You can not look at a high speed event and assume the camera caught everything perfectly. We have to took at how the camera captures an image or series of images when it comes to video.
If the camera is recording at 30 frames a second it misses a hell of a lot in the first few milliseconds. There are 1000 milliseconds in a second. The camera recording at 30 per second would be capturing only about 3% of what would be happening in milliseconds.
In this case the video frame just before the blast and the next frame which would be the first recorded of the blast are 1/30th of a second apart. When it comes to a blast that is one hell of a lot of time.
I am not an expert on this at all but that just makes sense.
So just looking at any video recording at that speed you really cannot tell exactly where the blast started.
The contrail if there was one is something completely different. I just don't think we should be saying the video proves that it was not a car bomb.
But that is the difference between you and the news. You gave a compelling argument that I could actually see happening and could easily see your point of view. They simply are saying the video is completely fake and leave it at that.
You can not look at a high speed event and assume the camera caught everything perfectly. We have to took at how the camera captures an image or series of images when it comes to video. If the camera is recording at 30 frames a second it misses a hell of a lot in the first few milliseconds. There are 1000 milliseconds in a second. The camera recording at 30 per second would be capturing only about 3% of what would be happening in milliseconds. In this case the video frame just before the blast and the next frame which would be the first recorded of the blast are 1/30th of a second apart. When it comes to a blast that is one hell of a lot of time. I am not an expert on this at all but that just makes sense.
So just looking at any video recording at that speed you really cannot tell exactly where the blast started. The contrail if there was one is something completely different. I just don't think we should be saying the video proves that it was not a car bomb.
But that is the difference between you and the news. You gave a compelling argument that I could actually see happening and could easily see your point of view. They simply are saying the video is completely fake and leave it at that.
There's actually better angles of footage that do show where it began. Pretty long ways away from RV + RV still standing AFTER blast.