I think I understand how and why we see Tucker doing an interview with Frank Underwood.
If I was hired to produce that segment, here is how I would do it.
First, train the AI on the entire series of House of Cards to get an accurate reproduction of Underwood's voice.
Write the script for the interview.
Have the AI read the script in Underwood's voice and check carefully for errors. It must be very convincing.
Set up the set for the interview. Carefully work out how Tucker can direct his comments to where Spacey's head will be. Some colored tape on the wall would work to give Tucker a target to talk to.
Record the interview as though Spacey was there, while running the recording of the AI reading the script. Perhaps use earbuds on Tucker so the fake voice doesn't leak into microphones.
With Tucker's part done, turn the project over to the special effects crew to make a convincing Underwood speaking his lines in perfect synchronization to the fake recording. Add gestures and facial expressions to match Underwood's style.
Trust me, with 3D modeling programs like Daz you would even have a slider to adjust exactly how much stubble would appear on Underwood's face.
Then, sit back and note how long before the public figures out the trick, even after explaining it beforehand as a trick to watch out for. Watch the MSM run with the "Spacey for Prez" sensationalism.
This also provides a clue why they'd use a known set of episodes to train the AI voice in Underwood's character. Spacey can't sue because it's the voice of a character, not the real Spacey. They are not impersonating the real Spacey, just his famous character.
Do you think I'm close to the answer? Tucker would consider this worth risking his reputation of association. It explains everything.
Give me the source video an I will yell you conclusively is it is or is not by using an Ai which can detect and sort deep fakes.
Plz use correct grammar. It would be "is is is or is it isn't " kek. Couldn't help myself.
Is you is, or is you ain't my baby?
you must be older than I would have thought, this is absolutely the tippy top most kek. thanks, fren.
Outstanding analysis and probably somewhat close to the truth…. This was a definite ‘Red Pill’. When the MSM finally takes the bait … Tucker will reveal the truth to his 3M viewers, then Rogan, then Bannon, Etc …even if the MSM ignores it; Tucker will still reveal the charade - awakening millions of normies to the scam the DS been has been perpetuating on the world populace for 60+ years…. There hoax is beginning to unravel…. Thank you @Tucker!
Seems like that's the game eh!
Of course it's faked. It seems very obvious to me, it even looks faked / AI.
Added bonus if it was thus faked: It makes the MSM look like a bunch of gullible fools for running the Spacey President story. The MSM has to run retractions and admit they don't know what is real.
The moment I watched the interview, I could easily tell it was fake. Something seemed a little off.
You have outlined the process through which such a interview could be faked, but the question is - why do you think its faked? Why can't it be real?
To show how it's easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled.
We HAVE to learn to spot professional level fakes.
Or, there is an alternate explanation. There was some past discussion regarding this. The time line is pretty interesting.
Why would spacey's youtube channel post the "interview"?
https://youtu.be/WqPePWyduxQ?si=_iahnBoVwmX0Coan
Spacey is either dead or @ GITMO - what you saw was a ‘Deep Fake’ ….
Because Spacey is in on the scheme. He will be more famous for having done it.
If spacey is in on the scheme, a la kayzer soze, well now, that would be pretty fuck'n cool. That would mean he was a plant. Not a pedo fag and the accusers who died were not real. I don't think it's a.i. Still don't understand why tucker allowed him in the same room he's in, let alone joke around. We'll see.
While some of the techniques you suggest are plausible, I do not think your theory passes the Occam's Razor test. It's a lot of time and resources used to deceive from a guy who has historically been a straight shooter. To what end?
I think Tucker and Spacey were both cancelled in a sense, for false allegations, and they have some camaraderie over that. Tucker has never shied away from defending controversial figures.
False accusations for Spacey, I think not. He's been to Epstein Island and 4 of his accusers are dead.
And sitting on the queen's throne with Maxwell to boot.
I think Tucker has warned us just this week that possibly nothing is real, and he'll reveal this hoax within a week.
Interesting theory. I'll check back within a week I guess.
Well it's been a week. What are your thoughts?
Disappointment. Why would they craft such a weird ass video with Spacey in character? There's got to be a better explanation than "just because."
It wasn't real.
Whether it is fake or not is only sort of the point. It’s the fact that we even have to wonder or not that is really the main point. There are many things to take from this:
The fact that we could even question whether it was real or not in the first place tells us we should really, as he says when he looked into the camera, which is the only time in House of Cards that Frank Underwood can be trusted to tell us the truth as he sees it, “Believe nothing that we hear and only half of what we see” because the advances in technology make us incredibly susceptible to fake stories, fake images, and fake footage, and thus, we need to tune into our higher faculties of logic, investigation, and even prayer to determine what is true and what is false.
The choice of Underwood as the vehicle for this message in the first place, who, in House of Cards, despite being a lying, murdering, Bohemian Grove attending Deep State politician who, along with his wife Claire, are clearly meant to parody a wide range of such politicians, the most obvious of which is the Clintons, ALWAYS tells the truth when looking into the camera even if he just got finished lying to someone else in his “real” life. He is an evil being but a reliable narrator in the show because he has no reason to believe, like the character Deadpool, that telling an audience of another universe (us) the truth of his intentions will have any impact on his plans in his own. In other words, Frank Underwood just told us all a very vital truth and we actually should ignore who is playing him, deep fake or not, because not only is that this particular character’s schtick, it’s also obviously true and we have no reason to doubt it. Ukraine war images have been faked a la “Wag the Dog” and we see other political figures wearing masks and using stages that are obviously stages, etc. It’s a strange medium but obvious to anyone who watched that show, which, dare I say, most people in the country have.
It’s been posted on both Tucker’s and Spacy’s. accounts and neither of them have bothered to step in and explain what’s really going on here. Why? Because we’re meant to figure the damn thing out for ourselves. It’s a message in and of itself that we need to activate critical thinking and if we haven’t seen the show, to have others who have seen it inform our theories through the public square, such as we’re doing now.
If anything, it feels like a fun way to warm the masses up to the Q posts, as that’s exactly what’s needed to understand what the hell is going on there.
I think that's why it was done. To sharpen our discernment, which we really need sharpened.
I'm looking forward to the reveal. I'd really like to see an alternate ending where Spacey unscrews his head and hands it to Tucker. Craniums everywhere would explode, which would totally justify the expense.
My comment from yesterday when this vid first showed up...
Don't know if it's faked, but it looks very gay.
Kek
Didn't look real to me. Also they show the back of tuckers head that camera angle is never in a live interview. Looked like it was to convince us they were in the same room.
I agree that it's a production, not real...but what I don't get is why.
I have no idea what Carlson says or said about this, but if it's real, Tucker Carlson is an idiot, and if it's fake and he isn't saying that it is, what small trust I had in him is gone.