Hear me out-

With Tucker leaving the network today FOX News just lost by far their biggest star. Why would Tucker walk away and why would FOX let him?

If I were to venture a guess, it's because Tucker never wanted FOX to settle that Dominion suit. Not only does it provide a layer of legitimacy to the vote rigging bs ("Dominion isn't stealing elections, they sued FOX and won" etc) but FOX was entitled to a certain level of discovery as being the sued party in the lawsuit. If their attorneys REALLY wanted to get some answers and dig into the information, they could have. But their lawyers never were working for FOX.

Tucker posted something a few days ago about a story he did on cows, and then FOX News did a story on it, and Tucker (or someone on his team) said "we were on this story first" with a link to their own reporting on it.

When I saw that I immediately thought that Tucker was sending some kind of message to FOX, this was after the Dominion suit. Throw in Tucker's last episode where he says "we'll be back" while eating pizza with the pizza delivery guy for more tells.

I'm willing to bet that Tucker had a story lined up (real news, not FOX RINO messaging) that his superiors were deathly afraid he would air. And instead of giving him this week to drop it, they got ahead of it and basically burned their own house down in the process.

So why would FOX just give Dominion hundreds of millions without even using any lawfare and why would they not only let the golden goose get away, but tell the golden goose to leave?

Whoever's in control at FOX isn't really in control, are they.

For the folks who want a deeper understanding surrounding CodeMonkey's video or recent comments, it really is this simple.

Election machines and local servers are supposed to be a "closed" system - no outside network access. This ensures that nobody can hack in or intercept data and it was part of the basic requirements for the move to electronic voting machines - they have to be secured against network snooping/hacking/intrusion.

At first people thought hey, someone is directly hacking into these machines to change vote totals, so we need access to the machines.

But by booting from a NETWORK device, and not the local hard drive, it provides them perfect deniability - they can say "Oh, our machines are switching votes? Reboot the local counting station and try again." And then they would simply toggle one setting in the BIOS (a web-enabled BIOS would be so easy to do this with) to get the machine to boot from the local hard drive, not the network boot device.

If they have a way to force a network boot, they also have a way to push an image with their fraudulent/fake vote totals down to the local workstation. Think of it like this:

Person turns on voting machine. It talks to "home base" according to BIOS settings - BIOS says network boot The machine looks like it normally does, but it's actually just a "terminal server" or "remote desktop" view of another machine. I would imagine any area experiencing high fraud totals was rebooted before election day, and pointed toward this "remote desktop" view and wasn't actually loading from the hard drive Then they have their fake voting day, the fixers determine how many votes they need to take away from Trump and give to Biden to win, they establish that in the "remote desktop" session which is going to some server somewhere in the world, and then they create an image after they have all the votes they need. They tell election workers to reboot, or just pack up the devices, and the next time someone turns them on, they boot to the hard drive, and the hard drive had an image pushed to it from the remote server, to reflect the "fixed" vote totals, thus being perfectly in line with reported results.

So there is no trail to find out what REALLY happened on voting night except to have the routers, which would contain:

How much traffic passed between internal and external IP addresses Which IP addresses housed the remote server where the fraud took place If using a VPN, the username/password to access the VPN If a device connected to the router to get an IP address or get DNS info, that device WAS online, even if the online option is unchecked on that machine, you can match this based on MAC addresses

This is why they are desperate to hide the routers, and willing to go to jail rather than reveal passwords to access the routers. This is why the audit people NEED the routers.

They only have half of the picture - the laundered/fake ballots that were "backfilled" after the vote fixers determined how many to destroy from Trump's pile, and how many to print and add to Biden's pile. They can forensically determine which ballots are fake based on watermarks and obvious copies, but they cannot determine how many Trump ballots were destroyed and they cannot determine what the actual vote count was on election night to reconcile against the physical ballots they have.

And if a machine wasn't connected to the hive vote-fixing main server, a Dominion tech could use a USB drive to take the needed -Trump and +Biden figures from the remote server and overwrite the local Trump and Biden figures on all local machines.

The ONLY place the actual votes came into on election night were remote servers not the actual voting machines themselves.

If they get the IP addresses of the remote servers, they will find the hardware they really need to complete the audit - the machine that recorded the actual votes.

The machine that recorded them was not physically at the voting precincts.

It could have been in China or Italy and if I were Dominion I would make sure those IPs were outside the US, so I could pretend "we were hacked" and add another layer of plausible deniability.

And also to insulate myself against charges of treason.

You will see the floodgates open with evidence and proof of all of this election fraud if any entity anywhere in the US can obtain access to routers used on election night that haven't been flashed or factory reset.

But we are so far down the road on this, our best chance to get one will likely be on election night of the 2022 elections.

It's my opinion after reading all of this that the reason Trump won on election night in 2016 was because the military or some other group DDOS'd or shut down the IP addresses of the remote vote-flipping servers, and the Dominion machines had no choice but to boot from local hard drives.

And it also seems that there are several key/strategic areas which engage in perpetual algorithmic vote-flipping and by doing it in a large urban area with a high enough population, you can pick who wins and loses elections statewide if you destroy enough Trump votes and create enough Biden votes.

They don't need control of the state board of elections, all they need is control of the board of supervisors or commissioners in the area with the most voters. Like Maricopa County.

HELL NO.

Nobody conceded in Bush v Gore until 36 days after the election.

We are on day 71 and Trump still has not conceded.

Do the math on that. First time in history since presidents started the tradition of conceding that a sitting president has not conceded beyond 36 days and he is STILL going. Let that put some wind in your sails.