1
mmtwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK -on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts MIL security.
11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.) 11.9.2.2 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example), specifically calling out of suffrage

1
mmtwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

However, it further explains (and the footnote adds clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.

The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution

1
mmtwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to 11.1.3 and 11.1.3.2, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.

1
mmtwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of importance: My read of the usage of the term ‘belligerent’ in LoW refers to a party actively in conflict on either side. In this case, belligerent occupation refers to one party’s occupation of another party’s territory during a conflict. It doesn’t mean the aggressive asshole in a particular situation.

Additionally, due to poor optics, I think MIL would be reluctant to use all the powers described in this manual.

The breadth of these powers, however, is NOTABLE.

2
mmtwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. Here’s a screencap of the chapter outline.

3
mmtwo 3 points ago +3 / -0

On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the their very first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the LoW. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist.

I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental.

4
mmtwo 4 points ago +4 / -0

kek- it takes awhile. then you get used to it. for me thats when it started to be like reading anything.it gets easier .

8
mmtwo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pieces being moved.but it's still difficult to see the move.I wonder how long he has known this about Ron? Is it new to him or known for awhile waiting for the right time? Timing is everything!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›