm to that location and hold the breach. The gap would need to be repaired as soon as possible. If a breach was left unattended or unrepaired, the city would fall.
Ezekiel 22 summarizes the sins and abuses of the nation. As punishment for Israel’s sins, God says He will disperse them among the nations. He says in verses 30–31, “I looked for someone among them who would build up the wall and stand before me in the gap on behalf of the land so I would not have to destroy it, but I found no one. So I will pour out my wrath on them and consume them with my fiery anger, bringing down on their own heads all they have done, declares the Sovereign Lord.” The “gap” here represents the danger facing Jerusalem: God’s wrath is about to break through in judgment on the sinful city. Was there no one who would, in righteousness, intercede on behalf of the city and seek God’s mercy? God searched for such a defender, but He could find none. It seems that, if someone had been willing to “stand in the gap,” the destruction of Jerusalem could have been avoided. Since no one was available or willing to defend the breach and rebuild the wall, judgment fell.
Similar wording is found in Psalm 106:23. This psalm summarizes the sins of Israel in the wilderness, primarily concerning the golden calf. Verse 23 explains, “So [God] said he would destroy them—had not Moses, his chosen one, stood in the breach before him to keep his wrath from destroying them.” Moses “stood in the gap” and saved the people of Israel with his petition on their behalf. In standing in the gap, he “stepped between the LORD and the people” (Psalm 106:23, NLT). Moses had been chosen for that very purpose.
The original story of Moses standing in the gap is found in Exodus 32:9–14: “‘I have seen these people,’ the Lord said to Moses, ‘and they are a stiff-necked people. Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them. Then I will make you into a great nation.’ But Moses sought the favor of the Lord his God. ‘Lord,’ he said, ‘why should your anger burn against your people, whom you brought out of Egypt with great power and a mighty hand? Why should the Egyptians say, “It was with evil intent that he brought them out, to kill them in the mountains and to wipe them off the face of the earth”? Turn from your fierce anger; relent and do not bring disaster on your people. Remember your servants Abraham, Isaac and Israel, to whom you swore by your own self: “I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and I will give your descendants all this land I promised them, and it will be their inheritance forever.”’ Then the Lord relented and did not bring on his people the disaster he had threatened.” To stand in the gap is to intercede and plead for God’s mercy.
In Ezekiel 22:30, God uses language that reminds the people of Moses’ actions centuries before. At Moses’ intercession, God had relented of His wrath in the wilderness. In Ezekiel’s day, there was no Moses. No one interceded for Israel. No one understood the danger God’s people were in. With no intercessor to stand in the gap, the destruction of Israel would be carried out.
To make matters worse, in Ezekiel 13, the false prophets in Israel are condemned because they had not repaired the breach in the wall. Instead of standing in the gap, they simply denied that judgment was going to come.
Besides Moses, there are several who have had the courage and insight to “stand in the gap” and intercede for others. In Genesis 18 Abraham intercedes for Sodom. Stephen prayed for those stoning him (Acts 7:60). Paul prayed for Israel’s salvation (Romans 10:1). And of course, the Lord Jesus is the master of standing in the gap, praying from the cross, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34), and continuing to intercede for us (Hebrews 7:25).
In the New Testament, we are told to pray for others (1 Timothy 2:1). In God’s wisdom and sovereignty, He has chosen to use the prayers of people to accomplish His will. He still seeks those who will stand in the gap for friends and family, for people groups and nations. Like Abraham and Moses, we should be willing to stand in the gap, asking God to spare and to save.
https://www.gotquestions.org/stand-in-the-gap.html
The day that this happened was Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - the day that President Trump went to the town of Alamo, Texas to visit the border wall (he even autographed it that day).
What are the statistical odds that the passage that I would randomly read after asking for a sign, during a predicament in which this nation stands at the brink of essentially being handed over to its enemies, would be one referring to God only allowing a country's destruction because He didn't find a man to build a wall and "stand in the gap" (convince Him that the nation still has the potential to repent and should be spared), and on that same day, a man known largely for having a wall built and who has been trying his best to prove that America can be "made great again" (a slogan which implies that the country has fallen and needs redemption - something the false prophets of Ezekiel's day never acknowledged) would be standing beside the wall that he had ordered built?
Maybe we now have what Israel didn't have in Ezekiel's day: a man who builds a wall and stands in the gap. Maybe, because of him, America won't be handed into the hands of its enemies. I hope and pray so.
To the mods: you have been (understandably) removing posts of prayers, Bible verses, etc, to keep them from clogging up the feed and getting in the way of relevant news posts. Could you please sticky this thread so anyone who wants to can post prayers, Bible verses, etc, all in one place in comments on this post? That would be the best of both worlds.
It's commonly assumed that "RED1: POTUS twitter removal" in Q drop 4414 refers to the banning of @RealDonaldTrump. But what if it specifically means the @POTUS account being fully taken down?
This is the thing that I most keep going back on forth on. Regardless of whether President Trump and/or Q have a plan, I don't have 100% faith in it. As Robert Burns put it, "the best laid schemes o' mice an' men gang aft a-gley".
Only God is undefeatable. I believe that God has intervened in my own life many times, usually in the form of small miracles that appear in the guise of coincidences too good to be true. Whenever I am in dire need of something, lo and behold, my need is met in an unexpected way out of the blue. This has happened many times. Some might call it coincidence, but it's too convenient and too frequent for that.
So I do believe in divine Providence. And at times, I think that I see signs of it in the events of the past four years regarding President Trump. The fact that he was elected against all odds and has helped expose so much of the evil surrounding us that most people were previously blind to makes me sometimes feel as though God has sent him to give America another chance at repentance and redemption.
Sometimes I see parallels between him and David (David was often outnumbered and/or outgunned by his enemies (starting with Goliath), yet always won in the end due to God being on his side and delivering him victory). In Goliath's case, David even got to finish him off with his own sword.
Also, I've never seen so many people praying or becoming more spiritual in my entire life as now. It's as if seeing evil revealed has driven many people fleeing from it and to God.
Yet at other times, I look at the way the Deep State has escalated its plans and redoubled its ferocity toward us due to Trump's presidency and the dire way that things look now due to how far the fraud has gotten without being overturned yet, and wonder if maybe God sent or allowed him to win in 2016 not to save America, but to hasten its downfall (by provoking the Deep State to escalate its plans) as punishment for this country's sins, or perhaps Trump's win was a fluke and God has turned His back on America for its sins.
But then I remember how many miracles were performed not at the most convenient time, but when things looked the most dire. The Red Sea didn't part until the Israelites thought they had nowhere to go (the Red Sea was in front of them, Pharaoh's chariots were rapidly closing in behind them, and mountains boxed them in on the left and right). Just when it looked like Haman would have Mortdecai hanged and all the Jews executed, the situation entirely reversed and Haman was hanged on his own gallows.
I go back and forth. Sometimes I feel one way, sometimes the other. As Q has stated, God always wins. But He doesn't always join in every fight. Sometimes He does (like the examples mentioned above). Sometimes, He lets nations fall once their cup of sin has run full. Sometimes, He grants them a chance to repent (like when He sent Jonah to Nineveh).
What do you believe? And what are your reasons for believing it?
