Been noticing several of this have been appearing on fire falling out of the sky. Some ppl believe an Energy Directed laser from a satellite took out the AT&T building and then these start falling out of the sky.
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers?
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere?
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.
Been noticing several of this have been appearing on fire falling out of the sky. Some ppl believe an Energy Directed laser from a satellite took out the AT&T building and then these start falling out of the sky.
There are NO sats with lasers capable of hitting the Earth. None. Zero. Learn physics, people.
McDonnell Douglas was working on it 40 years ago. Please tell us more.
Oh? And how are they powering these gigawatt lasers? How are they getting beams through 220 miles of atmosphere? How are the beams arriving still focused, their energy intact, to be filmed by dudes with cellphones 100m away?
The only space-based DEWs are anti-sat.
How are they powering direct energy lasers? Reflection. Direct energy from the ground. That big tesla tower in Texas. Advanced batteries. The potential for classified technology.
They shoot lasers at a reflector on the moon the size of a "paperback novel" and receive data from it bouncing directly back. That's public knowledge. Loss of intensity can be rectified by increasing the origin intensity enough to compensate for the loss.
Don't be the guy in 1944 writing about the impossibility of atomic bombs. You're a moderator at a Q forum, expand your mind a little.