I've got 1 percent left on my phone, so at the last minute I'm saying hello, because I like y'all (even if I'm not a follower/convert).

But while I'm here, I'll take any flak you got -- I won't argue or go into lib disproving mode. I saw the leftist AMA the other day and left disappointed, so I just thought I'd take the temperature of the board a little, from my nonthreatening obvious interloper account.

(And if I don't respond, it's because my phone died and I'll be back later, charged.)

Frustrated, furious, anxious, excited, cool as a cucumber -- How are you?

I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?

For me, its this:

No coincidences

I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.

Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?