1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just saw your comment.

  1. Never saw a reason to doubt JK identity until your comment. In my gnostic view, JK and Trump are working together, although I expect a rift in the middle of the story?
  2. JA - that's amazing, never thought of all. Nothing would surprise me these days. And you're RIGHT about the resemblance.
  3. Interesting.
  4. Melania is a dude. Watch the wives. The fact that Melania is just a really good looking tranny is one of the biggest reasons to think that they're all in on it.

Thanks for the great comment.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

You win a point and lose a point.

As for murder/kill: it looks like you're right. Touche.

As for Genesis 1:28: that entire chapter is about Elohim. It doesn't use the word YHWH. He comes later in Genesis 2.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

The commandment says nothing about animals vs. humans. It just says don't kill.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. I have no idea because when I challenge you with questions, you retreat and act mysterious and say you don't need to answer them. The impression everyone gets is that you don't have good answers. And if I sound condescending, imagine how you sound with your know-it-all can't be wrong interpretation of the Bible.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

I honestly think you don't know the answers, or else you would share them. I don't want to condescend to you, so I hope you will just trust me: the world and the Bible are 1000x weirder and more complicated than whatever you were taught in Sunday school. All the best to you.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are multiple names, in Hebrew and Greek, for characters claiming to be God:

YHWH Elohim (plural of El) El El Elyon Adonai Shaddai Theos Kyrios Abba Pater Satan

Are you sure that all of these are the same character? Which ones are the same? Which ones are different?

Satan claims to be God, is Satan lying?

YHWH claims to be God, is YHWH lying?

Does Yeshua ever call YHWH Father?

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

The viewpoint I am advocating agrees with you that Jesus is Christ and the kinsman redeemer. So I'm not sure what you're arguing about.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm reading the original Hebrew. It uses two different multiple different words for God, including Elohim (Genesis 1) and YHWH (Genesis 2). Notice that the first two chapters of Genesis essentially repeat each other, but use different words for God/Creator. That's your first clue that something is off and there isn't a single character in the story.

It's not your fault that you've interpreted the Bible this way - most Christians have for thousands of years. But once you realize the different characters in the original Hebrew, you can't unsee it, and it makes the Bible make 1000x more sense than otherwise.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

The creator of this world is evil.

According to Genesis, there is a firmament that separates the water above from the world below. YHWH created the world below the water and below the firmament.

Who created the world above us? The meta-level world? The higher-level world? That's the higher-level God, corresponding to Jesus. Jesus calls him Abba or Pater. He never calls him YHWH.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Odd to pray to the little horn, but everything about gnosticism is weird.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have all the answers. But I'm deeply suspicious of someone who commands me not to kill when I'm designed to eat living things that were killed. My creator could have put a solar panel on my back. Instead I eat hamburger. Someone upstairs is having a good laugh about that.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

A little odd to pray to the little horn, but gnosticism is super weird anyway.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we're on the same wavelength. But I bristle at the kneejerk reaction that we can't be in the End TImes. Not just a course correction, but the final correction before the next flood/cycle. The confidence that we just can't, can't, can't be in the End Times conflicts with everything apocalyptic Jesus said about it being imminent and unpredictable.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know anything about that. My suspicion about the vaccine is that elites created them to increase IQ in certain individuals, even at great harm or cost to millions, trying to fish out the Antichrist or Moschiach or whatever (the Jewish religion is very complex and mysterious and I don't understand a lot of it). In other words, the vaccine causes autism - this well known - and autism increases intelligence and functioning in some vectors but hurts in others - and nobody seems to have linked those two facts together to give a more defensible explanation for why the elites push the vax.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus is referring to YHWH in John 8:44. Don't take my word for it, read The Evil Creator by Litwa. He has a Patreon if you want to learn more.

2
party1981 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fascinating thoughts. I think a lot of QM stuff is pseudoscience mysticism, but people smarter than me say there is a lot of truth there. I have no idea, it's above my paygrade.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's definitely heretical in the sense that it's contradicted by Christian orthodoxy. Which one is correct, between the heresy and the orthodoxy, is a fascinating question.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, my favorite comment. And you actually answered the question.

  1. That actually makes sense. My wrinkle is... AI doesn't really have preferences or feelings (yet?). Right now, it's more like a tool than a personality.
  2. I'm starting to think it's a double conspiracy. First you think nukes are real. Then Rogan and others show you the fake footage indicating they are fake. Then Wikileaks blames 9/11 on Israel, Israel invokes the Samson option, and Manhattan turns into glass. But who knows? I like the ending where no nukes go off.
  3. I think X is the mark of the beast. It's also a reference to the X chromosome - meaning everyone has the mark of the beast. Just my two cents. Not sure what will happen with Musk - it's hard to imagine that we get "space is fake" level of disclosure, but all bets are off at this point.
  4. I'm pretty sure that the Accords are the fake peace of Revelation.
  5. We're on the same wavelength.

Thanks!

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

As long as you can't explain the anti-mason Q drops, nobody cares about your personal view.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for sharing your confidence. Since you have no explanation for why Q is attacking masons, your input means very little to me.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then your NASA analogy doesn't make any sense.

2
party1981 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump entrapped his enemies - Cheney, Israel, and Blackrock.

He either created the assassination attempt and sold it to his enemies, including getting NATO sponsorship.

Or he intercepted it and let it go through, but in a way that kept him safe the entire way.

The people who "died" in the crowd probably faked their death as part of this operation. That sounds outrageous, but it will makes more sense when Trump reveals that Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon involved fake deaths. He used his opponents' own tricks against them.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

By your analogy, you've heard high level masons talk about crimes or bad rituals?

You lost me and I'm losing interest in the debate.

1
party1981 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is that, on a Q forum, nobody really cares about your lowel-mid (whatever) level personal experiences, which nobody can verify. All we know is what Q wrote.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›