Portugese version can be found here.
Two English versions, are here (summary) and here (full version, with highlights), pulled from Ehden's TG Channel.
A few points from the summary version (with some of my commentary):
Pfizer considered that the legal conditions in Brazil offered legal security to contract after Brazil has passed legislation # 14123 on March 10, 2021.
(Brazil changed its laws, such that Pfizer would feel legally safe having a contract with them).
Brazil called some of the clauses in the contract leonine clauses. A leonine clause is a contractual device established unilaterally by one party to the contract that prejudices the rights of the other party, usually by taking advantage of an asymmetric situation in the negotiation.
There were three legal clauses that Brazil considered incompatible with Brazilian law:
- Imposition of the pharmaceutical company - that Brazil had values in an account abroad, of Pfizer, as a guarantee of payment, in the so-called pre-purchase;
- that any contractual issue would be judged in a court in New York, in the United States; and
- that the Brazilian State would assume responsibility for any possible side effects of the vaccine.
During the negotiation the legislation did not allow the signing of the contract with the clauses imposed under these conditions. That is why the Federal Senate and the Brazilian Congress had to approve legislation allowing the Government to sign this contract with Pfizer.
(Pfizer contract disputes are to be handled in New York. Strange.)
(And the Brazilian Congress & Senate took care of these legal hurdles later on, read further in the document).
Brazil bought some vaccines without even having the emergency authorization by the Brazilian agency, Anvisa (On January 6, 2021).
(That's curious. Were any of them used prior to the EUA?)
Pfizer was working on reaching a capacity of 3 billion vaccine dosages by the end of 2021.
(Considering that Pfizer announced their jabs post-US-2020-election, that seems like quite the task. A year for 3 billion products?).
Murillo confirmed supply delays are natural, and claim he does not know if the contractual conditions allow a country (e.g. Italy) has the right to sue Pfizer for delays (EHDEN’S COMMENT – ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT YOU CANNOT SUE PFIZER FOR SUPPLY DELAYS). When asked directly, “Do these delays mean a violation to the population's health in Pfizer's evaluation?” Murillo’s response was “I could not answer this question objectively to you.”
(Pfizer is not legally responsible for any delay in vaccine deliveries, regardless of their contract due dates.)
According to Murillo’s understanding the adverse events reported associated with the vaccine are the same as those that have been proven in the initial clinical trial.
(The CEO Of Pfizer Latin America supposedly believes that the jabs are proving to be "just as safe" as in their clinical trials).
A ~20 minute video, breaking down why the jabs have only a ~0-1% effectiveness of preventing death from COVID-19.
Dr. Richard Fleming does the breakdown for each of Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J (Jansen).
Not for AstraZeneca, though, he shows the final numbers of that in one of the slides.
Clipped from two segments of a late-June 2021 video (the two segments are joined at ~14 mins in):
https://files.catbox.moe/es1st4.mp4
The full video is here (and on a few other platforms).
- 2013: 1
- 2014: 0
- 2015: 1
- 2016: 2
- 2017: 28
- 2018: 1
- 2019: 1
- 2020: 6
- 2021: 111 (in first 9 months)
As an aside, for anyone wondering, within first 9 months of 2021, the breakdown is supposedly:
- Jan: 1
- Feb: 3
- Mar: 1
- April: 3
- May: 2
- June: 5
- July: 38
- Aug: 33
- Sept: 21
Passing thought I had yesterday.
One of my uncles was in an accident many years ago, which resulted in him losing his spleen.
As such, he was immunocompromised.
If you were sick with something rather minor (like a cold or flu), then he had to avoid being around you, as it could be rather serious for him.
If ADE for the jabbed turns out to be as bad as some fear, then I wonder if this will eventually be the situation for many of us with friends/family who got jabbed.
Maybe not to the same extreme as with my spleen-less uncle, though, I suppose that would depend on a few factors, such as: (1) how many doses they had, (2) how serious the ADE is, (3) if the jabbed realize they're the ones at risk to ADE (and aren't taking things like Ivermectin to mitigate the risk).
It recently occured to me, after reading this thread, that I may have been thinking about the smears of Ivermectin a bit too generously.
