So you think a 90% homeownership rate is bad and should be avoided?
You would rather landlords own 35% (soon to be 50%) of the housing market?
It makes real estate available for those who don't have any. Land is a limited resource and should be managed.
You are just proving my point. You arent allowed to discuss this policy anywhere online.
What system would you sugguest?
Check the OP, lol
The constitution says nothing about this. Government determines property ownership, so of course it is within their power and oversight.
Arent you guys always talking about revolution and how bad things are? What is wrong with you?
You could accomplish this with probably 10 lines of computer code.
Have some nuance. Not everything is black and white.
People surviving is more important than your return on investment. You can invest in something else.
<3 lol
China has 1 max for foreigners and 2 max for citizens.
Corporations can own zero.
You think "wrong-think" punishments are bad now, wait until it carries the death penalty!
Where did you get this outcome? Why would this be the case?
Surely it couldnt be worse than the demonic society we have now! Right?
You see the reasoning in the policy though yes? To prevent people like bill gates from buying 250,000+ acres and hurting the agriculture market with it. Pushing land values up, reducing land availability?
Why dont you worry about these issues instead?
"Had nothing to do with Blackrock, although they or someone like them would be first in line to gobble up those excess properties you force to auction."
They cant, that is the point.
And we could allow up to 6 plots per farmer. Why not.
You are willing to die to protect the profits of blackrock and CEOs? Weird, man.
I will, thanks! I know people are willing to die to PREVENT this list from happening, lmfao. A mad world.
Look at homelessness, the cost of living crisis, WW3, the war on terror, etc. Congress has failed. Elections have achieved no progress.
This is raw uncensored populism. It isnt globohomo at all.
Q is all about a military takeover of congress. It is what this country desperately needs. Elections have failed. Democracy has failed.
Confiscation of property would seem to conflict with that.
No it wouldn't. It is the confiscation of EXCESS property.
And what if I refuse to surrender my third parcel of land, or my second story apartment to the benevolent state? Will you send men with guns to execute me if I don't comply? Won't that violate my human rights?
Here is the beauty of the situation. We merely need to switch ownership of the property in the property database. Then you lose all legal rights over said property.
Palantir gathers intelligence to make mass assassinations easier.....and if you dont think they are also spying domestically to mass assassinate US citizens, then you are a dumb fool.