Hi, folks. Happy 17th. Could today be a momentous day? I certainly hope so. In a previous post, I have stated I am a guest here, and I provide Q-adjacent speculation. This post is more content in that same vein. To be extremely clear, it is my hope above all hopes that POTUS has a winning plan (or multiple paths to success and contingency plans- more likely), that US politics will be cleaned up, and that Biden and Harris will not come into power. That being said, some of my speculations below will have to address potential outcomes that run contrary to my own cautious optimism, as I do my best to prepare for a multitude of scenarios.
It is my observations that GAW is stuck in a sort of a false dichotomy: Q believers insist Q is true and the grand finale will come to pass. On the other end of the dichotomy, Q critics insist that Q is a LARP or a psy-op (like Operation Trust) run against POTUS and his followers.
There are other possibilities though. For example, Q could be real but not ultimately succeed. Q could also have been real at times and not real at other times. Rather than a LARP or a psy-op, if unsuccessful, Q might be better understood as a (likely short-lived) religious movement and if so, there are predictable patterns it would follow if its most important predictions fail (these would be akin to failed prophecies).
To comment first on the dichotomous thinking, if Q is real and its predictions pass, you more or less know what to do, and so long as everything is done in accordance with justice, I will join you all in celebrating the most important victory for our nation since the American Revolution. As for the possibility of Q being a LARP or a psy-op, I dismiss both of these assertions as nonsense. Even as a person mostly ignorant of Q, I can already tell that Q has produced too many proofs to simply be a LARP (internet trolling others for lols), and if it was a psy-op against POTUS and his followers, all the president would have had to do was publicly disavow it in very clear and unambiguous terms. Also, why would the Deep State or anti-MAGA forces construct a psy-op just to ask big tech and the main stream media to do everything in their power to silence it? If it was constructed, it would be amplified; not aggressively silenced. Maybe some silencing would be performed as reverse psychology, but 'some silencing' is not what were are experiencing. The censorship has been very, very heavy-handed.
Regarding the other possibilities (not exhaustive) I indicated, Q could be real and not succeed. There seems to be at least some amount of real, otherwise undisclosed intel contained within Q, and also POTUS, Pompeo, and others have almost certainly used Q to communicate with Q researchers in recent times, but... nothing about that guarantees the success of pro-MAGA forces. As for the possibility that Q has been sometimes real and sometimes not, there might be multiple reasons for that. Some intentional disinformation might have been necessary to keep Q afloat or to keep it mostly off of the radar of the Deep State. Maybe, even with excellent intel, some inaccurate predictions would still occur, and this would be consistent with what is typically assumed to be true about military intelligence.
As to my last bit of speculation, which is the most important, if Q is a religious movement, the popularity of which hinges on prophecies (possibly just empowerment fantasies) that go on to be proven false, we can anticipate a pattern. As a case study, please read up on the evangelist and failed end-of-times prophet, Harold Camping of 'Family Radio.' If Q predictions about the overthrowing of the deep state, mass arrests, tribunals, etc. do not come to pass within the logically correct timeline, we can expect the timeline to be pushed further into the future with fanciful apologetics (defenses of the faith) which do not make sense logically. For example, there is no real logic in Biden being sworn in as actually being 'part of the plan' or that a delay in the originally suggested timeline was actually done to give the forces of MAGA a 'stronger hand' in the long run. The 'hand' is already as strong as it would need to be, and it is unlikely to grow any stronger under a Biden/Harris administration. Harold Camping eventually had to admit he was wrong about his two failed end times predictions, but Q has the option of just disappearing. That could happen, and/or Q or someone(s) claiming to be Q could keep it going a bit longer for whatever gain it provides them.
Even a failed religious movements can cast a long shadow because some of the faithful have sunk years of their life into the movement, invested their own credibility in it, and attached their reputations to its success. Failed movements can be extremely hard to walk away from. If the logical timeline falls though, I strongly encourage you all to discontinue your involvement in Q. There are better uses for your time, and there are other real ways to be a force for positive change in the world. Lastly, I would like to once again discourage violence. It is worth remembering, for instance, that violence is not what ultimately brought down the USSR. We have other tools at our disposal.
