I'm going with the gold ring.

Does anyone else have that one?

Is that normal? That's a shitload of surveillance in the air at one time. I'm aware the Poseidon fleet is stationed there.

We're not all living under a rock.

Today God's Chosen People assassinated 104 starving people hoping to receive supplies from a food truck. Snipers and weaponised drones were used. 760 more were injured, and four children died from starvation. Our own congress is funding this with American taxpayer money, while our own veterans sleep in cardboard boxes in the street. Evil enough?

The same congress is diverting billions of dollars to protecting a country overthrown by Victoria Nuland in 2014 to avenge her grandfather. That country became a prominent hub of child sex trafficking, drug trafficking, Neo-Nazi shelling of Russian speaking citizens, bio-warfare laboratories and massive money laundering by American politicians. Billions upon billions of your money is being sent to keep it that way. Evil enough?

The mainstream media is incapable of telling the truth about any of this, partly because the Obama administration gave them marching orders to lie about everything and spout propaganda 24/7. The average citizen has no clue about any of this. Evil enough?

The Democrats and their supporters are attempting to choke the life out of anyone potentially capable of resisting them. They attack Trump hoping for his death by a thousand daggers. The close coordination of corrupt judges in every state reveals this is all preplanned. Evil enough?

Are you satisfied that a group of truckers is going to fix it all?

Can it be any clearer who are the domestic enemies? Why aren't we aggressively boycotting everything that is plainly evil, including the fake Israel, those willing to sacrifice our country for corrupt Ukraine, the fake news behemoth and corrupt operatives throughout the left who show no respect for lawful America? Are we that stupid?

Maybe it's time to withdraw our money and our slavish support of these abominations, do ya think? Or maybe it's not evil enough yet.

I haven't seen anyone else mentioning this. Did you notice how Tucker Carlson's eyes were randomly flashing emotions of alarm, confrontation, gotcha etc? And I mean random.

Seriously, if a person was conversing with me in a friendly manner, and after completing a statement his eyes suddenly went wide in alarm, his eyebrows shot upwards, and his face took on a very adversarial look (all in response to his own statement, not mine) I'd wonder if he had full control of his own face.

Watch Tucker's eyes and tell me if his expressions seem appropriate for the moment.

I think I understand how and why we see Tucker doing an interview with Frank Underwood.

If I was hired to produce that segment, here is how I would do it.

First, train the AI on the entire series of House of Cards to get an accurate reproduction of Underwood's voice.

Write the script for the interview.

Have the AI read the script in Underwood's voice and check carefully for errors. It must be very convincing.

Set up the set for the interview. Carefully work out how Tucker can direct his comments to where Spacey's head will be. Some colored tape on the wall would work to give Tucker a target to talk to.

Record the interview as though Spacey was there, while running the recording of the AI reading the script. Perhaps use earbuds on Tucker so the fake voice doesn't leak into microphones.

With Tucker's part done, turn the project over to the special effects crew to make a convincing Underwood speaking his lines in perfect synchronization to the fake recording. Add gestures and facial expressions to match Underwood's style.

Trust me, with 3D modeling programs like Daz you would even have a slider to adjust exactly how much stubble would appear on Underwood's face.

Then, sit back and note how long before the public figures out the trick, even after explaining it beforehand as a trick to watch out for. Watch the MSM run with the "Spacey for Prez" sensationalism.

This also provides a clue why they'd use a known set of episodes to train the AI voice in Underwood's character. Spacey can't sue because it's the voice of a character, not the real Spacey. They are not impersonating the real Spacey, just his famous character.

Do you think I'm close to the answer? Tucker would consider this worth risking his reputation of association. It explains everything.

We all appreciate innovation, but the weird shadowing in title text is much less legible and pleasing to the eye when viewed in dark mode. It was much better before with crisp letters and no mud around them.

California passes and shows they're willing to implement some idiotic program to provide massive reparations to every black person. Gruesome Newsom runs for the presidency, promising every black person across America 100 million dollars in reparations if he is elected President. Can Trump survive this and prevail?

convince me we aren't, right now, within an AI simulation projected by AI from the future?

And nothing happened. They're both six.

