Yes, Q sent me there during the Q&A, that was like three years ago, wow.
You can use https://searchvoat.co/ to find posts. It searches all of Voat, so if you're looking for something specific in the Q "anonymous" forum, QRV, you need to do a few things:
Put the search text in the box at the top.
Over on the right, under "Within subverse(s)", type "QRV".
Then below that, click the check box for "Search post body" (unless you know that what you're searching for, was in the title).
Finally, select the radio button (the circle) for "NSFW: include", as QRV's posts were marked that. Then click the "Search" button.
Additionally, if you had a link to something at voat.co, you can just "add 'search' to the beginning of the URL" and it will bring up the same content -- i.e., change "voat.co" to "searchvoat.co".
The only thing "missing" from the content, will be how it was voted. I guess that also means that things that were downvoted lower than -4, won't be "hidden" like they were on Voat, so you'll end up seeing a bit more filth.
I think I had made 21 of them or so before it went down. I had started daily digest posts to help out Wins of the Day Anon (WinsAnon) who was out for surgery for a few days, which ended up being a week.
Someone called me "VerboseAnon" and I liked it, so I bought the domain. :)
Others also appreciated my additional "editorializing", I guess, and asked for me to continue as did WinsAnon, so I have been doing so for a few days at my site.
kek, I just searched for my posts, and reading through my farewell I see that it also doesn't have the "[S]" to indicate who the submitter is (it also changed their usernumber to purple; the others were blue), as I see I had responded to someone's comment but it looks like it was another user (to me; since I had spent time on Voat). So that's also going to be confusing for newcomers.
There's tons of info on there though. Anyway you can see why they call me VerboseAnon! :)
In case you're interested, that farewell was https://searchvoat.co/v/QRV/4174416 and I put forward-and-backwards URL links in all my posts, so if you got to one, you can get to them all. (Of course, I just tested this and it's not simple: clicking on it gives an error since it goes to Voat; then I added "search" before "voat.co" and it worked.)
With this hernia and concussions I'm not the best "public personality" lol. But I am strongly considering the local state house. Keeping options open; it's helpful to be "retired" of sorts, fewer commitments so I get to make my own. Guess that's one reason I'm so verbose! :)
[They] gave us a ton of info in the movies and TV shows. And, I stopped watching for the most part years ago, not quite a decade and I still occasionally will watch a movie (Tenet sucked, was just "special effects strung together"). So I don't get nearly as much "input" from their motives and motivations that are put into their productions, as I used to.
But I've seen enough to put interesting pictures together.
For instance, the last two Avengers movies' running times total exactly 330 minutes; a "33" reference, the highest degree of Masonry and also the number of bones in the spine (and more). Converting to hours, it's 5h30m, or 5.5 hours, a "5 by 5" reference. The timing tells me that the Q team is involved, similar to how the Twitter "DOITQ" image filename told me the Q team has code at Twitter.
In those movies, half the people die. For five years. Then they come back, but when they come back they haven't aged. Not sure people will be coming back, but the sites that we lost? All that data is there (even if just the copy at searchvoat.co) so the possibility that the site can come back is greater than zero.
I often get lost in what I'm saying as well. Tell me about the video scrapbook?
You are welcome. I know lots of stuff and have lots of gaps as well. Feel free to ask anything and if I know or can find the answer, well, it's ask and receive, right? :)
hey there, welcome !
I wish I knew about Voat before it shutdown. Is there some archive of old posts?
Hi, thank you!
Yes, Q sent me there during the Q&A, that was like three years ago, wow.
You can use https://searchvoat.co/ to find posts. It searches all of Voat, so if you're looking for something specific in the Q "anonymous" forum, QRV, you need to do a few things:
Additionally, if you had a link to something at voat.co, you can just "add 'search' to the beginning of the URL" and it will bring up the same content -- i.e., change "voat.co" to "searchvoat.co".
The only thing "missing" from the content, will be how it was voted. I guess that also means that things that were downvoted lower than -4, won't be "hidden" like they were on Voat, so you'll end up seeing a bit more filth.
I think I had made 21 of them or so before it went down. I had started daily digest posts to help out Wins of the Day Anon (WinsAnon) who was out for surgery for a few days, which ended up being a week.
Someone called me "VerboseAnon" and I liked it, so I bought the domain. :)
Others also appreciated my additional "editorializing", I guess, and asked for me to continue as did WinsAnon, so I have been doing so for a few days at my site.
kek, I just searched for my posts, and reading through my farewell I see that it also doesn't have the "[S]" to indicate who the submitter is (it also changed their usernumber to purple; the others were blue), as I see I had responded to someone's comment but it looks like it was another user (to me; since I had spent time on Voat). So that's also going to be confusing for newcomers.
There's tons of info on there though. Anyway you can see why they call me VerboseAnon! :)
In case you're interested, that farewell was https://searchvoat.co/v/QRV/4174416 and I put forward-and-backwards URL links in all my posts, so if you got to one, you can get to them all. (Of course, I just tested this and it's not simple: clicking on it gives an error since it goes to Voat; then I added "search" before "voat.co" and it worked.)
God bless.
Thanks for this, I will have a fun time reading all this, as I wait for Jan 6th celebrations!!
Yeah I'm torn now, after having read this awesome comment last night which will go into today's report: https://greatawakening.win/p/11RNy7lRXI/x/c/4DrwC9joJFc
With this hernia and concussions I'm not the best "public personality" lol. But I am strongly considering the local state house. Keeping options open; it's helpful to be "retired" of sorts, fewer commitments so I get to make my own. Guess that's one reason I'm so verbose! :)
I have been hearing about Open Source intelligence from various people, perhaps thats a good place to be in!
thank you, now I can search for my video scrapbook. was sad to think all that great information was lost.
You're welcome! I have a feeling it'll come back.
[They] gave us a ton of info in the movies and TV shows. And, I stopped watching for the most part years ago, not quite a decade and I still occasionally will watch a movie (Tenet sucked, was just "special effects strung together"). So I don't get nearly as much "input" from their motives and motivations that are put into their productions, as I used to.
But I've seen enough to put interesting pictures together.
For instance, the last two Avengers movies' running times total exactly 330 minutes; a "33" reference, the highest degree of Masonry and also the number of bones in the spine (and more). Converting to hours, it's 5h30m, or 5.5 hours, a "5 by 5" reference. The timing tells me that the Q team is involved, similar to how the Twitter "DOITQ" image filename told me the Q team has code at Twitter.
In those movies, half the people die. For five years. Then they come back, but when they come back they haven't aged. Not sure people will be coming back, but the sites that we lost? All that data is there (even if just the copy at searchvoat.co) so the possibility that the site can come back is greater than zero.
I often get lost in what I'm saying as well. Tell me about the video scrapbook?
Thanks and God bless!
You are welcome. I know lots of stuff and have lots of gaps as well. Feel free to ask anything and if I know or can find the answer, well, it's ask and receive, right? :)