We don't have enough concrete information to identify exactly who Q is. My personal guess is that Q is actually a group of people - patriot insiders - in a variety of positions and organizations within and around our government and military.
The keyword there is guess. That's all any of us can do at this point. The two bigger and more important takeaways are these:
Does Q tell us what to think or does Q give us a starting point which we are encouraged to use as a basis for our own research? (Hint: better dust off those research skills.)
Has Q told, communicated, hinted at, or insinuated anything at all that is harmful to our freedoms or infringes upon our rights? (Hint: no.)
The reliability of the Q movement comes down to research. Vetting. Questioning. Thinking for ourselves. Crowd sourcing information and intelligence. And at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter who or what Q is. It matters what we learn and what we do with that information.
We don't have enough concrete information to identify exactly who Q is. My personal guess is that Q is actually a group of people - patriot insiders - in a variety of positions and organizations within and around our government and military.
The keyword there is guess. That's all any of us can do at this point. The two bigger and more important takeaways are these:
Does Q tell us what to think or does Q give us a starting point which we are encouraged to use as a basis for our own research? (Hint: better dust off those research skills.)
Has Q told, communicated, hinted at, or insinuated anything at all that is harmful to our freedoms or infringes upon our rights? (Hint: no.)
The reliability of the Q movement comes down to research. Vetting. Questioning. Thinking for ourselves. Crowd sourcing information and intelligence. And at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter who or what Q is. It matters what we learn and what we do with that information.