Before you smash the downvote, remember- I hope the deep state is brought down and Biden and Harris are kept from power. That would be a dream come true, but I advise you all to mentally prepare yourself for a multitude of potential outcomes. Happy 17th ! May the patriots enjoy the blessings of victory!
Hi, folks. I have not been part of any Q-related community in the past, and presently in GAW, I just consider myself a guest and a curious, open-minded reader. Let me be crystal clear that I condemn all political violence in America (the majority of which comes from the left, but I'll set that tangent aside for now). Q is far too complicated for me to comment on because I am very new to it. I am not being coy in writing that. I am genuinely ignorant of most things Q. I do; however, have some Q-adjacent observations I would like to share which are apparent to me as a specialist in both rhetoric and 'reading' people (both are absolutely essential to my professional work). It is indeed my hope that my speculations below calm readers and bring peace to those who might be on edge.
Observation: The President unquestionably believes he can still win or at the very least that Biden & Harris will never hold positions as President and Vice President. Evidence: The key players have never used the word “concede” explicitly, nor have the names of the 'victors' ever been mentioned. ...not by the President, not by Pompeo, and not even by the First Lady... If you doubt this, reread the alleged 'concessions' and compare them to concessions from previous election cycles. The difference will astound anyone who hasn't already noticed it. It takes a lot of careful wording to make something have the flavor of a concession while actually conceding nothing. Wording like that is not accidental. Remark: I have no crystal ball. I am not saying who wins. I am analyzing rhetoric (formulated in the mind or as writing prior to speaking) and authenticity (does the person's voice and body language suggest that they believe the 'script'). The President, a profoundly well-informed person who receives the highest level of intelligence briefings available to anyone in any of the Three Branches, BELIEVES he will prevail or at the very least, that his opposition will fail.
Observation: Pence was brave; literally. Evidence: If you can do so in a calm state of mind, go back and re-listen to the President's speech on the day of the supposed 'betrayal.' I don't remember the exact wording, but he said it would be brave for Pence to uphold the constitution, but it would be even braver to do nothing. This is utterly bizarre wording and it stuck out like a sore thumb. If the intent was to suggest that Pence should be brave and do the right thing and be afraid of the consequences of doing the wrong thing, then the way it was phrased, as a choice between two positives, would be so inartful, logically-tortured, and convoluted that it would not be worth saying at all, but the President repeated some version of this line around three or more times in almost an identical way each time (a choice between two positives). With that in mind, try assuming a different meaning as you listen and then re-gauge the authenticity of the message and its clarity for you as a listener. Try this: 'it would take bravery for Pence to uphold the constitution (kick the can down the road by using the strategy that the opposition expects and has prepared for), but it would take even more bravery to do nothing (open the flood gates for a high-risk, high-reward solution that first deceives and then dooms the opposition).' Remark: Yes, in my own estimation Pence is not only a double-agent, but the opposition fell for it hook, line, and sinker until they followed up with him. Additionally, the President wanted at least some people to re-listen to this speech, figure out his real meaning after the fact, and inform others about it. Usually, this claim would be 'mind-reading,' but listen to it again and hone in on the authenticity of the delivery and the vastly greater clarity of the statement if the double-agent interpretation is applied.
Observation: Pompeo sounding exactly like Trump's understudy is not an accident. Evidence: Read not only Pompeo's recent Tweets but also his older ones. Listen to his recent speeches but also his older ones. He is progressively sounding more and more like Trump. Remark: Pompeo sounds like Trump and is acting Trumpian because he will have to be Trump at least temporarily, and he needs the blessing of over half of the country (Trump supporters), and at least initially he will have some degree of good will from independents and even some leftists because they have not ingested years of propaganda that primes them to hate him. The play, although not easy, will be to make Trump supporters like Pompeo because they speak and act the same way, while also bringing along others under the guise of 'at least that Trump guy is not in power anymore.'