1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends what they're saying. Weird gatekeeping attitude imo.

2
Stylishman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah I see where the misunderstanding was, fairs. I agree. It doesn't mean its over. But Q has said to trust the plan and they are in control. If Biden gets inaugurated then that's thrown into serious question, as per my first post.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said I believe something will happen today. So, no, I dont. You said yourself that he wont be inaugurated and if he is then we lose. Thats how.

2
Stylishman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who said I was? I said I believe something will happen today. You're contradicting yourself. You said it yourself, if hes inaugurated = we lose... dont be a retard mate.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, I thought that you were saying that even if he's inaugurated, the plan is still in effect. Maybe I misunderstood ya, but I'm sure you can see how I did.

6
Stylishman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I do believe something will likely happen today, but how in the fuck can "the plan" involve giving back presidential control to people they know will abuse it? If thats the plan, then these people are also sick. Theres no logic there. "We want to take the globalists down so to do that lets get them seated comfortably back in power". No logical plan contains this.

4
Stylishman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah I dont see how "the plan" can account for "giving the dems presidential control again". Its one or the other at this point.

2
Stylishman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its just good-natured ribbing in 99% of cases. Chill.