Obviously they don't want their narrative to collapse, they want the lockdowns to continue, they want the third/fourth/fifth jab rollouts, and they want the vaxx passports (to branch into social credit scores, and to try to push us out of society). Ivermectin puts a stop to all of this.
I've been assuming that any deaths they cause in the meantime, from their perspective, is an added bonus. Not the intended goal of their short-to-midterm plans.
With that said, they want de-pop, either by the jabs and/or at a later time by other means (which of these would become obvious with time, provided their plans aren't stopped).
There is an argument for why significant depop-by-jab isn't a good route for them to go down, yet, given they don't have full control yet and it has the potential to awaken the population against them before they can achieve their goals.
Given that Ivermectin would significantly reduce the rate of ADE amongst our jabbed population, it was thus reduce the rate of death and severe injury amongst our people.
These deaths, if allowed to occur (via the continued supression of Ivermectin and other treatments), would be spun as being the fault of the unvaxxed, for "producing the variants", and used as the "justification" for vaxx passports and further booster shots.
So perhaps there is another reason for the smears of Ivermectin. Perhaps they do want many of our vaxxed people to die, sooner-rather-than-later, to advance their current goals (i.e., they're timeline is being rushed).
This is a continuation of this list, with additional media outlets pulled from here, here, here, among others which I have stumbled onto through this forum, FreeCanada, and a few other forums.
Here's the listing:
- The Lotus Eaters (UK, Sargon Of Akkad/Carl Benjamin)
- Rebel News (Canadian)
- Right Side Broadcasting Network (for rallies)
- Agenda Weekly (US, anti-communist, Curtis Bowers, $5/month sub, provides a summary of important stories & videos to read each week, and, his weekly videos are posted to YouTube but sometimes pulled off by YT)
- The Fleming Method (COVID-19 & vaccine science)
- The Tom Woods Show (US, Libertarian, anti-lockdown)
- True North (Canadian)
- New Discourses (James Lindsay, anti-woke/culture war, free roughly weekly podcast, and a $5/month OnlySub podcast which has 2-3 good & shorter episodes a week)
- Info Wars (Alex Jones, and yes, I'm aware that not everyone here likes him)
- Western Standard (Canadian)
- Spencer Fernando (Canadian)
- Liberty Talk with Odessa Orlewicz (Canadian, anti-lockdown, anti-Great Reset, shares supporting material on her Facebook page, and has a Canadian free speech platform with her husband called Libriti)
- Canada Free Press (Canadian & US)
- Justice Centre (Canadian)
- Summit News (Paul Joseph Watson's organization)
- Sharyl Attkisson (US investigative journalist)
- Canuck Law (Canadian)
- Mercola (all new content deleted after 48 hours)
Some which I'm less sure of:
- Blacklock's Reporter (Canadian)
- Diverge Media (Canadian)
- National Vaccine Information Center
- Millions Against Medical Mandates (MAMM)
- Breaking News (Canadian)
- Live Action (pro-life)
- Patriot Daily Press (with two mirror links here and here)
- The Post Millennial (Canadian)
- American Institute For Economic Research (AIER)
- Ruptly (international)
- The RF Angle (might be down, the last article was late-July 2021)
Note that I may have missed a handful which I've come across in the past. Please do add any other good ones I've missed into the comment section.
Also note that I've tried to stick mostly with ones which are fairly frequently shared among right-wingers, and, have quickly vetted the ones I was less familiar with. As such, I cannot vouch specifically for all, so please do point out any that tend to actually post plenty of "fake news".
Does anyone happen to have it on hand?
It was multiple words (in English and Chinese) which were meant to give CCP shills a hard time for reading them. Such as "Tiananmen Square".
Two of the previous mods, who are no longer on GAW, used to have them available, as I recall.
See thread title. The person had worded it nicely, as I remember. Something like "holding out on the jabs is like the GME squeeze, x1000."
A thought on the third booster.
They're "logic" of the third booster is it will supposedly protect against the delta variant (it won't), which is said to have mutated enough to bypass the original doses.
