Must read tweet - lays out what is/will happen
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Anyone have a link to the source documents?
Seconded. Questions I have about the thread: He made reference to something being hidden in 1908. What was it?
He refers to a document known as The First Constitutional Congress. Why would a document be called a congress? Where did he find it?
In what way were 'buts kicked in 2014', and how did they attempt to charge government officials?
What is meant by the statement "...(sic) they fought charges that were not ruled under Code and Statues law, but were ruled under Rules and Ethics, and the Supreme Court ruled they were" ??????????
What is meant by the statement "August of 2016 by means of the Texas Rangers, it was found. For a short time it was all there in line at Cornell." What was found? What do the Rangers and Cornell (university?) have to do with anything?
I looked for answers in replies in the twitter thread, but nobody else seemed curious enough to ask.
@ProudOfAmerica, if you mean documentation on who enforces this US Code:
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
Here is the answer with cavits / stipulations embedded in it: "The Posse Comitatus Act":
"The Posse Comitatus Act outlaws the willful use of any part of the Army or Air Force to execute the law unless expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress. History supplies the grist for an argument that the Constitution prohibits military involvement in civilian affairs subject to only limited alterations by Congress or the President, but the courts do not appear to have ever accepted the argument unless violation of more explicit constitutional command could also be shown. The express statutory exceptions include the legislation that allows the President to use military force to suppress insurrection or to enforce federal authority, 10 U.S.C. Sections 251-255, and laws that permit the Department of Defense to provide federal, state and local police with information, equipment, and personnel, 10 U.S.C. §§ 271-284.
"The Posse Comitatus":
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42659.pdf
you know, we live in a context where the Supreme Court denied access to Texas - a state - saying a state does not have standing to seek redress of grievance in matters of the contract between the union compact of states, i.e., the Constitution
that was a flagrant violation of the the Constitution by the Supreme Court - an act of abject tyranny to deny a member of a contract access to redress of grievance when the Constitution holds that the Supreme Court is the only court in which such matters can be arbitrated for the parties to the contract (i.e., the states)
what any courts at any level of government now have to say on anything pertaining to what the Executive Branch decides to do to save the Republic from a communist China take-over of North America - they don't matter any more
when the courts themselves demonstrate such contempt for our system of rule of law, then the courts only deserve for contempt to be ladled onto them
the stolen election has only brought to the surface how corrupt the courts are at all levels - up to the highest court
and this
https://www.ncis.navy.mil/Portals/25/Documents/Reading%20Room/Operational%20Records/NCIS%203%20release.pdf?ver=2020-05-28-151815-053