When DJT made air q's during the rallies in 2018, 2019, they were crystal clear. The circle, completed, and then the dash, a downstroke at 45 degree angle.
The gesture here is very similar to another gesture he commonly uses, which is the inclusive "O". A circle, completed, and then sometimes followed with a point to the people, as is done here. It's a gesture saying "all of you, you!" It's an acknowledgment of the people he's looking at.
In the footage from the 2018, 2019 rallies, his air Q's were in clear response to Q signs in the crowd. Like Baby Q, or the building Q presence at the rallies. It was a direct acknowledgement of that Q presence, as displayed by the Q pedes and the Q signs and t-shirts. Like, "oh, there's mah Q peeps. Q"
If this is the 'clearest air q' you've seen, were you following in 2018/19? Because there were some very, crystal clear Qs at that time. There was a whole thing going on, where the Q presence goty bigger and bigger, and DJT's team decided to stop folks from wearing Q t-shirts in or Q signs, to sort of keep a lid on the thing. Q discussed this during that whole period on the board with anons.
Here, who is DJT gesturing to, and what? Unless it was baby Q or a Q t shirt or a bunch of Q pedes, I'd say the basis for describing this as an air Q are flimsy.
Call me a skeptic, but I think pedes want so much to see the air Qs, that they read into it too much.
Q+ has certainly done some hefty air q's, but I don't see it in this one.
Os don't tend to have the embellishment of the little curly that is clearly visible in this.
Take your sarcastic "And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning..." And shove it deep up your ass, assuming you still have room, seeing as you seem to already be up your own ass. Thanks.
Well, the consensus among anons is that this is an airQ. I'm not sold on that, and that's all I'm expressing here. It's not as if there is a lot riding on this.
One of the advantages of having a high threshold of convincement (?) is that when I see the data and the info and I am convinced, it's very solid and also, I can place a very high degree of confidence in my conclusions.
Many times one encounters on this forum and in other places where pedes seeking the truth leap to conclusions, or interpret certain things as Y when later on it becomes clear they are G, etc, etc.
Look at how many of us thought Y would happen after Nov 3, after november 6, after November 28, Jan 6, Jan 15, Jan 20, etc. What's the lesson there?
It's OK to reach different conclusions. I've watched the clip several times, and I've observed how many anons accept this as a definitive Air Q. Should I alter my perceptions and my conclusions simply to adjust to the majority view?
Maybe they are seeing something I'm not, or maybe I'm seeing something they are not.
None of this affects my confidence in Q, or DJT, or in the ongoing war. It DOES make me ask about where a lot of our anons are at, by I do that all the time, anyway.
Either way, I appreciate the feedback, but until something else comes to light, I'm OK with my position on this. Cheers.
OTOH, this must be that plausible deniability I've heard about. Leave JUST enough room for doubt so you can say "no it's not" and have people believe that.
Took me a....while to find this vid, thought it was in GIF format, but couldn't recall offhand. Got it now. This vid I saved off Telegram last year so unknown who the OP is, but looks to be from CPAC 2019.
As far as this thread's OP is concerned, this is certainly an air Q - the circle and then an index finger point to signify the tail. I've seen better examples, but I'll take a shot of hopium anytime, anywhere lol.
Thanks Beat it. Yeah, this is one I was thinking of. I also searched, but didn't think of looking for a gif. Gonna be ripping this one to my hard drive.
I've seen better examples, but I'll take a shot of hopium anytime, anywhere lol.
I was gonna write about this, but in the end, I left it off my comment. I wanted to say something like, I simply don't need to see an air q or such, in order to lift my spirits or somehow encourage me. Because I'm way, way beyond that now. But it felt like it might be interpreted as a dig against pedes, so I desisted.
Hey, I don't mind anyone getting their hopium (although I am a fan of the more healthier (IMO) Hopermectin).
I thought, also, it's gonna be unpopular with some to post a contrary opinion. But whatevs. I'm a bit beyond that too.