Okay, let's say we grant them that (false) premise.
Why aren't we also then hearing about the booster working for lambda as well? Or delta plus?
Either I have a blindspot and just missed it, or, it's one hell of an oversight (likely intentional).
So, let's say someone gets tripped jabbed ... and then "enough" of the population does ... then bam, new narrative ... the lambda bypasses your triple jab. Time for a fourth.
How can people not see this?
Recently, we were told by CodeMonkey that there would be a big data release, and that we all ought to access said information, in a manner that would protect us. There were a few pinned threads here to that effect (i.e., trying to teach people how to safely use torrents and whatnot).
Today, at the symposium, Mike said something to the effect of "we were going through all of the data that recently came in, it was a wave of anxiety, ups and downs, until about half way through we made a big discovery". As I understood it, this big discovery was what was supposed to be the "big drop" on the first day of the symposium, at 7 PM.
It didn't seem to me that we got a big drop. We ended up getting the lady from Colorado in its place.
Now, we are hearing that CodeMonkey will be at the symposium.
Could it be that the "big drop" comes from the data that CodeMonkey was meaning for all of us to download and thus decentralize? And that he first gave it to Mike and his team to go through?
Edit:
Just catching up on some older threads from today. This one is relevant to the above theory.
Edit #2:
During the symposium, a few times the guests kept saying that Dominion/fraud whistler blowers should come forward. Maybe priming for the big drop.
Let's say we grant the sheep a bunch of their false premises, like, (1) it is the unvaxxed generating most or all of the variants, (2) it is the variants that are bypassing the jabs, and (3) that the vaccines are 90-95% effective.
Now, let's say an unvaxxed person loses their sanity/will to resist, and decides to get jabbed.
Making a few assumptions, which I've tried to quickly verify (but haven't had much luck of yet):
- you would still need three jabs to be "protected" against the Delta scariant
- it is the third dose, and the third dose alone, which is "highly effective" against the Delta variant, and, you cannot skip to the third dose without having the previous two jabs
What we know is that each jab requires some period of time between them. I'm not sure exactly how long this is (as I recall, they 'accelerated' it at some point), something like 4-8 weeks.
And it takes a few weeks after the last jab for the set of jabs to have altered your immune system enough for the jab to be "effective".
So, let's now say that everyone who is unvaxxed collectively loses their minds, and decides to get jabbed, ASAP. The tyrants snap their fingers, and it is magically done. A great forgetting (or forceful coercion) of sorts.
And let's say that this is an efficient process, that they can get people jabbed right away, without much delay (logistically speaking, this seems rather unlikely, to say the least).
Someone who actually believes the narrative, would call this a "best case scenario".
Even under these conditions, with no one resisting the jab and the jab roll-out going smoothly ... By the time that everyone who is unvaxxed gets their third dose, a few months would have passed prior to them being "immune" to the Delta variant.
In that time frame, tonnes of new variants could have spawned, and, circling back to their original false premise #2, a fourth jab would be needed for these new variants. We've already heard talk of a Lambda and Delta Plus variant, for instance.
As such, even in their "best case" scenario (and granting them a bunch of their false premises), the jab roll-out still fails.
You will forever be playing catch up to the new variants. The lockdowns will continue. It will never end.
This is the logical conclusion of their current arguments, even while granting their false premises.
(This argument breaks down a bit if you can get the "Delta variant" booster as your second jab instead of "needing" a third dose, but even so, there is still enough of a time gap that new variants would form).
A while back I seen a map of the potential fallout from the Three Gorges Dam collapsing. It marked the regions of the which were likely to be effected, and, the corresponding populations of each region.
The number of potential deaths was huge, in the hundreds of thousands or millions.
I've since tried to find that map again, without much luck yet.
I did find three similar maps, but they aren't the same ones. Two from Reddit, here and here, and one from another website, here. The last of these three is the closest to the one I had previously seen, though, of much lower quality. The first two are higher quality, but, without populations written down.
Does anyone happen to have a map like the one which I have described above?
Edit:
Found it. Backed up here. Not sure if it is an accurate figure, and wasn't as high quality as I remembered.