So legit question what proves that QAnon is actually real? I've not seen anything that Q has said come to pass. The month of the December will likely be no different. Or will it? Explain.
EDIT: Also, why are some of you saying there's no proof needed while others are trying your hardest to provide just that? Which is it?
I really have read a lot of the posts and I'm not convinced. I'm here to hear it from Q believers, who should be able to provide reasons of why they believe this. This is not some sort of personal journey, it's something that can be proven or disproven. So the fact that Q believers cannot provide their reasons for following says more about QAnon than Q could ever say.
I would say that people calling for the U.S. military to be deployed on U.S. soil is fairly radical, just saying. Listening to Q is not thinking for yourself, rather it's following an alternative narrative.
I would say to that, look at Q less like some information source, giving some kind of orders to his followers. Look at him more like someone doing the opposite. The point of his posts over the four years prepares people to just disect the media and what they are told. He never asks for you to believe what he/they post. Thats not the point of it. Anons are just people who dig past the narrative, and Q has shown a huge contrast between what information is being supressed over the last 4 years. Its like a headache remembering every debunked or false story. Its like a wakeup call to do your own research.
I have a feeling you think Q is the predictor and all he says must come true, but he doesnt predict, he questions which leads Anons to dig. Im not sure if thats nefarioust to some, but to me its made me go from believing everything i hear and parroting it to, watching hours of comittees and comparing to the media spin. THAT is the purpose of Q. Do you need proof he has succeeded?
to be fair it wasnt Q who had me thinking there are satanic pedophiles in the world, thats not exactly a new development, but your missing the point, PROOF was never a part of the deal of following Q. If thats what you want, the best youll find is proof Q has some connection to Trumps team, whether hes right about things is for either time to tell or you to discern through digging.
I like talking to people who dont believe Q and the same trend is that they heard about Qanon from the media or someone elses opinion and want to look at it through that angle that Q is a leaker.
Leaking would be pretty illegal for a Q intel wouldnt it? So what other methods to bypass media are necessary. Socrates was a smart dude. I believe intel is buried in the complexity of Qposts however, on the surface all it is, is breadcrumbs of mostly public info, pointing out areas that people who do the digging will focus on. Then the digs surface through various supressed means.\
Questions with no answers, thats not leaking info. Understanding the purpose of Q- and the anon process will better your understanding of Q. Rather then saying he must prove info cuz some radical follower predicts something incorrect.
"Disinformation was necessary" was an early Qpost I never forgot, dont trust everything Q posts, the only proof is what you discover to be true.
It would be illegal to just say things outright, but wouldn't it be equally concerning if someone was leaking information that led people to the same conclusions? And if Q's posts don't do that, literally what is the point? Like I said, you don't have to be a Q follower to know that not everything the media says is true.
The "disinformation was necessary" honestly just seems like an attempt to cover his ass. Which is more likely: that Q is a government insider who's trying to keep a supposedly all-powerful government off him while trying to leak information (via clues) to the public or that Q is a liar, not a government insider, and he's just saying that to stop people from saying he was lying (because he was)?