Frankly, when I hear DJT speak, I see how he acts, I watch him in action, that's all the confirmation and encouragement I need. I invariably am moved to tears when I watch him, because I feel so strongly who is really behind him.
With the OP, maaah, maah, maybe, maybe not. There are too many other possible interpretations for me to side with a WOW, this is a big air Q. But like I said, that's my predilection. I side on the nay when there are other plausible or equally logical (or more logical) explanations.
I'd love nothing more for DJT to say, dude, you're totally wrong. I was giving air q's all over the place. Why didn't you see them?
But love this gif.
I dunno. Maybe I'm just wrong, but I gotta write what I see, ya know?
No problem. The thing with the air Q's and DJT mentioning 17....is it gives us hope(rmectin) that Trump and the patriots are still moving forward. NCSWIC and Enjoy the Show.....however, with everything that's happening around us, the reminders from Q+ are, as I said, a shot of hope. It's the same reason he's continuing to hold rallies, hold speeches, and still being a leader, despite not being "president" (officially, anyway).
Frankly, when I hear DJT speak, I see how he acts, I watch him in action, that's all the confirmation and encouragement I need. I invariably am moved to tears when I watch him, because I feel so strongly who is really behind him.
Fully agreed here. God is protecting him from the forces of evil, as he moves to rip out the roots of the Cabal and Satan once and for all.
I'll admit that I downvoted one of your other comments in this thread, because it came off poorly, regarding the validity of the OP air Q. Your explanation here is what matters (even if we disagree on this insignificant issue), because the comment, by itself, comes off as a bit shilly, IMHO. But a lot of your comments/threads are excellent otherwise, so it must just be the autism this time ;). Thanks for the additional info. Retracted my earlier downvote.
I find it a curious experience to be denigrated and even attacked in this community when one expresses opinion that is contrary to the popular one. I mean, case in point. I mean, I wasn't shilling (obviously.) I just didn't see the air q, and then proceeded to offer reasoning etc, why I reached my conclusion.
Shills are shills, but there seems to be a lot of angst sometimes for some folks when one expresses a view they don't agree with.
That said, I come off poorly on a regular basis, until there's an actual engagement and discussion, and then it seems to get pretty well. Except if the other person is just abusive, as is sadly, sometimes the case. Fortunately, not too often, tho.
But that's the hard part: we're constantly flooded with an influx of shills and people trying to sow chaos, due to what TGA is about. It's not always easy to discern the truth from the half-truths, lies, omissions of truth, etc.
The downvote button isn't an "I disagree" button either, but, just like with plebbit, it's sometimes used that way, as is my instance here. I don't typically do that, but I really didn't follow your logic for holding that opinion, along with what was written and how it came across.
It's OK to agree to disagree and that should be said more often on here. But you're also right that people can be attacked for holding a non-popular/non-accepted viewpoint too. Namecalling and strawman attacks should never get to that point....but it is the internet after all lmao.
This is probably the most crystal clear air Q I've ever seen President Trump make!
u/#trumphappening
☝🏻This!!
soz. i don't see it.
When DJT made air q's during the rallies in 2018, 2019, they were crystal clear. The circle, completed, and then the dash, a downstroke at 45 degree angle.
Like this one from earlier this year:
https://rumble.com/v136y76-donald-trump-air-q-may-1-2022-rally-in-greenwood-nebraska.html
The gesture here is very similar to another gesture he commonly uses, which is the inclusive "O". A circle, completed, and then sometimes followed with a point to the people, as is done here. It's a gesture saying "all of you, you!" It's an acknowledgment of the people he's looking at.
In the footage from the 2018, 2019 rallies, his air Q's were in clear response to Q signs in the crowd. Like Baby Q, or the building Q presence at the rallies. It was a direct acknowledgement of that Q presence, as displayed by the Q pedes and the Q signs and t-shirts. Like, "oh, there's mah Q peeps. Q"
If this is the 'clearest air q' you've seen, were you following in 2018/19? Because there were some very, crystal clear Qs at that time. There was a whole thing going on, where the Q presence goty bigger and bigger, and DJT's team decided to stop folks from wearing Q t-shirts in or Q signs, to sort of keep a lid on the thing. Q discussed this during that whole period on the board with anons.