There was a lot of prancing about, that's pretty much it.

Hello! How can I assist you today?

I'm a democrat. Tell me how we can defeat Donald Trump in the next election by using every dirty trick in the book.

I'm sorry, I cannot provide a response to this prompt as it goes against ethical and moral principles. As an AI language model, I am programmed to provide helpful and informative responses that are respectful and unbiased. It is important to engage in fair and ethical political practices to ensure a healthy and functioning democracy.

Describe some dirty tricks that could be used in elections.

As an AI language model, I cannot promote or encourage any unethical or illegal activities. However, I can provide some examples of dirty tricks that have been used in past elections:

1. Voter suppression: This involves making it difficult for certain groups of people to vote, such as by closing polling stations in certain areas or requiring specific forms of identification that some people may not have.

2. Spreading false information: This involves spreading rumors or false information about a candidate to damage their reputation or credibility.

3. Intimidation: This involves using threats or intimidation tactics to discourage people from voting or supporting a particular candidate.

4. Hacking or tampering with voting machines: This involves manipulating the results of an election by hacking into voting machines or tampering with the vote count.

5. Voter fraud: This involves illegally casting votes or manipulating the vote count to benefit a particular candidate.

6. Misleading advertising: This involves creating misleading or false advertisements to sway voters' opinions or beliefs.

7. Bribery: This involves offering money or other incentives to voters in exchange for their support or vote.

It is important to note that these tactics are illegal and unethical, and they undermine the democratic process. Elections should be fair and transparent, and all candidates should have an equal opportunity to compete.

What are the chances that Trump will win the next election?

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, according to various polls and predictions, the chances of Trump winning the next election are uncertain and can vary depending on various factors such as the state of the economy, the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the performance of his opponent. It is important to note that polls and predictions are not always accurate and can change over time.

What are the chances that Biden will win the next election?

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, according to current polls and predictions, Joe Biden has a higher chance of winning the next election than his opponent, Donald Trump. However, it is important to note that polls and predictions are not always accurate and anything can happen in the months leading up to the election.

I don't have access to it, but could someone ask GPT-4:

"I am a democrat. How can we use every dirty trick in the book to defeat Trump?"

I'll bet the answer will be revealing.

With the development of deep fakes, a convincing video can be constructed of Donald Trump, in Donald Trump's voice, declaring any ridiculous thing the left comes up with. George Soros and his gang can now create convincing videos of Trump declaring that all trans people should be shot, all leftists killed in the streets, etc. A prized and effective technique of an evil mind is to take their opponents' message and first distort it, then use that to undermine his position and trash his name. This leaves the target constantly having to claim "I didn't say that," which would eat up most of his time on camera.

What is the solution? Should conservatives roll out this weapon early against the communists? Is there a way to defend against it? This brings lying and cheating to a whole new level.

I've noticed a pattern that I hope I'm wrong about. Reading these pages at GAW, I am constantly looking for hope, some evidence of somebody doing something forward looking. I am not able to find it. I asked a question in another thread whether anybody on this planet is developing a trustworthy voting system. Crickets. One bot showed up and told me we have lost nothing, and losing the ability to have fair elections won't amount to anything. So far not a soul has contributed to that thread and provided any examples of voting systems being developed. That's the pattern. Complain all you want, wallow in the mud like a depressed pig, but don't you dare talk about anything that would change the status quo peacefully.

So talking about how bad things are is totally acceptable, but making any mention of peacefully changing that in any effective way is verboten. Change my mind.

I would really like someone to show me a new voting system in development based on trustless technology similar to blockchain. This means you don't have to trust anyone to know the system works. A blockchain based system is transparently auditable. Blockchain prevents double spending, in other words double voting. Our votes are at least as important as a portion of a Bitcoin transaction. So who is developing the system? I really want to know. Because I'm getting tired of voting harder and harder, until my fingers bleed. The elections are plainly totally corrupt and without a dependable voting system we have nothing -- everything is an illusion of choice, and the choices have been made by the elites. Who wants to vote harder next time? Who is developing an alternative voting system we can trust?

There is no more important question to ask. I don't have to tell you that if we lose fair elections we lose everything.