I quite agree. However the absence of evidence can be poor evidence of absence. For instance, Dan Scavino's tweet about an Eagle (Bill Clinton's Secret Service codename) on ice on the 13th this month can be that very proof/evidence. I had mentioned days ago that in my experience, evidence if you will, isn't obvious unless you're looking for it or it was there the entire time, you just didn't recognize for what it was.
Or it could just be a picture of an eagle. Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sometimes a picture of an eagle is just a picture of an eagle.
However the absence of evidence can be poor evidence of absence.
The absence of evidence is proof itself of absence of evidence. The invisible and the non-existent are commonly confused with each other.
Or it could just be a picture of an eagle. Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sometimes a picture of an eagle is just a picture of an eagle.
And that's exactly how I initially saw Scavino's tweet. Didn't give it any further thought until today when I saw this post about BC, the comments that followed and his Secret Service codename. Now I have reason to look at his tweet differently.
How do we know it's bullshit?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
I quite agree. However the absence of evidence can be poor evidence of absence. For instance, Dan Scavino's tweet about an Eagle (Bill Clinton's Secret Service codename) on ice on the 13th this month can be that very proof/evidence. I had mentioned days ago that in my experience, evidence if you will, isn't obvious unless you're looking for it or it was there the entire time, you just didn't recognize for what it was.
Or it could just be a picture of an eagle. Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Sometimes a picture of an eagle is just a picture of an eagle.
The absence of evidence is proof itself of absence of evidence. The invisible and the non-existent are commonly confused with each other.
And that's exactly how I initially saw Scavino's tweet. Didn't give it any further thought until today when I saw this post about BC, the comments that followed and his Secret Service codename. Now I have reason to look at his tweet differently.
In this case, time will tell. They did say "sources say it will be made public soon."
Because we’ve seen tweets like this for 4 years and nothing has actually happened.