https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/20
Also on 12-28-2020:
"(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.) MONDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2020 APPEALS -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS 20-561 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. SAN JOSE, CA, ET AL. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting). 20-662 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. USECHE, NATALIA, ET AL. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting). "
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/20 Also on 12-28-2020: "(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.) MONDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2020 APPEALS -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS 20-561 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. SAN JOSE, CA, ET AL. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting). 20-662 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. USECHE, NATALIA, ET AL. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (per curiam). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in Trump v. New York, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting). "