Here, who is DJT gesturing to, and what? Unless it was baby Q or a Q t shirt or a bunch of Q pedes, I'd say the basis for describing this as an air Q are flimsy.
Call me a skeptic, but I think pedes want so much to see the air Qs, that they read into it too much.
Q+ has certainly done some hefty air q's, but I don't see it in this one.
...are you blind?
Apparently.
At any rate, I've seen air Q's 100x clearer than this. I mean, if there is room for doubt, I tend to err on the side of doubt.
And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning, context and analysis. Sorry if my results don't agree with yours.
How would YOU distinguish between the inclusive circle gestures DJT does and air Qs?
Os don't tend to have the embellishment of the little curly that is clearly visible in this.
Take your sarcastic "And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning..." And shove it deep up your ass, assuming you still have room, seeing as you seem to already be up your own ass. Thanks.
Your first comment was seemed pretty antagonistic, for someone just sharing a view.
Your follow up comment seems to confirm it.
But, either way, mea culpa. The sarcastic remark was probably uncalled for. But I'll leave the discussion at this point.
I see it as more of a capital cursive Q.
Hmmmm.... Interesting.
literally said that to myself out loud then saw this comment lmao
Pretty soon he'll be carrying a Q sign.
That was definitely an air Q!!!
Hold on I'm coming intensifies :)
Giggity
Pass that hopium pipe…. Bout to give Hunter Biden a run for his laundered money.
Okay, I had heard about these before but never seen one. I was skeptical but now, yeah, that's a Q.
It's not simply the plain-as-day Q. It's the face he makes immediately thereafter.
Yeah, he's like laughing with it too.
I don't think so.
Here's one that I think is definitively more clearly a Q.
https://rumble.com/v136y76-donald-trump-air-q-may-1-2022-rally-in-greenwood-nebraska.html
Well, the consensus among anons is that this is an airQ. I'm not sold on that, and that's all I'm expressing here. It's not as if there is a lot riding on this.
One of the advantages of having a high threshold of convincement (?) is that when I see the data and the info and I am convinced, it's very solid and also, I can place a very high degree of confidence in my conclusions.
Many times one encounters on this forum and in other places where pedes seeking the truth leap to conclusions, or interpret certain things as Y when later on it becomes clear they are G, etc, etc.
Look at how many of us thought Y would happen after Nov 3, after november 6, after November 28, Jan 6, Jan 15, Jan 20, etc. What's the lesson there?
It's OK to reach different conclusions. I've watched the clip several times, and I've observed how many anons accept this as a definitive Air Q. Should I alter my perceptions and my conclusions simply to adjust to the majority view?
Maybe they are seeing something I'm not, or maybe I'm seeing something they are not.
None of this affects my confidence in Q, or DJT, or in the ongoing war. It DOES make me ask about where a lot of our anons are at, by I do that all the time, anyway.
Either way, I appreciate the feedback, but until something else comes to light, I'm OK with my position on this. Cheers.
I saw that too! agree that the air-Q seems to be getting more obvious...YAY!
Thaaat's a reaaaally big and bold one
u/#trumpdance
Not sure what the point would be if it WEREN'T an air Q
That just looks like a swirl to me.
OTOH, this must be that plausible deniability I've heard about. Leave JUST enough room for doubt so you can say "no it's not" and have people believe that.
Cursive capital Q?
It looks like the JFK site, same Q.
SERIOUS FACE during the Air Q, but a smile & a nod just after.
Has anyone with some skill thought about leaving following the path of his hand and leaving a trail in a editor
https://files.catbox.moe/1ihxja.mp4
Took me a....while to find this vid, thought it was in GIF format, but couldn't recall offhand. Got it now. This vid I saved off Telegram last year so unknown who the OP is, but looks to be from CPAC 2019.
