Usually when I see Q post, they never seem to argue the validity of Q it’s self, they just post very interesting findings and “coincidences.” Yet, the attackers usually go in and attack Q’s validity with stupid shit like “Trust Sessions!” not ever questioning the info being presented to them. It screams classic commie tactics to me, screams “I’m a leftie shill paid by big tech to yell at people posting Q stuff.” Just sayin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
Exactly. The one I hate more is that it’s a CIA psyop. LMAO if it is, then we have nothing to worry about because the deep state is literally retarded. When people say that kind of shit I wonder if they know that Q was a lynchpin in the #walkaway movement? Also if you think Q is a psyop then your basically saying you don’t think that high level operatives are pedophiles, which is something that is basically proven with the Epstein/Maxwell saga, because why would they draw attention to that?
They would never shine light on their deeds because sunlight would destroy them.
Whatever Q is, it’s bringing about (mostly) good things. (Qualifier for those followers who take things a step too far - if any).
I didn't realize the connection between Q and #walkaway!
Ok yeah. Actually had a colleague walkaway this summer. He said that he had been researching Q and wondered if I heard about it. Back then I told him that while it was good he stepped away from the idiocy I said I didn’t think Q was real. I start to believe more and more now though, just too much crazy shit is starting to turn out.
Love your username~