"Clearly"... Thats actually not clear at all. It could be that he or she is schizophrenic and none of that happened. Im not saying that to be mean, but thats how that sounds. Ive dealt with schizophrenic people who think the government put nano tracking devices in the water supply and secret agents follow them around all day photographing their activities (at the homeless shelter even!) and far far crazier shit, and they NEVER have just one delusion, its always layers of them and they truly believe its all real. I worked with dozens and dozens of people like this, and thats what i think we are looking at here. If you want to give it more credence you go right ahead, im just giving my opinion.
Yes. Part of the fight. Do I agree with her on everything? Obviously not. Furthermore.. Are you aware that her participation in WEF was as an award recipient from YGL, in 2015... As in.. They tapped her to be a future leader. Its not something that funded her or that she asked for.... And then she began getting lippy with her own party and they came at her to destroy her reputation, a party that she literally quit?
Wait let me guess... You never looked into it that far.
Fact, she called Brennan and Schiff and big tech the bigger threat. They'll come after her for this. As in the FBICIADNC. You know it, and whether or not you agree with her on other issues is irrelevant.
Yes yes, we've all seen it. Edit: WEF is bad, Soros is bad. We are clear on that yeah? Ok, lets move on to present day reality. Her bio on there doesnt mean SHE is directly Soros funded. It means that at one point (but not anymore) she took part in WEF and now they use her photo to boost their own cred. Could it potentially mean more? Sure. Could it potentially mean jack shit now that she literally QUIT the democrat party and went scorched earth on some of their sacred cows? Its a possibility, and if youre acting like you KNOW either way, youre lying.
Is there some proof thats Q?
Not everything is as it seems, and some things are exactly as they [SEEM] -Q