As far as this thread's OP is concerned, this is certainly an air Q - the circle and then an index finger point to signify the tail. I've seen better examples, but I'll take a shot of hopium anytime, anywhere lol.
/u/Qanaut u/FractalizingIron
Thanks Beat it. Yeah, this is one I was thinking of. I also searched, but didn't think of looking for a gif. Gonna be ripping this one to my hard drive.
I was gonna write about this, but in the end, I left it off my comment. I wanted to say something like, I simply don't need to see an air q or such, in order to lift my spirits or somehow encourage me. Because I'm way, way beyond that now. But it felt like it might be interpreted as a dig against pedes, so I desisted.
Hey, I don't mind anyone getting their hopium (although I am a fan of the more healthier (IMO) Hopermectin).
I thought, also, it's gonna be unpopular with some to post a contrary opinion. But whatevs. I'm a bit beyond that too.
Frankly, when I hear DJT speak, I see how he acts, I watch him in action, that's all the confirmation and encouragement I need. I invariably am moved to tears when I watch him, because I feel so strongly who is really behind him.
With the OP, maaah, maah, maybe, maybe not. There are too many other possible interpretations for me to side with a WOW, this is a big air Q. But like I said, that's my predilection. I side on the nay when there are other plausible or equally logical (or more logical) explanations.
I'd love nothing more for DJT to say, dude, you're totally wrong. I was giving air q's all over the place. Why didn't you see them?
But love this gif.
I dunno. Maybe I'm just wrong, but I gotta write what I see, ya know?
No problem. The thing with the air Q's and DJT mentioning 17....is it gives us hope(rmectin) that Trump and the patriots are still moving forward. NCSWIC and Enjoy the Show.....however, with everything that's happening around us, the reminders from Q+ are, as I said, a shot of hope. It's the same reason he's continuing to hold rallies, hold speeches, and still being a leader, despite not being "president" (officially, anyway).
Fully agreed here. God is protecting him from the forces of evil, as he moves to rip out the roots of the Cabal and Satan once and for all.
I'll admit that I downvoted one of your other comments in this thread, because it came off poorly, regarding the validity of the OP air Q. Your explanation here is what matters (even if we disagree on this insignificant issue), because the comment, by itself, comes off as a bit shilly, IMHO. But a lot of your comments/threads are excellent otherwise, so it must just be the autism this time ;). Thanks for the additional info. Retracted my earlier downvote.
I find it a curious experience to be denigrated and even attacked in this community when one expresses opinion that is contrary to the popular one. I mean, case in point. I mean, I wasn't shilling (obviously.) I just didn't see the air q, and then proceeded to offer reasoning etc, why I reached my conclusion.
Shills are shills, but there seems to be a lot of angst sometimes for some folks when one expresses a view they don't agree with.
That said, I come off poorly on a regular basis, until there's an actual engagement and discussion, and then it seems to get pretty well. Except if the other person is just abusive, as is sadly, sometimes the case. Fortunately, not too often, tho.
But that's the hard part: we're constantly flooded with an influx of shills and people trying to sow chaos, due to what TGA is about. It's not always easy to discern the truth from the half-truths, lies, omissions of truth, etc.
The downvote button isn't an "I disagree" button either, but, just like with plebbit, it's sometimes used that way, as is my instance here. I don't typically do that, but I really didn't follow your logic for holding that opinion, along with what was written and how it came across.
It's OK to agree to disagree and that should be said more often on here. But you're also right that people can be attacked for holding a non-popular/non-accepted viewpoint too. Namecalling and strawman attacks should never get to that point....but it is the internet after all lmao.
I could see if my GIF program would let me do that... Might take awhile though. Could be a fun project!
symbolism will be our triumph
B e a yuutiful
Yeehaw
Acknowledgment from Q+, aka 4 10 20, aka DJT.
He says "AND BEYOND"
When?
It looks like Trump mouths "and beyond" before the air q