Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers?
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere?
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.
What do you think NASA has been doing since the 1980s? Their budgets are way bigger than their actual activity.
Maybe Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI debunked by media as an elaborate ruse against the Soviets was real? Starting to think anything CNN says is fake is probably real.
Good question. Very unclear at the moment. Pretty sure it is not coincidence it is happening now as a 300+ year old human enslavement cabal is being taken down.
That's true. Let's discuss that. Do you know what the atmospheric rate of absorption is for each wavelength of light is in the atmosphere? OK, that's a dick response from me, that's not fair. But it's different for every wavelength of light. Visible light is absorbed more readily than the higher wavelengths.. So, to reach earth with the max power geenerated, you need the higher wavelengths. But those wavelengths take more energy to generate. So as you describe how the target is destroyed, you're increasing your energy budget.
This energy must be generated/stored/released in orbit.
See where this is going? We have to have clues, indications, somewhat concrete descriptions of this tech, otherwise, it's just "beliefs." There are things we can deduce and know or require to understand to better understand this tech.
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
The only space-based DEWs are anti-sat.
.....you just described sunlight...
lmao
I'm crying ?
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.
That is kewl.
The only ones you know about.
What do you think NASA has been doing since the 1980s? Their budgets are way bigger than their actual activity.
Maybe Reagan’s “Star Wars” SDI debunked by media as an elaborate ruse against the Soviets was real? Starting to think anything CNN says is fake is probably real.
Mmm, maybe all that gobbledygook should... Yield evidence for....? What?
Good question. Very unclear at the moment. Pretty sure it is not coincidence it is happening now as a 300+ year old human enslavement cabal is being taken down.
That's true. Let's discuss that. Do you know what the atmospheric rate of absorption is for each wavelength of light is in the atmosphere? OK, that's a dick response from me, that's not fair. But it's different for every wavelength of light. Visible light is absorbed more readily than the higher wavelengths.. So, to reach earth with the max power geenerated, you need the higher wavelengths. But those wavelengths take more energy to generate. So as you describe how the target is destroyed, you're increasing your energy budget.
This energy must be generated/stored/released in orbit.
See where this is going? We have to have clues, indications, somewhat concrete descriptions of this tech, otherwise, it's just "beliefs." There are things we can deduce and know or require to understand to better understand this tech.