2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oddly, I can't edit this post. I've tried several times. ...Could there be a problem due to its length?

7
simon_says 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks - that passage was a break from my normal style. I wasn't sure how it might be received. Sounds like it hit the mark.

7
simon_says 7 points ago +7 / -0

We agree about not being in open default. And we agree about the Fed's ability to create money.

I'm not sure we are on the same page regarding being insolvent. But I could elaborate.

As for being anonymous - my good friend on this site posts under his real name. That's why I said "like so many of you..."

When I read first read your post saying I wan't anonymous, I gulped a bit. I assumed you meant my identity was available. I think it is evident you mean something related to QAnon - and me not being related to the "Anon" portion of that. Absolutely right. I'm not a "Q" guy. I really never followed it at all. Somewhat recently, I examined the posts (briefly) and concluded they are "real." But what I mean by that is another wall of text.

Be well. And may victory be yours soon.

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not sure what you mean by "anon cred." I post anonymously in the sense that I have not stated my real name - just like most everyone here.

...Being insolvent and being in open default are not the same thing. I know these are long, and I haven't wanted to elongate them with even more explanation. If I wasn't clear - my apologies, and I can explain.

9
simon_says 9 points ago +9 / -0

May I ask: the portion setting the scene with Yellen and Fraser... I wasn't sure about writing that. Did you like it? Or should I skip that sort of thing in the future?

5
simon_says 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stay tuned for subsequent Parts!

6
simon_says 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm best in prose. Words, sentences, paragraphs. Boring shit.

Others need to take this forward from here.

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are too kind, Bubble. Thank you.

9
simon_says 9 points ago +9 / -0

I pieced it together with information from a couple of different (government) sources. Let me follow up with links and explanations of how to reproduce.

...The more damning part is that we are printing about 50% of the money we are paying out. Basically, we have increased the rate of debt accumulation so greatly, we don't know how to legitimately market the securities. So we are laundering the securities through banks:

Treasurys --> Banks --> Fed.

And the Fed prints money to buy them.

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a series I'm writing that - at present - is tracing the economic basis for everything that is going on. It will reach motives in other realms too.

It appears to have a solid niche following - I am humbled. People have been asking me for Part 6, so i thought I'd let people know it's out.

10
simon_says 10 points ago +10 / -0

For those who are interested, Part 6 of The Simon Lectures is up. Here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6SpCAse/the-simon-lectures--series-i--pa/

Also, there has not yet been a ruling in the case in Nevada, in which Lindell has asked to lift the gag order on Montgomery. Lindell has until this Friday to reply to the United States' opposition.

For those unfamiliar with motion practice in federal court:

motion --> opposition --> reply --> hearing --> ruling.

The first three stages are all paperwork. You don't technically have to file a reply, but I'm not sure I've seen an instance where that step is skipped. So, it is the paperwork step of filing the reply that has been extended to this Friday. After that, there will be a hearing and then a ruling. Perhaps I should explain this in more detail, as I have previously, for those who haven't been following. This is very important!

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll roll up my sleeves and get to work.

I appreciate your kind words, Saline. Thank you.

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm aiming for about one week. Fingers crossed on that. :-)

Thank you for reading this - as I've said I somewhat shocked that people give this attention. It is an honor.

6
simon_says 6 points ago +6 / -0

As I said elsewhere, I regard it as an honor to have any degree of readership. ...I'll keep them coming as fast as I can. :-)

5
simon_says 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm actually honored that people read these and care. Thank you, sir.

6
simon_says 6 points ago +6 / -0

You are VERY smart! ...Part 6 looms. Stay tuned.

8
simon_says 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't know if you've been following this whole Series or not. In the last Part, I mentioned that I'm jumping from mountaintop to mountaintop. The Southern Border is an example of that. I could write an entire series about that situation, but I'm not.

I am not commenting on the wisdom of this approach, its broader effects or its efficacy. I'm not commenting on whether it is working or will work. I'm just observing the governmental motivation for all of this. ...Do I think that there is an overlap of interests here relating to expansion of the labor market? Yes, I agree with you on that point and many others. I almost wrote about that - but I really want to move on to Part 6.

7
simon_says 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks for reading. I know consuming my material is taxing in a way that glancing at a meme is not.

5
simon_says 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for your prayers. I'm humbled. ...I'll post updates as I see progress in the case. I think it's possible Mr. Lindell surprises all of us before I have a chance to update, but that would be an outstanding turn of events.

7
simon_says 7 points ago +7 / -0

I will post separately on this topic. I stumbled upon something that many of you will find quite interesting. Sit tight.

9
simon_says 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm on the job - this is important! This is a joyful labor.

15
simon_says 15 points ago +15 / -0

No problem. I meant what I sad: this one is for all the marbles.

3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you - both for the compliment and the sticky.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›