1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a speculative theory related to that. Not sure if the theory will make it into this series, though. ...I agree with your point: If the Saudis peel off, things change in a hurry.

Thanks for reading.

1
simon_says 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi, friend.

Good question, and solid conclusion relating to me having functioned as an M&A attorney - that conclusion squares with what I've said. Nevertheless, I was never an M&A attorney, nor was I functioning as one during the "mission" where I learned certain facts. At that time, I was serving in a rather irregular, unconventional capacity - not one really possible to deduce from facts available.

Over and out. Keep up the good critical thinking.

3
simon_says 3 points ago +3 / -0

I start up companies. So I know everything you're saying is true. ...It's crossed my mind that if the platform would not have needed to withstand the general public, then perhaps it could have been built much faster than I immediately believed. Still, all in, no. He started with the platform. ...That said, maybe what you're saying is correct. You go on my "follow" list!

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think he has determined that this dynamic rules the day. And he's pressing his advantage.

8
simon_says 8 points ago +8 / -0

I didn't realize AMA's were conducted on this platform. I'm not necessarily opposed to doing one at some time, although I think you all may be let down: as I've said before, I'm just a guy connecting dots. But I'm happy to connect them with you in a "live" fashion some time. I can't do that today, though.

6
simon_says 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've considered the exact same thing regarding admissibility. I have some thoughts on the matter, but they're a little too long for me to type out right now. They're also somewhat speculative. I'll try to get back in here and type them out later. I'd like your view on one particular aspect.

8
simon_says 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well... I was in college in the early 90s (electrical engineering) and in law school in the late 90s. So there's a chance!

9
simon_says 9 points ago +9 / -0

Interesting. If you have a link to a Rumble video (or whatever), I'd love to listen. Thanks, friend.

22
simon_says 22 points ago +22 / -0

I think that the NSA is large, and like any large body of people, it contains within itself people of all stripes. Including brave, patriotic people who helped out Gregg. But no one can admit that.

19
simon_says 19 points ago +19 / -0

I know that the leadership of the NSA cannot possibly admit to having provided the data and toolset to Gregg. They have to deny that.

I suspect that in private circles in Washington, they are saying that they provided Gregg with access to the data and tools, with the understanding that he would use them for a different purpose. But Gregg double-crossed them by outright appropriating the data and toolsets on to his own servers, and then using them for a different purpose. So he misappropriated it. Their story will be something along those lines.

What do I think? I think that access to the data and platforms is tightly monitored. So some rogue elements within the NSA gave it to Gregg so he could do - using third party systems - what they could not do from within (because they would not be permitted).

22
simon_says 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'm always happy to help out with my speculations. :-)

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

We're getting there, Mr_A. Sit tight!

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

Had someone VERY CLOSE to me ask Gregg Phillips about all of this on Truth Social.

No idea whether he'll respond (he owes no one a response), or whether he's free to respond truthfully and with candor.

But why not lead the horse to H2O, right?

4
simon_says 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you, Chronic.

I probably have a few more lengthy screeds in me. I'll contact you if they're blocked.

Best, Simon

10
simon_says 10 points ago +11 / -1

It's not simply the plain-as-day Q. It's the face he makes immediately thereafter.

8
simon_says 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is a good question. One that requires a lengthy answer - and some speculation on my part.

May I disappoint you by deferring until tomorrow? I don't have it in me to write a coherent lengthy reply tonight.

Bug me if you don't hear back from me. I won't mind.

2
simon_says 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, Trump spoke at length about the crappy USPS deal. It was undervalued, to say the least. Was the undervaluation part of the bribe to arrange Bezos' cooperation?

"Bozo." LOL. That was Trump's name for him. You definitely see what I'm getting at: these two HATED one another. It was personal. There's more I could say on this front, but I'll leave it here for now.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›